diff --git a/journals/2025_06_06.md b/journals/2025_06_06.md
index 3b71e2ab..7c4691e0 100644
--- a/journals/2025_06_06.md
+++ b/journals/2025_06_06.md
@@ -3,7 +3,8 @@ icon:: 📅
 boox-notes:: ![BOOX Notes](../assets/../../onyx/TabUltraCPro/Notepad/JOURNALING.pdf)
 
 	- ## Tasks
-		- TODO Finalizzare ICSE
+		- DONE Finalizzare ICSE
+id:: 68429a60-0890-4c30-894d-75d34710c00d
 			- [[EditoringChairing/2026-ICSE]]
 		- TODO Reviews RecSyS
 		- TODO Call Mosaico
diff --git a/pages/DONE.md b/pages/DONE.md
index 05a23895..251cc608 100644
--- a/pages/DONE.md
+++ b/pages/DONE.md
@@ -99,4 +99,6 @@ icon:: ✅
 		- ✔️ [[05-06-2025]]  *23:27* ((683620b6-076a-40c2-a39e-ed6e6b6b38d0))
 		- ✔️ [[05-06-2025]]  *23:27* ((683620b6-807d-4a7b-833c-08a95c81bc76))
 		- ✔️ [[05-06-2025]]  *23:30* ((683620b6-4510-470b-90ef-d8ec1122471c))
-		- ✔️ [[06-06-2025]]  *09:53* ((683e08c8-82e3-4e52-8c5d-16a3c15ba341))
\ No newline at end of file
+		- ✔️ [[06-06-2025]]  *09:53* ((683e08c8-82e3-4e52-8c5d-16a3c15ba341))
+		- ✔️ [[06-06-2025]]  *10:05* ((683e08c8-c3b2-4f6b-b62f-fc1cd4c1767b))
+		- ✔️ [[06-06-2025]]  *10:06* ((68429a60-0890-4c30-894d-75d34710c00d))
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/pages/EditoringChairing___2026-ICSE.md b/pages/EditoringChairing___2026-ICSE.md
index 2033ae37..7f34a4cc 100644
--- a/pages/EditoringChairing___2026-ICSE.md
+++ b/pages/EditoringChairing___2026-ICSE.md
@@ -5,7 +5,11 @@
 			- I'm reviewer B for this paper
 		- [[icse2026-paper50]]
 		- Triggered discussion
-	- [#1640 - ICSE 2026, Research Track](https://icse2026.hotcrp.com/paper/1640)
+	- DONE [#1640 - ICSE 2026, Research Track](https://icse2026.hotcrp.com/paper/1640)
+id:: 683e08c8-c3b2-4f6b-b62f-fc1cd4c1767b
+	  :LOGBOOK:
+	  CLOCK: [2025-06-06 Fri 10:05:33]--[2025-06-06 Fri 10:05:34] =>  00:00:01
+	  :END:
 		- [[icse2026-paper1640]]
 		- Triggered the discussion
 - [**ICSE 2026 Review Process and Guidelines - Google Slides**](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1YD3-H2fgA26SQhv7VqUMRB936GeYjvWZOgHltsIgeL4/edit?slide=id.ge27c856fa7_1_15#slide=id.ge27c856fa7_1_15)
diff --git a/pages/icse2026-paper1640.md b/pages/icse2026-paper1640.md
index 404457da..23bf506e 100644
--- a/pages/icse2026-paper1640.md
+++ b/pages/icse2026-paper1640.md
@@ -152,6 +152,7 @@ todoist:: https://app.todoist.com/app/task/1640-evolutionary-prompt-engineering-
 		  
 		  **How can you be sure about that? **#**question**
 	- ### [[Comments]]
+	  collapsed:: true
 		- #.tabular
 			- ### Paper summary
 				- The paper presents the EPiC framework to support code generation by means of LLM. In particular, the approach aims to automatically generate prompts by means of evolutionary strategies. Initial prompts are automatically mutated to lead to refined prompts that optimize code generation accuracy and cost-effectiveness. The approach has been evaluated on three datasets and has been shown to outperform existing baselines.
@@ -204,6 +205,8 @@ todoist:: https://app.todoist.com/app/task/1640-evolutionary-prompt-engineering-
 				- 1. How is the correctness of the generated test cases ensured, especially when they are produced automatically by LLMs?
 				- 2. What are the mutation operators and selection strategies used to evolve prompts, and how are they guided?
 				- 3. How is the concept of cost-effectiveness defined, measured, and validated in the EPiC framework?
+	- [[Metareview]]
+		- This paper introduces EPiC, a framework for improving LLM-based code generation via evolutionary prompt refinement. While the topic is interesting, all reviewers raised serious concerns about the experimental assumptions, particularly the reliance on automatically generated test cases whose semantic correctness is not validated. The authors' rebuttal acknowledges limitations but fails to sufficiently address how these assumptions impact result validity. Additional concerns include unclear novelty over prior work, weak justification of core design choices, and insufficient evaluation of prompt mutation strategies. Given these limitations, the paper is not ready for acceptance in its current form. However, the reviewers have provided suggestions that we think will be valuable in improving the paper for potential publication in the future.
 	- ### [[REVIEWS/Notes]]
 	- ### YELLOW CONCERNS
 	  background-color:: yellow