[logseq-plugin-git:commit] 2026-01-28T15:16:04.330Z
This commit is contained in:
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ progress:: {{renderer :todomaster}}
|
||||
- TODO [#B] [[PAPERS/Journal-Green-Paper]]
|
||||
- TODO [#C] Rivedere Composizione Collegio
|
||||
todoist-id:: [8750396305](https://app.todoist.com/app/task/8750396305)
|
||||
SCHEDULED: <2026-01-26 Mon>
|
||||
SCHEDULED: <2026-01-31 Sat>
|
||||
:LOGBOOK:
|
||||
CLOCK: [2025-06-04 Wed 21:44:39]--[2025-06-04 Wed 23:46:56] => 02:02:17
|
||||
:END:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
||||
icon:: ✏️
|
||||
generation_time:: [[2026-01-28]] T13:00:25Z
|
||||
generation_time:: [[2026-01-28]] T15:00:25Z
|
||||
|
||||
- # **TODOs and IDEAs**
|
||||
- {{query (and [[TODO]] [[KaraKeep-Highlights]] (or [[Ideas]] [[KaraKeep-Highlights]]))}}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ progress:: {{renderer :todomaster}}
|
||||
SCHEDULED: <2025-11-21 Fri>
|
||||
- TODO [#B] [[Benchmarking framework]]
|
||||
todoist-id:: [9524235429](https://app.todoist.com/app/task/9524235429)
|
||||
SCHEDULED: <2026-01-26 Mon 12:00>
|
||||
SCHEDULED: <2026-01-30 Fri 12:00>
|
||||
:LOGBOOK:
|
||||
CLOCK: [2025-12-16 Tue 16:19:32]--[2025-12-17 Wed 16:06:00] => 23:46:28
|
||||
:END:
|
||||
@@ -203,11 +203,11 @@ progress:: {{renderer :todomaster}}
|
||||
- TODO [[Deliverable D3.2]]
|
||||
todoist-desc:: [MOSAICO D3.2 - Online LaTeX Editor Overleaf](https://www.overleaf.com/project/693c083f94f20a5d73e1824c)
|
||||
todoist-id:: [9822333606](https://app.todoist.com/app/task/9822333606)
|
||||
SCHEDULED: <2026-01-27 Tue>
|
||||
SCHEDULED: <2026-01-28 Wed>
|
||||
- TODO [#A] [[TOOL DEMO TRACK - MODELS 2026 Organizing Committee]]
|
||||
todoist-desc:: From: lolaburgueno@uma.es
|
||||
todoist-id:: [9789940282](https://app.todoist.com/app/task/9789940282)
|
||||
SCHEDULED: <2026-01-26 Mon>
|
||||
SCHEDULED: <2026-01-31 Sat>
|
||||
- DONE [#B] [[PAPERS/J-2026-JSS-RAGGuard]]
|
||||
todoist-desc:: *Paper rifiutato a SANER 2026 (I commenti sono* [Document shared with you: ‘SANER2026-RAGGuard-Reviews’ - davide.diruscio@gmail.com - Gmail](https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#all/FMfcgzQdzmXLPrtWwckTPvVSQhrHDXGf))
|
||||
todoist-id:: [9892059786](https://app.todoist.com/app/task/9892059786)
|
||||
@@ -215,4 +215,4 @@ progress:: {{renderer :todomaster}}
|
||||
- TODO [#B] [[PAPERS/J-Collaborative-Development]]
|
||||
todoist-desc:: WebLink: [Outlook](https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?ItemID=AAMkADM1NGNiNjk0LTY0ZGUtNDgzOC04MDM5LWNhODNkYWNjNjU4YwBGAAAAAACT6qp78kRgRKuUMBdWEga%2FBwCOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAAAAAEMAACOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAiaRHodAAA%3D&exvsurl=1&viewmodel=ReadMessageItem)
|
||||
todoist-id:: [9919300374](https://app.todoist.com/app/task/9919300374)
|
||||
SCHEDULED: <2026-01-26 Mon>
|
||||
SCHEDULED: <2026-01-30 Fri>
|
||||
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
@@ -61,4 +61,15 @@
|
||||
todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT
|
||||
todoist-due:: 2026-01-29
|
||||
todoist-desc:: From: federico.grande@graduate.univaq.it Received: 2026-01-26T13:32:28Z ✉: [Web Link](https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?ItemID=AAMkADM1NGNiNjk0LTY0ZGUtNDgzOC04MDM5LWNhODNkYWNjNjU4YwBGAAAAAACT6qp78kRgRKuUMBdWEga%2FBwCOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAAAAAEMAACOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAihJn8IAAA%3D&exvsurl=1&viewmodel=ReadMessageItem) --- **Task Summary:** Federico is inquiring about the Quantum Computing course with Professor Guidoni. He wants to know if there have been any changes to the course