Auto saved by Logseq

2025-06-02 17:15:13 +02:00
commit d9ea3d552d
6279 changed files with 711145 additions and 0 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+type::  [[meeting]]
+external-links::  [meet.google.com/yos-jwti-zmv](http://meet.google.com/yos-jwti-zmv)
+tags:: #PROJECTS/PRIN-EMELIOT 
+people:: [[people/mariani]] [[people/felicien]] [[people/danielamariani]] [[people/claudio]] [[people/juri]] [[people/riccardo]] 
+date:: [[23-09-2022]]
+isconsortium:: false
+
+	- Avevamo condiviso i seguenti paper prima del meeting di oggi
+		- [[@MontiThings: Model-Driven Development and Deployment of Reliable IoT Applications]]
+		- ![COLA-Supporting_the_model_based_safety_analysis_for_safety_critical_IoT_systems.pdf](../assets/COLA-Supporting_the_model_based_safety_analysis_for_safety_critical_IoT_systems_1663917284399_0.pdf)
+	- [[people/felicien]] fa una DEMO
+		- ![image.png](../assets/image_1663918775774_0.png){:height 668, :width 766}
+		- ![image.png](../assets/image_1663918795299_0.png)
+		- ![image.png](../assets/image_1663918891519_0.png)
+			- The final goal is analyze possible failures
+		- ### Failure analysis
+			- After the specification of the components, we can add annotations for failure analysis purposes
+				- ![image.png](../assets/image_1663919079954_0.png)
+				- ![image.png](../assets/image_1663919297747_0.png)
+			- Questions from [[people/mariani]]
+				- No values can be not a problem, but if no values persist for a long time, then we can have a probalem. Does the language support this?
+					- The answer is no.
+				- How do you know that we are complete with respect to all the possible cases that need to specified
+					- We need a document of failures that can happen at the beginning of the process.
+					- In any case, we can also check the existing specification with respect to all the possible combinations that we could enumerate
+				- Do you have to enumerate all the possible failure combinations for each combination? Or can we specify the potential failures singularly, and then the system infers all the obvious combinations?
+			- Questions from [[people/danielamariani]]
+				- Do you have support correlation among faliures?
+					- The answer is yes, look at the example below
+						- ![image.png](../assets/image_1663920230021_0.png)
+				-
+		- ### System design
+			- ![image.png](../assets/image_1663920775858_0.png)
+			-
+			-
+-
+- type:: [[meeting]]
+  external-links:: 
+  tags:: 
+  people:: #people/imran #people/Vittorio_Cortellessa #people/riccardo #people/traini
+  tags:: 
+  date:: [[23-09-2022]] [[03-10-2022]]
+	- ### Tools to perform static analysis on source code
+		- SonarQube
+		- SonarGraph
+		- Understand by SciTools
+			- Different kinds of metrics at different level, like project, OO, etc.
+				- #people/imran focused on
+					- Cyclomatic
+					- CountInput
+						- FANIN
+					- CountOutput
+						- FANOUT
+		- scrML
+			- Maybe count for loops
+		- JDT
+	- ### Discussion
+		- Possibly perform a survey with tdevelopers of JMH #Ideas from #people/imran
+		- Suggesting new projects that have not been analyzed (from a performance point of view) and recommend what to analyze #Ideas from #people/Vittorio_Cortellessa
+		- Collect all the metrics for each method and check if there is a correlation with existing JMH benchmarks #Ideas
+			- In the case of functions that use other functions, we said to stop analyzing the first layer
+		-
+	-
+	-
+	-
+	-
+- Esame Alessandro di Matteo e Giulia Scoccia
+	- [Appello 14/09/2022](onenote:[OneDrive](https://d.docs.live.net/a33324427a144a54/Documenti/Blocco%20appunti%20di%20Davide/Services/DIDATTICA/SEAS/SEAS%2021_22.one#Appello%2014/09/2022&section-id={CFCF655E-E913-45C4-BE60-817E6B6F7CF9}&page-id={B29FADE0-095D-4DF5-B05D-17EE23D38D8B}&end))  ([visualizzazione Web](https://onedrive.live.com/view.aspx?resid=A33324427A144A54%21464&id=documents&wd=target%28Services%2FDIDATTICA%2FSEAS%2FSEAS%2021_22.one%7CCFCF655E-E913-45C4-BE60-817E6B6F7CF9%2FAppello%2014%5C%2F09%5C%2F2022%7CB29FADE0-095D-4DF5-B05D-17EE23D38D8B%2F%29))
+- [[Meeting EY]]
+-