diff --git a/journals/2026_01_29.md b/journals/2026_01_29.md
index 26b6d401..08bc11c3 100644
--- a/journals/2026_01_29.md
+++ b/journals/2026_01_29.md
@@ -34,21 +34,22 @@ boox-notes:: ![BOOX Notes](../assets/../../onyx/TabUltraCPro/Notepad/JOURNALING.
 					- You said that the datasets are necessary to train the model. But it is sure that the existing models are nothing to do with agents or multi-agent systems. Isn't it? [[question]]
 				- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769673122545_0.png)
 					- I think you should focus on the workflow benchmarks [[question]]
-			- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769673209665_0.png)
-				- This should be looked also for our [[Benchmarking framework]]
-				- How do you see this linked with the benchmarking functionalities of the repository? [[question]]
-				- https://zjunlp.github.io/project/WorFBench/
-			- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769673564213_0.png){:height 538, :width 921}
-			- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769673870219_0.png)
-			- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769673930716_0.png)
-			- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769674026611_0.png)
-			- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769674068587_0.png)
-			- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769674158359_0.png)
-			- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769674200531_0.png)
-				- How would you expect the query shown at slides 36 from working w.r.t. what we have seen yesterday? [[question]]
-					- This needs to be discusssed but the constraint based specifications will be trasleted as requests to the repository API
-			- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769674423475_0.png)
-				- For the consensus at certain point, humans might be involved. The reference agents will take care of this human-in-the-loop step
+				- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769673209665_0.png)
+					- This should be looked also for our [[Benchmarking framework]]
+					- How do you see this linked with the benchmarking functionalities of the repository? [[question]]
+					- https://zjunlp.github.io/project/WorFBench/
+				- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769673564213_0.png){:height 538, :width 921}
+				- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769673870219_0.png)
+				- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769673930716_0.png)
+				- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769674026611_0.png)
+				- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769674068587_0.png)
+				- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769674158359_0.png)
+				- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769674200531_0.png)
+					- How would you expect the query shown at slides 36 from working w.r.t. what we have seen yesterday? [[question]]
+						- This needs to be discusssed but the constraint based specifications will be trasleted as requests to the repository API
+				- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769674423475_0.png)
+					- For the consensus at certain point, humans might be involved. The reference agents will take care of this human-in-the-loop step
+				-
 			- ### **Questions**
 				- {{query (and [[question]] [[29-01-2026]] )[[question]]}}
 				  query-table:: true