schedule as the stated start date of January 13th has passed without updates and his attempt to join a Teams meeting was unsuccessful. Additionally, Federico has received approval for his tutoring activity from the faculty and requests a document to present to the call commission. **Recommended Actions:** * **Clarify Quantum Computing Course Schedule:** * Confirm the current start date and any changes to the schedule for Professor Guidoni's Quantum Computing course. * Investigate why the Teams meeting was empty. * Communicate the updated course information to Federico. * **Provide Document for Tutoring Activity:** * Generate and provide an official document confirming the approval of Federico's tutoring activity by the faculty. * Ensure the document is suitable for presentation to the call commission. **Deadline:** None specified in the email. --- Buon pomeriggio Professore, volevo chiederle un’informazione riguardo al corso di Quantum Computing del Prof. Guidoni. Dal documento sul sito risultava che le lezioni dovessero iniziare il 13 gennaio, ma non ho trovato aggiornamenti a riguardo. Ho anche
|
||||
todoist-status:: ◼️
|
||||
- [[2026-01-29]] [Buongiorno Prof. Dovrei aver concluso il progetto con lo sviluppo dei 4 punti che ci siamo detti sopra durante l'esame. Spiego di seguito: un container per ogni componente: Ogni componente logico (Monitor, Analyzer, Planner, Executor, Knowledge Base) è eseguito in un container Docker dedicato e isolato, garantendo modularità, ognuno con le sue dipendenze. estensibilità rispetto a sensori vs attuatori: ho superato la logica hardcoded come ci eravamo detti in riferimento alla slide 06_Slides-Control-Systems-v2.pdf implementando una gestione basata su Control Loops configurabili. Il sistema ora non conosce a priori le regole, ma istanzia dinamicamente i loop (es. Hydration Loop, Safety Loop) leggendoli dalla configurazione. Questo garantisce la totale estensibilità rispetto a nuovi sensori o nuove regole di adattamento senza ricompilare il codice. configurazione con un container dedicato: ho implementato un container dedicato (config-server) che agisce come Single Source of Truth, iniettando le policy di adattamento e la topologia a runtime. documentazione: È allegato il report PDF strutturato secondo il template fornito, completo di tassonomia dell'adattamento, logica formale e validazione visiva degli scenari tramite Dashboard Grafana.Ho inserito tutto nel repo https://github.com/ocraton/smart-olive-grove](https://teams.microsoft.com/l/message/19:afb6a496-7b16-4b74-8c53-1cd450e586f9_c2787b22-cc39-410e-a383-56cbdb9b69c9@unq.gbl.spaces/1769424079721?context=%7B%22contextType%22:%22chat%22%7D)
|
||||
todoist-id:: [6fr34W536H4grP9g](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fr34W536H4grP9g)
|
||||
todoist-project:: #👨🏫 Teaching
|
||||
todoist-due:: 2026-01-29
|
||||
todoist-status:: ◼️
|
||||
- [[2026-01-29]] Manuscript ID SOSYM-26-00005495 is now in your Editor Center
|
||||
todoist-id:: [6fqqJqV6XmqFHJVg](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fqqJqV6XmqFHJVg)
|
||||
todoist-project:: #💺 EditoringChairing
|
||||
todoist-due:: 2026-01-29
|
||||
