From ccbc6a7ea3a57865b3e663e4358745c46170db1c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Davide Di Ruscio Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 11:29:45 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] [logseq-plugin-git:commit] 2026-01-26T10:29:45.108Z --- pages/KaraKeep-Highlights.md | 2 +- pages/todoist___2026-01-26.md | 27 ++------------------------- pages/todoist___2026-01-27.md | 7 +++++++ pages/todoist___2026-01-28.md | 5 +++++ pages/todoist___2026-01-31.md | 5 +++++ pages/todoist___2026-02-02.md | 5 +++++ 6 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) diff --git a/pages/KaraKeep-Highlights.md b/pages/KaraKeep-Highlights.md index 88a7191f..7682d02a 100644 --- a/pages/KaraKeep-Highlights.md +++ b/pages/KaraKeep-Highlights.md @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ icon:: ✏️ -generation_time:: [[2026-01-26]] T06:00:25Z +generation_time:: [[2026-01-26]] T10:00:25Z - # **TODOs and IDEAs** - {{query (and [[TODO]] [[KaraKeep-Highlights]] (or [[Ideas]] [[KaraKeep-Highlights]]))}} diff --git a/pages/todoist___2026-01-26.md b/pages/todoist___2026-01-26.md index 990376c4..d9961612 100644 --- a/pages/todoist___2026-01-26.md +++ b/pages/todoist___2026-01-26.md @@ -90,23 +90,6 @@ todoist-due:: 2026-01-26 todoist-desc:: From: m.s.trab@hotmail.com Received: 2026-01-08T09:03:19Z ✉: [Web Link](https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?ItemID=AAMkADM1NGNiNjk0LTY0ZGUtNDgzOC04MDM5LWNhODNkYWNjNjU4YwBGAAAAAACT6qp78kRgRKuUMBdWEga%2FBwCOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAAAAAEMAACOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAiVbuRAAAA%3D&exvsurl=1&viewmodel=ReadMessageItem) --- Okay, here's a synthesized summary of the email content, broken down into actionable tasks and a brief explanation of the key points: **Summary of Email Content:** The email is requesting Professor Di Ruscio's availability as the responsible professor for coordinating a Erasmus+ credit mobility visit to the University of L’Aquila (Department of Information Engineering, Computer Science and Mathematics). The primary task is to review and collaborate on the proposed mobility programme, ensuring alignment with department priorities and ongoing initiatives. The email also provides attached documents: a CV and a proposed mobility programme. Finally, it includes contact information and a thank you for their guidance. **Actionable Tasks & Recommendations:** 1. **Review the Proposed Mobility Programme:** Carefully examine the proposed mobility programme – the attachments provided. Ensure it aligns with the department’s specific goals, research areas, and current projects. 2. **Review CV:** Thoroughly analyze the CV to understand the applicant's qualifications and experience, particularly relevant to the Erasmus+ visit. 3. **Collaborate on Academic & Training Activities:** Work with the applicant to define the specific learning and research activities that should be undertaken during the visit. Establish clear objectives and expected outcomes. 4. **Agreement on Programmatic Details:** Discuss and finalize the details of the program. This includes: * **Timeline:** Set a realistic timeline for the project's completion. * **Budget:** Establish a budget for resources and travel. * **Responsibilities:** Clearly delineate the roles and responsibilities of both the applicant and the professor. 5. **Provide Feedback:** Offer constructive feedback on the proposed mobility programme. This includes suggestions for improvements to enhance the student’s experience and contribution to the department's goals. 6. **Confirmation & Next Steps:** Formalize the agreement and schedule a follow-up meeting or communication to discuss the collaboration further. 