[logseq-plugin-git:commit] 2025-06-05T08:36:10.944Z

pages/INFSOF-D-23-00931R1.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+type:: [[REVIEWS]]
+tags:: 
+year:: 2024
+venue:: [[IST]] 
+full-title:: Understanding the Landscape of Software Modelling Assistants for MDSE tools: A Systematic Mapping
+date-start:: [[07-03-2024]] - 21:56
+date-submitted:: [[05-04-2024]] 
+external-links::
+status:: [[DONE]] 
+deadline:: [[28-03-2024]]
+file:: [INFSOF-D-23-00931_R1_reviewer.pdf](zotero://select/library/items/GBXF3IIH) {{zotero-imported-file GBXF3IIH, "INFSOF-D-23-00931_R1_reviewer.pdf"}}
+parent:: [[INFSOF-D-23-00931]]
+todoist:: https://app.todoist.com/showTask?id=7771363538
+
+	- ### [[Highlights]]
+	- ### [[Comments]]
+		- I thank the authors for their efforts in addressing the issues I raised in the first version of the paper. Overall, most of the comments have been addressed. I'm still not fully satisfied by the naming of the identified clusters, especially those for RQ1. To give an explanatory example of the terminology ambiguity:
+			- "TECHNIQUES are a set of GUIDELINES and TOOLS ..." So it seems that TECHNIQUES is a superset that includes GUIDELINES and TOOLS. Is this the case?
+		- I suggest that the authors solve the ambiguity with a minor revision.
+		-
+	- ### [[REVIEWS/Notes]]
+	- ### ❓️Questions
+		- {{query (and [[question]] [[INFSOF-D-23-00931R1]] )[[question]]}}
+		  query-table:: true
+		  query-properties:: [:block]
+-