[logseq-plugin-git:commit] 2026-01-24T20:57:26.373Z

pages/KaraKeep-Highlights.md

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 icon:: ✏️
-generation_time:: [[2026-01-24]] T18:00:02Z
+generation_time:: [[2026-01-24]] T20:00:02Z
 
 - # **TODOs and IDEAs**
 	- {{query (and [[TODO]] [[KaraKeep-Highlights]] (or [[Ideas]] [[KaraKeep-Highlights]]))}}

pages/todoist___2026-01-24.md

@@ -12,11 +12,6 @@
   todoist-due:: 2026-01-24
   todoist-desc:: From: onbehalfof@manuscriptcentral.com Received: 2026-01-16T07:57:33Z ✉: [Web Link](https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?ItemID=AAMkADM1NGNiNjk0LTY0ZGUtNDgzOC04MDM5LWNhODNkYWNjNjU4YwBGAAAAAACT6qp78kRgRKuUMBdWEga%2FBwCOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAAAAAEMAACOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAiamtsNAAA%3D&exvsurl=1&viewmodel=ReadMessageItem) --- Here's a summary of the email content and the actionable task: **Task Summary:** Review the revised manuscript "Towards AI-Native Software Engineering (SE 3.0): A Vision and a Challenge Roadmap" (TOSEM-2024-0255.R2) for ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology. The review is requested within 4 weeks of January 16, 2026. The review should include identifying any missing relevant papers from the reference list, providing full bibliographic details and justification for inclusion. **Actionable Task:** **Title:** Review Revised Manuscript: Towards AI-Native Software Engineering (SE 3.0) **Description:** Review the revised manuscript "Towards AI-Native Software Engineering (SE 3.0): A Vision and a Challenge Roadmap" (TOSEM-2024-0255.R2) for ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology. **Specific Actions:** * Access the manuscript at: `https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tosem?URL_MASK=b1b597dfe9c0465496d480062f7af386` * Log in to the reviewer center if you are a prior reviewer, or follow instructions to access the system. * Download the paper. * Upload your report directly in the system following the provided form template. * **Identify and list any relevant papers missing from the reference list.** For each missing paper, include: * Names of all authors * Full paper title * Full journal/book title where the paper was published * Year of publication * URL link to the paper (if available) * **Provide a justification for why each suggested source should be considered, referencing specific sections of the paper if possible.** * Review referee guidelines at `https://www.acm.org/publications/policies/peer-review`. **Deadline:** * **February 13, 2026** (4 weeks from January 16, 2026) --- 16-Jan-2026 Dear Dr. Di Ruscio, Thank you for agreeing to review (within 4 weeks) the revised version of the paper submitted for possible publication to Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology: Towards AI-Native Software Engineering
   todoist-status:: ◼️
-- [[2026-01-24]] Provare ad installare email server trasformare topohost [diruscio.org](https://diruscio.org) come dns solo
-  todoist-id:: [6fmMRwHC35PGgP5X](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fmMRwHC35PGgP5X)
-  todoist-project:: #🧓🏻 DIY
-  todoist-due:: 2026-01-24
-  todoist-status:: ◼️
 - [[2026-01-24]] ECMFA 2026 submission assignment
   todoist-id:: [6ffWC97GGvHG4qG8](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6ffWC97GGvHG4qG8)
   todoist-project:: #📜 REVIEWS
@@ -30,12 +25,6 @@
   todoist-due:: 2026-01-24
   todoist-desc:: From: onbehalfof@manuscriptcentral.com Received: 2026-01-08T15:15:16Z ✉: [Web Link](https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?ItemID=AAMkADM1NGNiNjk0LTY0ZGUtNDgzOC04MDM5LWNhODNkYWNjNjU4YwBGAAAAAACT6qp78kRgRKuUMBdWEga%2FBwCOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAAAAAEMAACOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAiVbuR5AAA%3D&exvsurl=1&viewmodel=ReadMessageItem) --- Okay, here's a summary of the email, formatted as a task description with actionable steps: **Task: Review Manuscript - 'Evaluating Incompatible Third-party Library API Usage in LLM-based Code Completion'** **Objective:** To thoroughly review the provided manuscript titled "Evaluating Incompatible Third-party Library API Usage in LLM-based Code Completion" submitted to *Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology*. **Instructions:** 1. **Locate Manuscript:** Access the manuscript at: * [ScholarOne Manuscripts](https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tosem?URL_MASK=f8e067daf3c948909c391290bf2da5b7) * Alternatively, access the manuscript through the system at: [http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tosem (in the reviewer center)] 2. **System Login & Paper Download:** Follow the instructions to log in to the system and download the manuscript. 