ddiruscio/logseq
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[logseq-plugin-git:commit] 2026-02-02T13:05:40.208Z

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
ddiruscio
2026-02-02 14:05:41 +01:00
parent 6e7e720401
commit 376f7be2a0
13 changed files with 317 additions and 268 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
pages/todoist___2026-02-03.md
+40
View File
@@ -55,4 +55,44 @@
todoist-project:: #✈ Missioni
todoist-due:: 2026-02-03
todoist-desc:: From: zhanna.zhussupova@imt-atlantique.fr Received: 2025-10-16T14:25:53Z ✉: [Web Link](https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?ItemID=AAMkADM1NGNiNjk0LTY0ZGUtNDgzOC04MDM5LWNhODNkYWNjNjU4YwBGAAAAAACT6qp78kRgRKuUMBdWEga%2FBwCOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAAAAAEMAACOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAhdt23FAAA%3D&exvsurl=1&viewmodel=ReadMessageItem) --- Dear all, We are pleased to confirm that the MOSAICO CM3 will be kindly hosted by Netcompany-Intrasoft at its Athens headquarters, located at 13 Fragkokklisias Street, Maroussi, Greece. Please find attached the directions to the venue and the list of
todoist-status:: ◼️
- [[2026-02-03]] Rivedere Composizione Collegio
todoist-id:: [6X4Jp7W4VW84FHqh](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6X4Jp7W4VW84FHqh)
todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT
todoist-due:: 2026-02-03
todoist-labels:: #goal
todoist-status:: ◼️
- [[2026-02-03]] Patrocini Pinkamp
todoist-id:: [6fv6xXxRwMPGXxHP](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fv6xXxRwMPGXxHP)
todoist-project:: #🌸 Services-PINKAMP
todoist-due:: 2026-02-03
todoist-status:: ◼️
- [[2026-02-03]] Nominare nuovo rappresentante studenti
todoist-id:: [6fWVrV7q926WxpGh](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fWVrV7q926WxpGh)
todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT
todoist-due:: 2026-02-03
todoist-status:: ◼️
- [[2026-02-03]] Pensare alla questione gestione Reference Group 2.2
todoist-id:: [6fhqXvj7Mj8hXmM9](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fhqXvj7Mj8hXmM9)
todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT
todoist-due:: 2026-02-03
todoist-status:: ◼️
- [[2026-02-03]] [Dottorato PNRR] Relazione annuale di sintesi
todoist-id:: [6fj3mhqW972xv5c8](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fj3mhqW972xv5c8)
todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT
todoist-due:: 2026-02-03
todoist-desc:: From: alessandra.galassi@graduate.univaq.it Received: 2026-01-09T11:04:30Z ✉: [Web Link](https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?ItemID=AAMkADM1NGNiNjk0LTY0ZGUtNDgzOC04MDM5LWNhODNkYWNjNjU4YwBGAAAAAACT6qp78kRgRKuUMBdWEga%2FBwCOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAAAAAEMAACOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAiWL7x2AAA%3D&exvsurl=1&viewmodel=ReadMessageItem) --- Okay, here’s a synthesized summary of the email, broken down into actionable tasks, based on the content: **Task Summary:** The email is a formal message from a "Chiar.mo Coordinatore del corso dottorale in ICT prof. Di Ruscio" (Coordination Officer for the PhD in ICT Professor Di Ruscio) to the recipient. The recipient is being sent a completed and signed form outlining a course. **Actionable Tasks:** 1. **Review and Confirm Completeness:** Carefully read the completed and signed form to ensure all required information is accurately present. 2. **Attach the Form:** Attach the completed form to this email. 3. **Send the Form:** Send the attached form to the recipient. 4. **Express Good Wishes:** Compose a polite and cordial message to the recipient, wishing them a happy New Year. 5. **Verify Sender Information:** Ensure the email is sent from a valid and trusted source. Let me know if you'd like me to elaborate on any of these points or add more detail! --- Chiar.mo Coordinatore del corso dottorale in ICT prof. Di Ruscio, come da guida utente, in allegato, invio compilata e firmata quanto specificato in oggetto. Grazie. L’occasione è gradita per porgere i migliori auguri di buon anno! Un saluto cordiale,