todoist-desc:: From: onbehalfof@manuscriptcentral.com Received: 2026-01-25T14:55:25Z ✉: [Web Link](https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?ItemID=AAMkADM1NGNiNjk0LTY0ZGUtNDgzOC04MDM5LWNhODNkYWNjNjU4YwBGAAAAAACT6qp78kRgRKuUMBdWEga%2FBwCOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAAAAAEMAACOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAihJn7SAAA%3D&exvsurl=1&viewmodel=ReadMessageItem) --- ## Task Summary: Reviewer Assignment for Manuscript SOSYM-26-00005495 A manuscript titled "Integrating Pretrained Large Language Models and Graph Neural Networks For Model-Driven Engineering: A Graph Language Modeling Framework" (ID SOSYM-26-00005495) has been submitted to the journal Software and Systems Modeling. Professor Davide Di Ruscio is requested to assign reviewers for this manuscript. ## Actionable Task for Professor Davide Di Ruscio: **Task Title:** Assign Reviewers for Manuscript SOSYM-26-00005495 **Description:** Assign appropriate reviewers for the submitted manuscript SOSYM-26-00005495. **Key Actions:** 1. **Login:** Access the journal's editorial system at `https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/sosym` using your credentials (User ID: `davide.diruscio@univaq.it`). 2. **Navigate:** Go to your "Editor Center". 3. **Locate Manuscript:** Click on "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" and then click "Take Action" for manuscript SOSYM-26-00005495. 4. **Search & Select Reviewers:** Utilize the quick or advanced search fields to find suitable reviewers. Select reviewers using the checkboxes and click "Add". 5. **Create New Reviewers (Optional):** If necessary, create new reviewer accounts, ensuring no duplicates. 6. **Invite Reviewers:** Press the "Invite" button in the "Reviewer List". 7. **Edit & Send Invitation:** Edit the invitation message as desired and then press "Save and Send". 8. **Monitor Review Quality:** Be vigilant about the quality of reviews provided, considering the potential misuse of Generative AI. 9. **Consult Guidelines:** Refer to the Editor guidelines at `http://www.sosym.org/editor_guidelines/` for additional information. **Deadline:** As soon as possible. --- 25-Jan-2026 Dear Professor Davide Di Ruscio: Manuscript ID SOSYM-26-00005495 entitled "Integrating Pretrained Large Language Models and Graph Neural Networks For Model-Driven Engineering: A Graph Language Modeling Framework," with Professor Bork as
|
||||
todoist-status:: ◼️
|
||||
@@ -31,4 +31,23 @@
|
||||
todoist-project:: #🔭 Services-Commissione-Ricerca-DISIM
|
||||
todoist-due:: 2026-01-30
|
||||
todoist-desc:: From: proget@strutture.univaq.it Received: 2025-12-22T14:22:50Z ✉: [Web Link](https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?ItemID=AAMkADM1NGNiNjk0LTY0ZGUtNDgzOC04MDM5LWNhODNkYWNjNjU4YwBGAAAAAACT6qp78kRgRKuUMBdWEga%2FBwCOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAAAAAEMAACOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAiOPS6ZAAA%3D&exvsurl=1&viewmodel=ReadMessageItem) --- Okay, here's a synthesis of the email content, summarized and designed to be actionable, focusing on the key information and suggesting steps: **Task Summary:** The email is a formal announcement regarding the completion of a project proposal ("Avviso per la presentazione di Progetti..."). It's requesting confirmation of receipt and potentially a preliminary review. **Detailed Breakdown & Actionable Steps:** 1. **Confirmation of Receipt:** *Immediately* confirm you’ve received the email. If you haven’t, contact the sender (Luisa De Matteis) via email. 2. **Understand the Content:** The email highlights the crucial point that the project proposal ("Progetti di Ateneo") has been published and is awaiting review. The key elements are: * **Official Publication:** It was published at the Albo ufficiale di Ateneo. * **Ricerca - Finanziamenti di Ateneo:** It is related to funding and research initiatives within the Ateneo University. * **Due Diligence Required:** It's essential to review the proposal thoroughly. 