ddiruscio/logseq
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Auto saved by Logseq

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Davide Di Ruscio
2025-06-02 17:15:13 +02:00
commit d9ea3d552d
6279 changed files with 711145 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
pages/SATToSE_2023_paper_1.md
+30
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
type:: [[REVIEWS]]
tags:: [[github actions]] [[preliminary study]]
year:: 2023
venue:: [[SATTOSE]]
full-title:: A Preliminary Study of GitHub Actions Dependencies
date-start:: [[04-05-2023]] - 10:34
date-submitted::
file:: ![SATToSE_2023_paper_1.pdf](../assets/SATToSE_2023_paper_1_1683189313287_0.pdf)
external-links::
status:: [[DONE]]
- [[Highlights]]
- ((64537082-9991-4f1a-bca2-9a1f45f753a8))
- ((645370e4-a9dd-4d3e-999b-9462be22f53d))
- ((64537bd9-b2f8-4345-821c-515737f7e382)) #card
id:: 65c8d476-0a2b-46da-b420-8dbab5cb5005
- GitHub Actions is a GitHub technology providing CI/CD [[SERVICES]] for automated building, testing, quality analysis, [[code]] [[Comments]], etc.
- ((64537c9b-64fd-4e72-b520-c5f84f8f6a8c))
- Empirical studies have found that GitHub Actions are becoming more popular than other CI/CD tools such as Travise, CircleCI, and Azure. Qualitative studies comprehending the underlying factors driving such a tranformation have also been performed.
- ==Configuring and debugging workflow files is one of the most common difficulties encountered [[by]] users of GitHub Actions.==
- [[Comments]]
- The [[paper]] presents an empirical analysis to answer two research [[GOALS]], i.e., characterizing Actions that are available in the GitHub marketplace, and analyzing the dependency characteristics of GitHub Actions, [[by]] distinguishing those in JavaScript, in Docker, and composite ones.
- I enjoyed reading this [[paper]], which is well-written and structured. I like the way the [[authors]] have performed the study and the found insights are very relevant for the event
-
- RIVISTA
- This [[paper]] provides an empirical analysis that seeks to answer two research [[GOALS]]. Firstly, it characterizes the actions available in the GitHub marketplace. Secondly, it analyzes the dependency characteristics of GitHub Actions [[by]] distinguishing those in JavaScript, Docker, and composite ones.
- I found the [[paper]] to be well-written and structured, and I enjoyed reading it. The study is well-designed and conducted, and the insights determined [[by]] the [[authors]] are highly relevant to the event.
-
-
-