todoist-status:: ◼️
- [[2026-02-03]] Richiesta variazione strutture estere mobilità e richiesta autorizzazioni - Giacomelli Stefano
todoist-id:: [6fm4v9FRJ485fgv8](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fm4v9FRJ485fgv8)
todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT
todoist-due:: 2026-02-03
todoist-desc:: From: [stefano.giacomelli@graduate.univaq.it](mailto:stefano.giacomelli@graduate.univaq.it) Received: 2026-01-13T21:06:18Z ✉: [Web Link](https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?ItemID=AAMkADM1NGNiNjk0LTY0ZGUtNDgzOC04MDM5LWNhODNkYWNjNjU4YwBGAAAAAACT6qp78kRgRKuUMBdWEga%2FBwCOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAAAAAEMAACOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAiX6FQMAAA%3D&exvsurl=1&viewmodel=ReadMessageItem) ✉: [Web Link](https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?ItemID=AAMkADM1NGNiNjk0LTY0ZGUtNDgzOC04MDM5LWNhODNkYWNjNjU4YwBGAAAAAACT6qp78kRgRKuUMBdWEga%2FBwCOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAAAAAEMAACOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAiVbuRCAAA%3D&exvsurl=1&viewmodel=ReadMessageItem) (Initial email) --- **Task Description:** Stefano Giacomelli, a PhD student in ICT, is requesting a change in his mandatory 6-month PNRR mobility program's host institution. He has secured a new host institution in Belgium (KU Leuven) and has obtained an official invitation letter. He is also providing supporting documents, including a letter detailing the reasons for the change, information on the new host institution, and his visiting proposal. Additionally, he is attaching authorization requests for the PhD program coordinator and will soon provide "commitment letters" from the new host institution. **Recommended Actions:** 1. **Review and Process Host Institution Change Request:** Evaluate the provided documentation for the change of host institution for Stefano Giacomelli's PNRR mobility. 2. **Verify Supporting Documents:** Ensure all attached documents (letter of motivation, host institution details, visiting proposal, invitation letters) are complete and accurate. 3. **Obtain Commitment Letters:** Follow up with Stefano Giacomelli to ensure timely submission of the "commitment letters" from the new host institution. 4. **Approve Coordination Request:** Review and approve the authorization requests for the PhD program coordinator. 5. **Facilitate Ministry Notification:** Transmit the approved request, including all necessary details of the new host institution, to the Ministry (MUR) via the CINECA platform as per the instructions. 6. **Confirm U-Web Mission Request:** Advise Stefano Giacomelli on the process for opening a mission request on the U-Web portal for his visiting period. 7. **Provide Additional Guidance:** Address any further questions Stefano Giacomelli may have regarding the administrative and bureaucratic procedures for his mobility. **Deadline:** - The email mentions that any variation to the initial project must be authorized by the Ministry and that this step is "very important and requires urgent action." While no specific date is given, this implies a need for prompt processing. --- Buonasera, Sono Stefano Giacomelli, dottorando DISIM ICT del XXXIX ciclo. A seguito delle informazioni ricevute mediante "Ticket - Help Point" dalla Dr.ssa Valeria Gentile, e in accordo con il mio Tutor (Prof. Fabio Graziosi) e il mio Supervisor (Prof.