7. **Contact Information:** Double-check the contact details provided. Let me know if you'd like me to elaborate on any of these tasks or provide more specific suggestions! --- Dear Prof. Di Ruscio, I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to kindly request your availability to act as the responsible professor for coordinating my upcoming Erasmus+ credit mobility visit to the University of L’Aquila, specifically within todoist-status:: ◼️ -- [[2026-01-26]] [📢 NEWS FLASH - NEW FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES: Including Horizon Europe 2026-2027 Work Programmes (worth €14 billion) Published 1) HORIZON EUROPE 2026-27 WORK PROGRAMMES, CALLS & EU INFODAYS 👉 All… …](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/jo-frost-15936423_news-flash-new-funding-opportunities-activity-7404829038617337856-Jrt8?utm_source=social_share_send&utm_medium=android_app&rcm=ACoAAACaoXoBMvdj060syLix4vC3rwOgjAE9MpU&utm_campaign=share_via) - todoist-id:: [6fVGR9pwQP92rGj8](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fVGR9pwQP92rGj8) - todoist-project:: #🚀 Projects - todoist-due:: 2026-01-26 - todoist-status:: ◼️ -- [[2026-01-26]] GSSI Committee Documents – Draft Minutes and Regulation - todoist-id:: [6fVFH9Gfqgfh6cj8](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fVFH9Gfqgfh6cj8) - todoist-project:: #👷 WORK - todoist-due:: 2026-01-26 - todoist-desc:: [Web Link](https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?ItemID=AAkALgAAAAAAHYQDEapmEc2byACqAC%2FEWg0AjoVpQvBez0Ss5ZY2WGWEJgAIgIklWAAA&exvsurl=1&viewmodel=ReadMessageItem) Task Title: Review and Organize GSSI Committee Documents Task Description: Review and organize the draft minutes and regulations of the GSSI Committee to ensure accuracy, completeness, and ease of access. The task involves the following actions: 1. Download and open the email attachment containing the draft minutes and regulations. 2. Review the documents to verify their accuracy and completeness. Identify any discrepancies or inconsistencies and make necessary corrections. 3. Organize the documents in a logical and accessible manner, such as creating folders or tags for each document type (e.g., minutes, regulations, etc.). 4. Save the organized documents in a central location, such as a shared drive or cloud storage, to ensure easy accessibility for all committee members. 5. Notify the committee members of the availability of the organized documents and provide instructions on how to access them. 6. Maintain the documents and ensure they are up-to-date and current. Actionable Steps: 1. Download and open the email attachment containing the draft minutes and regulations. 2. Review the documents for accuracy and completeness. 3. Organize the documents in a logical and accessible manner. 4. Save the organized documents in a central location. 5. Notify committee members of the availability of the organized documents. 6. Maintain the documents and ensure they are up-to-date and current. - todoist-labels:: #outlook365 - todoist-status:: ◼️ -- [[2026-01-26]] Pensare alla questione gestione Reference Group 2.2 - todoist-id:: [6fhqXvj7Mj8hXmM9](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fhqXvj7Mj8hXmM9) - todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT - todoist-due:: 2026-01-26 - todoist-status:: ◼️ - [[2026-01-26]] [IRIS]: Registrazione tesi todoist-id:: [6fqHHjcMQ8hF5VM8](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fqHHjcMQ8hF5VM8) todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT @@ -236,12 +219,6 @@ todoist-desc:: Weblink: [Outlook](https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?ItemID=AAMkADM1NGNiNjk0LTY0ZGUtNDgzOC04MDM5LWNhODNkYWNjNjU4YwBGAAAAAACT6qp78kRgRKuUMBdWEga%2FBwCOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAAAAAEMAACOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAiamtsPAAA%3D&exvsurl=1&viewmodel=ReadMessageItem) Email Content Summary: Proposal for the Univaq podcast to feature a series of interventions by research PhD students across various scientific areas and schools. The initiative aligns with the goal to narrate the life of an important and dynamic academic community. Seeking opinion and coordination for necessary steps from the coordinator of the podcast. No specific deadlines mentioned. todoist-labels:: #ai-generated #ai-generated-main-task todoist-status:: ◼️ -- [[2026-01-26]] JSSOFTWARE-D-25-01931 - todoist-id:: [6fPwRv3QpfVM6p4g](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fPwRv3QpfVM6p4g) - todoist-project:: #📜 REVIEWS - todoist-due:: 2026-01-26 - todoist-desc:: From: em@editorialmanager.com Received: 2025-12-01T12:45:47Z ✉: [Web Link](https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?ItemID=AAMkADM1NGNiNjk0LTY0ZGUtNDgzOC04MDM5LWNhODNkYWNjNjU4YwBGAAAAAACT6qp78kRgRKuUMBdWEga%2FBwCOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAAAAAEMAACOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAh7EZ0HAAA%3D&exvsurl=1&viewmodel=ReadMessageItem) --- Okay, here’s