3. **Recommended Actions - Initial Review & Contact:** * **Review the Proposal:** Carefully read the entire document. Understand the scope, goals, and deliverables. * **Contact the Sender (Luisa De Matteis):** Send a polite email requesting a brief overview of the proposal. Specifically state your intention to review it and any initial questions you have. Ask for a preliminary assessment of the document’s completeness and relevance to your team. 4. **Specific Questions to Ask (Based on the Email's Context - these are crucial):** * What is the stated purpose/goal of the project? * What specific areas require the most attention during the review? * Are there any attachments or supplementary materials that are needed? 5. **Legal Compliance & Disclaimers:** Before proceeding, review the email for the disclaimer concerning data privacy. Ensure your actions comply with all relevant legal requirements regarding the handling of sensitive project information. 6. **Documentation:** Keep a record of your communication with Luisa De Matteis and the email itself. --- **To help me refine this further and tailor it to a specific scenario, could you tell me:** * What is the role of the recipient? (e.g., Project Manager, Researcher, Legal Counsel?) * What is the project being reviewed? (A general idea is helpful.) --- Gentilissime e gentilissimi, vi inoltriamo il Decreto di rettifica dell'Avviso per la presentazione di Progetti di Ateneo per la Ricerca di Base e Avvio alla Ricerca per l'anno 2026. Il presente documento è stato pubblicato all'Albo ufficiale di Ateneo
|
||||
todoist-status:: ◼️
|
||||
- [[2026-01-30]] Fwd: Decision on your submission - JSSOFTWARE-D-25-01604
|
||||
todoist-id:: [6fpXr6XWhhcQWfrc](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fpXr6XWhhcQWfrc)
|
||||
todoist-project:: #📧EmailsToAnswer
|
||||
todoist-due:: 2026-01-30
|
||||
todoist-desc:: From: disorbo@unisannio.it Received: 2026-01-20T09:03:13Z ✉: [Web Link](https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?ItemID=AAMkADM1NGNiNjk0LTY0ZGUtNDgzOC04MDM5LWNhODNkYWNjNjU4YwBGAAAAAACT6qp78kRgRKuUMBdWEga%2FBwCOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAAAAAEMAACOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAidZtYrAAA%3D&exvsurl=1&viewmodel=ReadMessageItem) --- Here's a summary of the email content and the corresponding actionable task: **Task Summary:** The email is a rejection notification from the Journal of Systems and Software (JSS) for the submission "Examining Fairness Issues in Machine Learning-based Systems" (Ref. No.: JSSOFTWARE-D-25-01604). While the paper is rejected, the editor strongly advises resubmission after addressing the reviewers' detailed comments. The reviewers highlight significant areas for improvement in the manuscript's framing of fairness, integration of related work, methodological structure and detail (especially for the qualitative analysis), dataset selection justification, and the significance and implications of the results. The resubmitted paper will be treated as a new submission. **Actionable Task:** **Task:** Revise and Resubmit Paper to Journal of Systems and Software **Description:** The submission "Examining Fairness Issues in Machine Learning-based Systems" (Ref. No.: JSSOFTWARE-D-25-01604) has been rejected by the Journal of Systems and Software. However, the editor encourages resubmission after addressing detailed reviewer comments. Key areas for improvement include: * **Framing of Fairness:** Clearly define whether fairness is treated as a technical, socio-technical, or hybrid concern. * **Related Work:** Synthesize the literature into a coherent argument rather than an enumerative survey. * **Methodology:** * Present a unified methodological structure with clear workflows and transitions between phases. * Provide more detailed explanations for the qualitative coding process, including iteration, rater interaction, and reliance