todoist-labels:: #followup
todoist-status:: ◼️
- [[2026-02-03]] Manuscript in your Reviewer Center - IEEE Software, SWSI-2026-01-0024
todoist-id:: [6fjh74qpCPV5HJ38](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fjh74qpCPV5HJ38)
todoist-project:: #📜 REVIEWS
todoist-due:: 2026-02-03
todoist-desc:: From: onbehalfof@manuscriptcentral.com Received: 2026-01-12T07:28:14Z ✉: [Web Link](https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?ItemID=AAMkADM1NGNiNjk0LTY0ZGUtNDgzOC04MDM5LWNhODNkYWNjNjU4YwBGAAAAAACT6qp78kRgRKuUMBdWEga%2FBwCOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAAAAAEMAACOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAiX6FN1AAA%3D&exvsurl=1&viewmodel=ReadMessageItem) --- Okay, here’s a synthesis of the email content, transforming it into actionable tasks for completing the task of reviewing the manuscript. I’ve focused on clarity and providing specific steps. **Task Summary:** Review the IEEE Software manuscript ("SWSI-2026-01-0024") for adherence to peer review guidelines, focusing on confidentiality and providing substantive feedback. **Actionable Tasks & Breakdown:** 1. **Review Policies Understanding (Priority: High):** * **Action:** Thoroughly read the reviewer policies document (link: [https://magazines.ieeeauthorcenter.ieee.org/submit-your-article-for-peer-review/about-the-peer-review-process]) to understand the specific requirements for content, format, and communication. Pay close attention to the emphasis on confidentiality regarding AI-generated feedback. * **Deliverable:** A concise summary of key policy points – particularly concerning what constitutes acceptable or unacceptable review comments. 2. **Manuscript Review & Initial Assessment (Priority: High):** * **Action:** Begin reviewing the manuscript – specifically focusing on the sections related to the agentic system engineering context. Identify key sections: * **Abstract:** Ensure it accurately summarizes the manuscript's purpose and scope. * **Introduction:** Evaluate the relevance of the context engineering concept to the manuscript’s topic. * **Methodology:** Assess the methods used – are they appropriate for the context? * **Results & Discussion:** Confirm the results are logically supported by the methods. * **Conclusion:** Assess the final conclusion – is it justified and well-supported? * **Deliverable:** A brief (1-2 paragraph) summary of initial impressions, highlighting potential areas of concern (e.g., a lack of specific details, unclear methodology). 3. **Identify Key Concerns - Confidentiality & AI Feedback (Priority: Medium):** * **Action:** Specifically look for the sections where the reviewer emphasizes caution regarding sharing information about the manuscript with AI platforms for text generation. * **Deliverable:** A list of 2-3 *specific* concerns regarding the manuscript's use of AI-generated content, which you will need to address in your review. 4. **Content Review & Feedback (Priority: High):** * **Action:** Address the following points based on your concerns: * **Referencing:** Ensure all citations are accurate and properly formatted. * **Specificity:** Ensure claims are supported by evidence. * **Context:** Clarify the agentic system engineering context. Does it adequately demonstrate its significance? * **AI Integration:** Carefully assess the role and influence of AI. Does it feel like a supplementary tool or integral to the core work? (The reviewer’s concern about shared information is key here.) * **Deliverable:** Draft review comments addressing each identified concern, focusing on providing specific, constructive feedback. (Focus on the *why* behind your comments – not just stating the problem.) 5. **Review Score Sheet & Submission (Priority: Medium):** * **Action:** Carefully and accurately fill out the review score sheet, ensuring all sections are completed (Confidential Comments, Public Comments, and any other required fields). * **Deliverable:** Completed review score sheet, with all required fields filled. 6. **Communication Protocol (Priority: Medium):** * **Action:** Respond promptly to any questions from the editor or reviewer. Be professional and courteous. * **Deliverable:** A record of your communication attempts – noting the date, content, and outcome of each communication. 7. **Final Review & Submission (Priority: Low):** Once you've completed all steps, submit the manuscript for review. **Important Note:** Document *everything* – your reasoning behind the feedback, specific examples, and any changes made during the review process. This will provide a clear audit trail for future review decisions. --- Let me know if you'd like me to elaborate on any of these tasks or provide more specific examples! --- IEEE Software, SWSI-2026-01-0024 manuscript type: SWSI: Agentic System Engineering (Sep/Oct 2026) "Context Engineering for Software Engineering Agents" 12-Jan-2026 Dear Prof. Di Ruscio: Thank you for agreeing to review the above reference manus
todoist-status:: ◼️