a summary of the email content, broken down into actionable steps, ready for a task description: **Task Summary:** The email is requesting a review of a manuscript titled "What Does Current Research Say About the Viability of Low-Code Development?" submitted to The Journal of Systems & Software by Dongmei Gao et al. The email emphasizes the importance of the review for the journal and provides clear instructions on how to proceed (agree, decline, or register a response). It also details the process of reviewing the manuscript, including a checklist of key areas to examine and the identification of contextual factors and potential benefits/challenges within LCD adoption. **Actionable Steps & Recommendations (as instructions for a task):** 1. **Review the Manuscript:** Carefully examine the paper for relevant details regarding Low-Code Development. Pay particular attention to the listed thematic areas – the benefits, challenges, and social aspects of LCD adoption. 2. **Confirm Review Agreement:** If you accept the review, click the link below: [https://track.editorialmanager.com/CL0/https://www.editorialmanager.com/jssoftware/](https://track.editorialmanager.com/CL0/https://www.editorialmanager.com/jssoftware/). 3. **Provide Feedback (if applicable):** If you are assigned a reviewer, please provide constructive feedback to ensure the manuscript receives the evaluation it deserves. Focus on the identified contextual factors and the strengths and weaknesses of the research. 4. **Reviewer Recognition:** Log into the Editorial Manager for The Journal of Systems & Software as a reviewer: [Editorial Manager®](https://www.editorialmanager.com/jssoftware/). You'll need your username: davide.diruscio@univaq.it. 5. **Respond to the Email:** Reply to the email stating your acceptance, decline or providing a response to the reviewers. 6. **Register Reviewer:** Register as a reviewer within the Editorial Manager: [https://www.reviewerrecognition.elsevier.com/](https://www.reviewerrecognition.elsevier.com/). Ensure you have your username (davide.diruscio@univaq.it) and password. 7. **Access Resources:** Utilize the provided resources: [Journal Article Publishing Support Center](https://help.elsevier.com/app/answers/list/p/7923) to learn about the Reviewer Hub, and [https://www.reviewerrecognition.elsevier.com/](https://www.reviewerrecognition.elsevier.com/) for more details about the review process. 8. **Follow Guidelines:** Carefully adhere to the Elsevier Reviewer Guidelines ([https://service.elsevier.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/14156/supporthub/publishing/
#REV_JSSOFTWARE#](https://service.elsevier.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/14156/supporthub/publishing/ Date: lun 19 gen 2026 alle ore 10:59 Subject: Decision on your submission todoist-status:: ◼️ -- [[2026-01-26]] [OpenCode | The open source AI coding agent](https://opencode.ai/) - todoist-id:: [6fpPgGfgM48RfhHg](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fpPgGfgM48RfhHg) +- [[2026-01-26]] slides meeting atene + todoist-id:: [6fr2GQCp5cqv68Rg](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fr2GQCp5cqv68Rg) todoist-project:: #Inbox todoist-due:: 2026-01-26 todoist-status:: ◼️ \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/pages/todoist___2026-01-27.md b/pages/todoist___2026-01-27.md index 3a97229c..8e584ded 100644 --- a/pages/todoist___2026-01-27.md +++ b/pages/todoist___2026-01-27.md @@ -72,4 +72,11 @@ todoist-project:: #🏢 Admin todoist-due:: 2026-01-27 todoist-desc:: From: donatella.donatelli@univaq.it Received: 2026-01-20T20:59:52Z ✉: [Web Link](https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?ItemID=AAMkADM1NGNiNjk0LTY0ZGUtNDgzOC04MDM5LWNhODNkYWNjNjU4YwBGAAAAAACT6qp78kRgRKuUMBdWEga%2FBwCOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAAAAAEMAACOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAidZtZoAAA%3D&exvsurl=1&viewmodel=ReadMessageItem) --- --- Caro Davide, per quanto riguarda la tempistica sui fondi RIA mi sono tenuta prudenzialmente un po’ larga nei tempi considerando che i bandi potrebbero essere tanti e non tutti i