on LLM summaries. * Clarify the sequencing of methodological steps and ensure logical dependencies. * Justify dataset selection criteria and report exclusion numbers. * Ensure consistency between research questions and the role of LLMs. * Consider extending the dataset size if feasible through pre-screening. * **Results and Discussion:** * Explicitly discuss novel vs. incremental findings and align with previous empirical work. * Provide concrete examples of implications for practitioners. * Consider adding new research questions and discussions. * Clarify the rationale for using large language models. * **Overall Cohesion:** Improve the integration and cohesion across different methods employed in the study. **Recommended Actions:** 1. **Thoroughly read and understand all reviewer comments.** 2. **Develop a detailed plan to address each comment.** Categorize comments by theme (e.g., Introduction, Methodology, Results, Discussion) to facilitate systematic revision. 3. **Rewrite sections of the manuscript** based on the reviewer feedback, focusing on the identified weaknesses. 4. **Prepare a comprehensive response letter** detailing how each reviewer comment has been addressed. 5. **Ensure the resubmitted manuscript is treated as a NEW submission** but consider disclosing the original submission information and reference number. 6. **Consult empirical research guidelines** (e.g., Paul Ralph et al. 2020) for structuring the revised manuscript and methodology. 7. **Consider creating a methodological diagram** to clarify the workflow. **No Deadline:** The email does not specify a deadline for resubmission. --- Buongiorno a tutti, vi giro la mail ricevuta da JSS. Saluti, Andrea ---------- Forwarded message --------- Da: Journal of Systems and Software <em@editorialmanager.com> Date: lun 19 gen 2026 alle ore 10:59 Subject: Decision on your submission
|
||||
todoist-status:: ◼️
|
||||
- [[2026-01-30]] [[PAPERS/J-Collaborative-Development]]
|
||||
todoist-id:: [6fmMjW88FQ9m8x2g](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fmMjW88FQ9m8x2g)
|
||||
todoist-project:: #✏️ PAPERS
|
||||
todoist-due:: 2026-01-30
|
||||
todoist-desc:: WebLink: [Outlook](https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?ItemID=AAMkADM1NGNiNjk0LTY0ZGUtNDgzOC04MDM5LWNhODNkYWNjNjU4YwBGAAAAAACT6qp78kRgRKuUMBdWEga%2FBwCOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAAAAAEMAACOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAiaRHodAAA%3D&exvsurl=1&viewmodel=ReadMessageItem)
|
||||
todoist-labels:: #goal #logseqed
|
||||
todoist-status:: ◼️
|
||||
- [[2026-01-30]] Certificazione corsi di dottorato non presenti su ESSE3
|
||||
todoist-id:: [6frGFmx63Q8xJ478](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6frGFmx63Q8xJ478)
|
||||
todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT
|
||||
todoist-due:: 2026-01-30
|
||||
todoist-desc:: From: leonardo.fazzini1@graduate.univaq.it Received: 2026-01-27T15:58:11Z ✉: [Web Link](https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?ItemID=AAMkADM1NGNiNjk0LTY0ZGUtNDgzOC04MDM5LWNhODNkYWNjNjU4YwBGAAAAAACT6qp78kRgRKuUMBdWEga%2FBwCOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAAAAAEMAACOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAih8lmlAAA%3D&exvsurl=1&viewmodel=ReadMessageItem) --- Here's a summary of the email and an actionable task description: **Task Title:** Ensure PhD Course Registrations are Completed on ESSE3 **Task Description:** Leonardo Fazzini, a second-year ICT PhD student, is requesting assistance with the registration of two PhD courses on the ESSE3 platform. He completed both courses during his first year: * **Research Methodology** (internal, taught by Prof. Thanh Phuong