3. **Review and Identify Missing Literature:** * Identify any relevant literature that is missing from the reference list. * For each relevant paper: * Collect the names of all authors. * Retrieve the paper title. * Retrieve the journal/book title where the paper was published. * Find the year of publication. * Obtain the URL link to the paper. * Justify why this source is relevant – highlight a key aspect or contribution. 4. **Report Generation:** Create a report summarizing your findings, including the bibliographic information of the relevant literature. 5. **Report Formatting:** Use the provided template for report formatting. **Deliverable:** A completed report containing the collected bibliographic information and justification for the identified literature. **Notes:** The primary focus is on verifying the accuracy and completeness of the manuscript's bibliographic information and identifying potential missing sources of literature. Ensure the report highlights key findings and is well-organized. --- 08-Jan-2026 Dear Dr. Di Ruscio, Thank you for agreeing to review the following paper submitted for possible publication to Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology: Evaluating Incompatible Third-party Library API Usage in LLM-based Co
   todoist-status:: ◼️
-- [[2026-01-24]] Sito MODES: primo draft
-  todoist-id:: [6fCrg62G5wXpxXqc](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fCrg62G5wXpxXqc)
-  todoist-project:: #📧EmailsToAnswer
-  todoist-due:: 2026-01-24
-  todoist-desc:: From: juri.dirocco@univaq.it Received: 2025-11-05T16:34:03Z ✉: [Web Link](https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?ItemID=AAMkADM1NGNiNjk0LTY0ZGUtNDgzOC04MDM5LWNhODNkYWNjNjU4YwBGAAAAAACT6qp78kRgRKuUMBdWEga%2FBwCOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAAAAAEMAACOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAhreqlnAAA%3D&exvsurl=1&viewmodel=ReadMessageItem) --- Ciao a tutti, a tempo perso ho cominciato a buttar giù il sito del laboratorio modes [MODES Lab](https://modes-laboratory.github.io/) E’ parametrizzato in base alle collezioni di dati, quindi possiamo lavorarci sui contenuti senza modificare il sito. Se Alf fa una
-  todoist-status:: ◼️
 - [[2026-01-24]] Studiare nuovi regolamenti su incarichi di ricerca e post-doc
   todoist-id:: [6fFFQ9v3PM5g4qJ8](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fFFQ9v3PM5g4qJ8)
   todoist-project:: #🏢 Admin
@@ -48,11 +37,6 @@
   todoist-due:: 2026-01-24
   todoist-desc:: From: donatella.donatelli@univaq.it Received: 2026-01-20T20:59:52Z ✉: [Web Link](https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?ItemID=AAMkADM1NGNiNjk0LTY0ZGUtNDgzOC04MDM5LWNhODNkYWNjNjU4YwBGAAAAAACT6qp78kRgRKuUMBdWEga%2FBwCOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAAAAAEMAACOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAidZtZoAAA%3D&exvsurl=1&viewmodel=ReadMessageItem) --- --- Caro Davide, per quanto riguarda la tempistica sui fondi RIA mi sono tenuta prudenzialmente un po’ larga nei tempi considerando che i bandi potrebbero essere tanti e non tutti i colleghi sono efficienti nell’inviare la documentazione alla segreteria.
   todoist-status:: ◼️
-- [[2026-01-24]] [Stalwart Mail Server | Stalwart Labs](https://stalw.art/mail-server/)
-  todoist-id:: [6fqFM3gpHGP3mWjg](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fqFM3gpHGP3mWjg)
-  todoist-project:: #🧓🏻 DIY
-  todoist-due:: 2026-01-24
-  todoist-status:: ◼️
 - [[2026-01-24]] [[PAPERS/J-Collaborative-Development]]
   todoist-id:: [6fmMjW88FQ9m8x2g](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fmMjW88FQ9m8x2g)
   todoist-project:: #✏️ PAPERS