colleghi sono efficienti nell’inviare la documentazione alla segreteria. + todoist-status:: ◼️ +- [[2026-01-27]] GSSI Committee Documents – Draft Minutes and Regulation + todoist-id:: [6fVFH9Gfqgfh6cj8](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fVFH9Gfqgfh6cj8) + todoist-project:: #👷 WORK + todoist-due:: 2026-01-27 + todoist-desc:: [Web Link](https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?ItemID=AAkALgAAAAAAHYQDEapmEc2byACqAC%2FEWg0AjoVpQvBez0Ss5ZY2WGWEJgAIgIklWAAA&exvsurl=1&viewmodel=ReadMessageItem) Task Title: Review and Organize GSSI Committee Documents Task Description: Review and organize the draft minutes and regulations of the GSSI Committee to ensure accuracy, completeness, and ease of access. The task involves the following actions: 1. Download and open the email attachment containing the draft minutes and regulations. 2. Review the documents to verify their accuracy and completeness. Identify any discrepancies or inconsistencies and make necessary corrections. 3. Organize the documents in a logical and accessible manner, such as creating folders or tags for each document type (e.g., minutes, regulations, etc.). 4. Save the organized documents in a central location, such as a shared drive or cloud storage, to ensure easy accessibility for all committee members. 5. Notify the committee members of the availability of the organized documents and provide instructions on how to access them. 6. Maintain the documents and ensure they are up-to-date and current. Actionable Steps: 1. Download and open the email attachment containing the draft minutes and regulations. 2. Review the documents for accuracy and completeness. 3. Organize the documents in a logical and accessible manner. 4. Save the organized documents in a central location. 5. Notify committee members of the availability of the organized documents. 6. Maintain the documents and ensure they are up-to-date and current. + todoist-labels:: #outlook365 todoist-status:: ◼️ \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/pages/todoist___2026-01-28.md b/pages/todoist___2026-01-28.md index 71b38a38..d4ec12b0 100644 --- a/pages/todoist___2026-01-28.md +++ b/pages/todoist___2026-01-28.md @@ -16,4 +16,9 @@ todoist-project:: #📜 REVIEWS todoist-due:: 2026-01-28 todoist-desc:: From: onbehalfof@manuscriptcentral.com Received: 2026-01-12T07:28:14Z ✉: [Web Link](https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?ItemID=AAMkADM1NGNiNjk0LTY0ZGUtNDgzOC04MDM5LWNhODNkYWNjNjU4YwBGAAAAAACT6qp78kRgRKuUMBdWEga%2FBwCOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAAAAAEMAACOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAiX6FN1AAA%3D&exvsurl=1&viewmodel=ReadMessageItem) --- Okay, here’s a synthesis of the email content, transforming it into actionable tasks for completing the task of reviewing the manuscript. I’ve focused on clarity and providing specific steps. **Task Summary:** Review the IEEE Software manuscript ("SWSI-2026-01-0024") for adherence to peer review guidelines, focusing on confidentiality and providing substantive feedback. **Actionable Tasks & Breakdown:** 1. **Review Policies Understanding (Priority: High):** * **Action:** Thoroughly read the reviewer policies document (link: [https://magazines.ieeeauthorcenter.ieee.org/submit-your-article-for-peer-review/about-the-peer-review-process]) to understand the specific requirements for content, format, and communication. Pay close attention to the emphasis on confidentiality regarding AI-generated feedback. * **Deliverable:** A concise summary of key policy points – particularly concerning what constitutes acceptable or unacceptable review comments. 2. **Manuscript Review & Initial Assessment (Priority: High):** * **Action:** Begin reviewing the manuscript – specifically focusing on the sections related to the agentic system engineering context. Identify key sections: * **Abstract:** Ensure it accurately summarizes the manuscript's purpose and scope. * **Introduction:** Evaluate the relevance of the context engineering concept to the manuscript’s topic. * **Methodology:** Assess the methods used – are they appropriate for the context? * **Results & Discussion:** Confirm the results are logically supported by the methods. * **Conclusion:** Assess the final conclusion – is it justified and well-supported? * **Deliverable:** A brief (1-2 paragraph) summary of initial impressions, highlighting potential areas of concern (e.g., a lack of specific details, unclear methodology). 