Nguyen) * **Neural Networks and Deep Learning** (external, taught by Prof. Giorgio Buttazzo at Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna) Leonardo submitted all required documentation for both courses during the transition from his first to his second year, but neither course is currently registered on ESSE3. **Recommended Actions:** * Investigate the status of the course registrations on the ESSE3 platform. * Contact the relevant administrative office or individuals responsible for ESSE3 course registration to understand the delay. * Follow up with the professors or departments involved if further information or documentation is required. * Ensure both "Research Methodology" and "Neural Networks and Deep Learning" courses are officially registered for Leonardo Fazzini on ESSE3. * Confirm with Leonardo Fazzini once the registrations are successfully completed. --- Gentili Professori Di Ruscio e Di Mascio, sono Leonardo Fazzini, dottorando in ICT al secondo anno, con supervisor Giacomo Valente e Luigi Pomante (in cc). Vi scrivo per segnalarvi una questione relativa alla registrazione dei corsi di dottorato. Nel co
|
||||
todoist-status:: ◼️
|
||||
@@ -32,4 +32,22 @@
|
||||
todoist-due:: 2026-02-02
|
||||
todoist-desc:: Subject: [EASE 2026] Research Papers Track Paper Assignment Sender: ease2026@easychair.org Weblink: [Outlook](https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?ItemID=AAMkADM1NGNiNjk0LTY0ZGUtNDgzOC04MDM5LWNhODNkYWNjNjU4YwBGAAAAAACT6qp78kRgRKuUMBdWEga%2FBwCOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAAAAAEMAACOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAih8lmYAAA%3D&exvsurl=1&viewmodel=ReadMessageItem) Summary: You are assigned to review 226 research papers for EASE 2026, with an expected load of 5-6 papers each. Access the submissions via EasyChair for EASE 2026. Main Instructions: - Provide positive and constructive reviews focusing on novelty, significance, soundness, verifiability, transparency, and presentation. - Follow the IEEE Code of Conduct and optionally refer to the Empirical Standards Checklist. - Use the scoring system: strong accept, accept, weak accept, weak reject, reject. Lead Reviewer Responsibilities (if designated): - Initiate and drive the discussion to reach consensus. - Check reviews for issues and request changes. - Write a meta-review summarizing discussion and rationale without revealing reviewer identities. Deadlines (AoE): - Paper assignment: January 27th - Reviews due: February 26th - Online discussion and meta-review: February 27th – March 10th - Notification date: March 13th Assigned Papers: - (46) A framework for Evaluating Bias in LLM-Generated Code - (62) A Universal Textual Merge Strategy Based on Tokens for Version Control Systems - (108) STLGT: A Scalable Trace-Based Linear Graph Transformer for Tail Latency Prediction in Microservices - (118) Sustainability of Open Source Machine Learning Robustness Assessment Tools: A Repository Mining Study - (184) Exploring Creativity in Human–Human-LLM Collaborative Software Design Subtasks: 1. Log in to EasyChair and access assigned submissions. (Due: Jan 27) 2. Review each assigned paper with positivity and constructiveness. 3. Use the scoring system to rate papers. 4. If lead reviewer, drive discussions, check reviews, and write meta-reviews. (Discussion phase: Feb 27 - Mar 10) 5. Submit all reviews by February 26. 6. Participate in online discussions and submit meta-review if applicable between February 27 and March 10. 7. Await notification on March 13. Please ensure to keep all reviews respectful and support your evaluations thoroughly. Contact program chairs Silvia Abrahão and Xin Xia for any questions.
