[logseq-plugin-git:commit] 2026-01-21T09:58:08.361Z

2026-01-21 10:58:09 +01:00
parent 9ff2e5d47d
commit c2805a9dfb
7 changed files with 83 additions and 35 deletions
@@ -1356,7 +1356,7 @@
  todoist-id:: [6f8w5h2F9V5hgqP9](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6f8w5h2F9V5hgqP9)
  todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT
  todoist-status:: ◼️
- [[No due date]] Invitation to MODELS 2026 Program Board (please respond by Jan 12, 2026)
+- [[No due date]] MODELS 2026 Program Board
  todoist-id:: [6fX7jpjFhf3H7jM8](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fX7jpjFhf3H7jM8)
  todoist-project:: #💺 EditoringChairing
  todoist-desc:: From: noreply@easychair.org Received: 2025-12-19T15:23:11Z ✉: [Web Link](https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?ItemID=AAMkADM1NGNiNjk0LTY0ZGUtNDgzOC04MDM5LWNhODNkYWNjNjU4YwBGAAAAAACT6qp78kRgRKuUMBdWEga%2FBwCOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAAAAAEMAACOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAiITaDaAAA%3D&exvsurl=1&viewmodel=ReadMessageItem) --- Okay, here's a summary of the email content, formatted as a task list with actionable steps, designed to help Davide complete the program committee invitation: **Task: Respond to Models 2026 Program Committee Invitation** **Objective:** Accept or decline the invitation, and confirm participation in the program committee process. **Actionable Steps:** 1. **Review the Invitation Details:** Carefully re-read the email, paying close attention to the details about the program, the two-tier PB/PC structure, and the review timeline. 2. **Confirm Acceptance/Decline:** Decide whether to accept the invitation. If declining, clearly state the reason (optional, but helpful). 3. **Understand Responsibilities:** Read the detailed guidelines for the Program Board (PB) and Program Committee (PC) roles – specifically: * **Discussion Phase:** “Shepherd the discussion of roughly 8-12 papers in the ‘discussion’ phase” - This implies actively participating in discussions about papers. * **Reviewer Feedback:** “Actively participate in the online discussion with the PC members” - This means contribute to the review process. * **Review Summary & Question Formulation:** "Formulate, in collaboration with the PC members, a summary of the most salient reviewer remarks and formulate questions that authors may respond to during the rebuttal phase." - This is a critical task – draft a summary of reviewer comments and prepare a list of potential questions. * **Review Appraisal:** “Write a brief appraisal of the submission, discussing its pros and cons, in preparation for the PB meeting.” - Draft a concise evaluation of each paper. * **PB Meeting Participation:** "Participate in the PB meeting” - Confirm availability for the virtual meeting. * **Final Review & Metareview:** “Compose a final metareview, to be sent to authors, detailing the reasons that led to the accept/reject decision.” - Draft the email. 4. **Agree to Responsibilities:** Confirm your agreement to the responsibilities outlined in the email, referencing the specific guidelines. 5. **Consider PC Alternative:** If you prefer to serve on the PC instead of the PB, clearly state your preference. 6. **Send Response to Esther Guerra & Mehrdad Sabetzadeh:** Send a polite email to Esther and Mehrdad, reiterating your acceptance/rejection and providing your agreement to the responsibilities. **Key Deliverables:** * **Formal Acceptance/Rejection Email:** Draft a response acknowledging receipt of the invitation and state your decision. * **Summary of Review Guidelines:** A brief document outlining the key aspects of the review process. **Notes:** * Ensure the email template used reflects the tone and formality of the original email. * Double-check all dates and times to ensure accuracy. --- This letter of invitation to the program committee of MODELS 2026 was sent to you by EasyChair user Mehrdad Sabetzadeh <m.sabetzadeh@uottawa.ca>. To accept or decline this invitation and/or answer the letter please access https://easychair.org/conferenc