3. **Identify Key Concerns - Confidentiality & AI Feedback (Priority: Medium):** * **Action:** Specifically look for the sections where the reviewer emphasizes caution regarding sharing information about the manuscript with AI platforms for text generation. * **Deliverable:** A list of 2-3 *specific* concerns regarding the manuscript's use of AI-generated content, which you will need to address in your review. 4. **Content Review & Feedback (Priority: High):** * **Action:** Address the following points based on your concerns: * **Referencing:** Ensure all citations are accurate and properly formatted. * **Specificity:** Ensure claims are supported by evidence. * **Context:** Clarify the agentic system engineering context. Does it adequately demonstrate its significance? * **AI Integration:** Carefully assess the role and influence of AI. Does it feel like a supplementary tool or integral to the core work? (The reviewer’s concern about shared information is key here.) * **Deliverable:** Draft review comments addressing each identified concern, focusing on providing specific, constructive feedback. (Focus on the *why* behind your comments – not just stating the problem.) 5. **Review Score Sheet & Submission (Priority: Medium):** * **Action:** Carefully and accurately fill out the review score sheet, ensuring all sections are completed (Confidential Comments, Public Comments, and any other required fields). * **Deliverable:** Completed review score sheet, with all required fields filled. 6. **Communication Protocol (Priority: Medium):** * **Action:** Respond promptly to any questions from the editor or reviewer. Be professional and courteous. * **Deliverable:** A record of your communication attempts – noting the date, content, and outcome of each communication. 7. **Final Review & Submission (Priority: Low):** Once you've completed all steps, submit the manuscript for review. **Important Note:** Document *everything* – your reasoning behind the feedback, specific examples, and any changes made during the review process. This will provide a clear audit trail for future review decisions. --- Let me know if you'd like me to elaborate on any of these tasks or provide more specific examples! --- IEEE Software, SWSI-2026-01-0024 manuscript type: SWSI: Agentic System Engineering (Sep/Oct 2026) "Context Engineering for Software Engineering Agents" 12-Jan-2026 Dear Prof. Di Ruscio: Thank you for agreeing to review the above reference manus + todoist-status:: ◼️ +- [[2026-01-28]] [OpenCode | The open source AI coding agent](https://opencode.ai/) + todoist-id:: [6fpPgGfgM48RfhHg](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fpPgGfgM48RfhHg) + todoist-project:: #Inbox + todoist-due:: 2026-01-28 todoist-status:: ◼️ \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/pages/todoist___2026-01-31.md b/pages/todoist___2026-01-31.md index dacd69a7..bbddd736 100644 --- a/pages/todoist___2026-01-31.md +++ b/pages/todoist___2026-01-31.md @@ -150,4 +150,9 @@ todoist-due:: 2026-01-31 todoist-desc:: Subject: TSC-2025-12-1606 - Reviewer Agreed (Di Ruscio) Sender: onbehalfof@manuscriptcentral.com Weblink: [Outlook](https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?ItemID=AAMkADM1NGNiNjk0LTY0ZGUtNDgzOC04MDM5LWNhODNkYWNjNjU4YwBGAAAAAACT6qp78kRgRKuUMBdWEga%2FBwCOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAAAAAEMAACOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAieJ1LQAAA%3D&exvsurl=1&viewmodel=ReadMessageItem) Content Summary: You have agreed to review the manuscript titled "API Recommendation based on Consensus Learning for Novice Programmers" for Transactions on Services Computing (Manuscript ID: TSC-2025-12-1606). This is a Regular Paper. The review completion deadline is 20-Feb-2026. Subtasks: 1. Read and understand the reviewer policies at [Reviewer Guidelines for IEEE Computer Society Publications](https://www.computer.org/publications/reviewer-resources) before starting the review. 2. Confirm no conflicts of interest with the authors as described. 