|
||||
todoist-labels:: #ai-generated-main-task
|
||||
todoist-status:: ◼️
|
||||
- [[2026-02-02]] Contattare studenti restituzione portatili
|
||||
todoist-id:: [6f82x4WFg69Jmr99](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6f82x4WFg69Jmr99)
|
||||
todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT
|
||||
todoist-due:: 2026-02-02
|
||||
todoist-status:: ◼️
|
||||
- [[2026-02-02]] Manuscript in your Reviewer Center - IEEE Software, SWSI-2026-01-0024
|
||||
todoist-id:: [6fjh74qpCPV5HJ38](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fjh74qpCPV5HJ38)
|
||||
todoist-project:: #📜 REVIEWS
|
||||
todoist-due:: 2026-02-02
|
||||
todoist-desc:: From: onbehalfof@manuscriptcentral.com Received: 2026-01-12T07:28:14Z ✉: [Web Link](https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?ItemID=AAMkADM1NGNiNjk0LTY0ZGUtNDgzOC04MDM5LWNhODNkYWNjNjU4YwBGAAAAAACT6qp78kRgRKuUMBdWEga%2FBwCOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAAAAAEMAACOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAiX6FN1AAA%3D&exvsurl=1&viewmodel=ReadMessageItem) --- Okay, here’s a synthesis of the email content, transforming it into actionable tasks for completing the task of reviewing the manuscript. I’ve focused on clarity and providing specific steps. **Task Summary:** Review the IEEE Software manuscript ("SWSI-2026-01-0024") for adherence to peer review guidelines, focusing on confidentiality and providing substantive feedback. **Actionable Tasks & Breakdown:** 1. **Review Policies Understanding (Priority: High):** * **Action:** Thoroughly read the reviewer policies document (link: [https://magazines.ieeeauthorcenter.ieee.org/submit-your-article-for-peer-review/about-the-peer-review-process]) to understand the specific requirements for content, format, and communication. Pay close attention to the emphasis on confidentiality regarding AI-generated feedback. * **Deliverable:** A concise summary of key policy points – particularly concerning what constitutes acceptable or unacceptable review comments. 2. **Manuscript Review & Initial Assessment (Priority: High):** * **Action:** Begin reviewing the manuscript – specifically focusing on the sections related to the agentic system engineering context. Identify key sections: * **Abstract:** Ensure it accurately summarizes the manuscript's purpose and scope. * **Introduction:** Evaluate the relevance of the context engineering concept to the manuscript’s topic. * **Methodology:** Assess the methods used – are they appropriate for the context? * **Results & Discussion:** Confirm the results are logically supported by the methods. * **Conclusion:** Assess the final conclusion – is it justified and well-supported? * **Deliverable:** A brief (1-2 paragraph) summary of initial impressions, highlighting potential areas of concern (e.g., a lack of specific details, unclear methodology). 3. **Identify Key Concerns - Confidentiality & AI Feedback (Priority: Medium):** * **Action:** Specifically look for the sections where the reviewer emphasizes caution regarding sharing information about the manuscript with AI platforms for text generation. * **Deliverable:** A list of 2-3 *specific* concerns regarding the manuscript's use of AI-generated content, which you will need to address in your review. 4. **Content Review & Feedback (Priority: High):** * **Action:** Address the following points based on your concerns: * **Referencing:** Ensure all citations are accurate and properly formatted. * **Specificity:** Ensure claims are supported by evidence. * **Context:** Clarify the agentic system engineering context. Does it adequately demonstrate its significance? * **AI Integration:** Carefully assess the role and influence of AI. Does it feel like a supplementary tool or integral to the core work? (The reviewer’s concern about shared information is key here.) * **Deliverable:** Draft review comments addressing each identified concern, focusing on providing specific, constructive feedback. (Focus on the *why* behind your comments – not just stating the problem.) 5. **Review Score Sheet & Submission (Priority: Medium):** * **Action:** Carefully and accurately fill out the review score sheet, ensuring all sections are completed (Confidential Comments, Public Comments, and any other required fields). * **Deliverable:** Completed review score sheet, with all required fields filled. 