3. Access the manuscript using the provided link or log in at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tsc-cs with your User ID davide.diruscio@univaq.it. 4. Follow the steps to access the manuscript in the Reviewer Center: Log in -> Reviewer Center -> Review and Score queue -> Select 'Continue Review' from the Action drop-down menu. 5. Complete the review, answering all form questions and placing comments appropriately: Comments to Editor, Comments to Author. 6. Attach comments files if needed using the appropriate buttons for Author/Editor or Editor only. 7. Save progress if exiting before final submission; submit review via the Submit button when done. 8. Do not reveal your identity or share manuscript content with public AI platforms. 9. Report any conflicts, suspicions of duplicate publication, fabrication, or plagiarism immediately to the editor. 10. Contact tsc@computer.org for extension requests or access issues. 11. Utilize additional resources from the ScholarOne Manuscripts Reviewer's Guide. Please keep all communications confidential and comply with IEEE Policy 6.4.1.C. Thank you for your valuable contribution. If you have questions, contact Dr. Nitin Auluck at nitin@iitrpr.ac.in. todoist-labels:: #ai-generated-main-task + todoist-status:: ◼️ +- [[2026-01-31]] [📢 NEWS FLASH - NEW FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES: Including Horizon Europe 2026-2027 Work Programmes (worth €14 billion) Published 1) HORIZON EUROPE 2026-27 WORK PROGRAMMES, CALLS & EU INFODAYS 👉 All… …](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/jo-frost-15936423_news-flash-new-funding-opportunities-activity-7404829038617337856-Jrt8?utm_source=social_share_send&utm_medium=android_app&rcm=ACoAAACaoXoBMvdj060syLix4vC3rwOgjAE9MpU&utm_campaign=share_via) + todoist-id:: [6fVGR9pwQP92rGj8](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fVGR9pwQP92rGj8) + todoist-project:: #🚀 Projects + todoist-due:: 2026-01-31 todoist-status:: ◼️ \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/pages/todoist___2026-02-02.md b/pages/todoist___2026-02-02.md index 82474d4a..36f3567d 100644 --- a/pages/todoist___2026-02-02.md +++ b/pages/todoist___2026-02-02.md @@ -20,4 +20,9 @@ todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT todoist-due:: 2026-02-02 todoist-desc:: From: vittorio.cortellessa@univaq.it Received: 2025-11-19T10:25:22Z ✉: [Web Link](https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?ItemID=AAMkADM1NGNiNjk0LTY0ZGUtNDgzOC04MDM5LWNhODNkYWNjNjU4YwBGAAAAAACT6qp78kRgRKuUMBdWEga%2FBwCOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAAAAAEMAACOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAh0UWjJAAA%3D&exvsurl=1&viewmodel=ReadMessageItem) --- The email is written in Italian and contains the following sentences: * "Siccome lo sto facendo per Napoli, una cosa del genere non mi sembra male" (Literally translated to English as "Since I'm doing it for Naples, something of this kind doesn't seem bad to me") * "da adottare anche per i nostri reviewers esterni, che dici?" (Literally translated to English as "to adopt also for our external reviewers, what do you think?") * "Ciao, Vic" (Literally translated to English as "Hi, Vic") * "
" (A break tag) * "Vittorio Cortellessa, Ph.D." (The sender's name and title) * "DISIM - Universita' dell'Aquila" (The sender's institution) * "Via Vetoio, 1 - Coppito" (The sender's address) * "67010 L'Aquila, Italy" (The sender's location) * "(+39) 0862-433165" (The sender's phone number) * "vittorio.cortellessa@univaq.it" (The sender's email address) * "https://www.disim.univaq.it/VittorioCortellessa/261" (The sender's website link) Based on the content of the email, it appears to be a professional communication written in Italian, possibly for work-related purposes. --- Siccome lo sto facendo per Napoli, una cosa del genere non mi sembra male da adottare anche per i nostri reviewers esterni, che dici? Ciao, Vic --------------------------------------- Vittorio Cortellessa, Ph.D. DISIM - Universita' dell'Aqui + todoist-status:: ◼️ +- [[2026-02-02]] Pensare alla questione gestione Reference Group 2.2 + todoist-id:: [6fhqXvj7Mj8hXmM9](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fhqXvj7Mj8hXmM9) + todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT + todoist-due:: 2026-02-02 todoist-status:: ◼️ \ No newline at end of file