6. **Communication Protocol (Priority: Medium):** * **Action:** Respond promptly to any questions from the editor or reviewer. Be professional and courteous. * **Deliverable:** A record of your communication attempts – noting the date, content, and outcome of each communication. 7. **Final Review & Submission (Priority: Low):** Once you've completed all steps, submit the manuscript for review. **Important Note:** Document *everything* – your reasoning behind the feedback, specific examples, and any changes made during the review process. This will provide a clear audit trail for future review decisions. --- Let me know if you'd like me to elaborate on any of these tasks or provide more specific examples! --- IEEE Software, SWSI-2026-01-0024 manuscript type: SWSI: Agentic System Engineering (Sep/Oct 2026) "Context Engineering for Software Engineering Agents" 12-Jan-2026 Dear Prof. Di Ruscio: Thank you for agreeing to review the above reference manus
|
||||
todoist-status:: ◼️
|
||||
- [[2026-02-02]] Richiesta variazione strutture estere mobilità e richiesta autorizzazioni - Giacomelli Stefano
|
||||
todoist-id:: [6fm4v9FRJ485fgv8](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fm4v9FRJ485fgv8)
|
||||
todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT
|
||||
todoist-due:: 2026-02-02
|
||||
todoist-desc:: From: [stefano.giacomelli@graduate.univaq.it](mailto:stefano.giacomelli@graduate.univaq.it) Received: 2026-01-13T21:06:18Z ✉: [Web Link](https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?ItemID=AAMkADM1NGNiNjk0LTY0ZGUtNDgzOC04MDM5LWNhODNkYWNjNjU4YwBGAAAAAACT6qp78kRgRKuUMBdWEga%2FBwCOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAAAAAEMAACOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAiX6FQMAAA%3D&exvsurl=1&viewmodel=ReadMessageItem) ✉: [Web Link](https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?ItemID=AAMkADM1NGNiNjk0LTY0ZGUtNDgzOC04MDM5LWNhODNkYWNjNjU4YwBGAAAAAACT6qp78kRgRKuUMBdWEga%2FBwCOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAAAAAEMAACOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAiVbuRCAAA%3D&exvsurl=1&viewmodel=ReadMessageItem) (Initial email) --- **Task Description:** Stefano Giacomelli, a PhD student in ICT, is requesting a change in his mandatory 6-month PNRR mobility program's host institution. He has secured a new host institution in Belgium (KU Leuven) and has obtained an official invitation letter. He is also providing supporting documents, including a letter detailing the reasons for the change, information on the new host institution, and his visiting proposal. Additionally, he is attaching authorization requests for the PhD program coordinator and will soon provide "commitment letters" from the new host institution. **Recommended Actions:** 1. **Review and Process Host Institution Change Request:** Evaluate the provided documentation for the change of host institution for Stefano Giacomelli's PNRR mobility. 2. **Verify Supporting Documents:** Ensure all attached documents (letter of motivation, host institution details, visiting proposal, invitation letters) are complete and accurate. 3. **Obtain Commitment Letters:** Follow up with Stefano Giacomelli to ensure timely submission of the "commitment letters" from the new host institution. 4. **Approve Coordination Request:** Review and approve the authorization requests for the PhD program coordinator. 5. **Facilitate Ministry Notification:** Transmit the approved request, including all necessary details of the new host institution, to the Ministry (MUR) via the CINECA platform as per the instructions. 6. **Confirm U-Web Mission Request:** Advise Stefano Giacomelli on the process for opening a mission request on the U-Web portal for his visiting period. 7. **Provide Additional Guidance:** Address any further questions Stefano Giacomelli may have regarding the administrative and bureaucratic procedures for his mobility. **Deadline:** - The email mentions that any variation to the initial project must be authorized by the Ministry and that this step is "very important and requires urgent action." While no specific date is given, this implies a need for prompt processing. --- Buonasera, Sono Stefano Giacomelli, dottorando DISIM ICT del XXXIX ciclo. A seguito delle informazioni ricevute mediante "Ticket - Help Point" dalla Dr.ssa Valeria Gentile, e in accordo con il mio Tutor (Prof. Fabio Graziosi) e il mio Supervisor (Prof.
|
||||
todoist-labels:: #followup
|
||||
todoist-status:: ◼️
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user