pages/todoist___2026-01-25.md

@@ -87,4 +87,9 @@
   todoist-id:: [6fqFgJPRQHf9hcGg](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fqFgJPRQHf9hcGg)
   todoist-project:: #👨‍🏫 Teaching
   todoist-due:: 2026-01-25
+  todoist-status:: ◼️
+- [[2026-01-25]] Registrazione contratto Corsigani
+  todoist-id:: [6fjWHCmHqGFFvMvF](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fjWHCmHqGFFvMvF)
+  todoist-project:: #📗 Personal
+  todoist-due:: 2026-01-25
   todoist-status:: ◼️

pages/todoist___2026-01-27.md

@@ -23,4 +23,23 @@
   todoist-id:: [6fqc64FQRcRjgVRG](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fqc64FQRcRjgVRG)
   todoist-project:: #🚀 Projects-EU-MOSAICO
   todoist-due:: 2026-01-27
+  todoist-status:: ◼️
+- [[2026-01-27]] R: Aggiornamento Paper DRAMA: Nuova Metodologia e Risultati
+  todoist-id:: [6fW295wjFjqGj5c8](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fW295wjFjqGj5c8)
+  todoist-project:: #✏️ PAPERS
+  todoist-due:: 2026-01-27
+  todoist-desc:: [Web Link](https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?ItemID=AAkALgAAAAAAHYQDEapmEc2byACqAC%2FEWg0AjoVpQvBez0Ss5ZY2WGWEJgAIg57bhwAA&exvsurl=1&viewmodel=ReadMessageItem) Okay, here’s a task description for the email “R: Aggiornamento Paper DRAMA: Nuova Metodologia e Risultati,” crafted with actionable steps, aiming to help someone understand and complete the task: **Task Title:** Finalize & Share the DRAMA Paper Update **Description:** This task focuses on finalizing the updated DRAMA paper and ensuring it’s presented effectively to stakeholders. It involves reviewing the document, incorporating feedback, and preparing it for distribution. **Actionable Steps:** 1. **Review the Document:** Carefully read the entire updated DRAMA paper. Pay particular attention to the section regarding [Specifically mention the key section or data point the paper focuses on - e.g., methodology, results, conclusions]. 2. **Gather Feedback:** Share the document with [Assignee - specify who needs to review it - e.g., Team Lead, Senior Analyst]. Actively solicit feedback on clarity, accuracy, and completeness. 3. **Address Feedback:** Respond to each piece of feedback received. Document all changes made based on feedback. Prioritize revisions based on the severity of the feedback. 4. **Incorporate Changes:** Implement the necessary revisions to ensure the document accurately reflects the updated methodology and results. 5. **Draft a Summary/Executive Summary:** Create a concise executive summary highlighting the key takeaways, the updated methodology, and the most significant results (approximately [Specify length – e.g., 1-2 paragraphs]). 6. **Finalize & Format:** Ensure the document is properly formatted, including consistent headings, tables, figures, and citations. 7. **Prepare for Distribution:** Choose the appropriate distribution method (e.g., email, shared drive, presentation). Consider adding a brief introductory paragraph explaining the update. 8. **Proofread:** Conduct a final proofread to catch any errors before final submission. **Priority:** Medium - This task requires focused effort and attention to detail. **Due Date:** [Specify a realistic deadline – e.g., End of Day Tomorrow] **Notes:** If you have any specific areas you’d like me to focus on during the review, please let me know. --- **To help me refine this further and make it *even* better, could you tell me:** * **Who is the intended audience for this task?** (e.g., Team, Management, Clients?) * **What is the *specific* goal of the updated paper?** (e.g., present a new strategy, demonstrate improved efficiency, provide data insights?)
+  todoist-labels:: #outlook365
+  todoist-status:: ◼️
+- [[2026-01-27]] Pubblicazione Decreto di rettifica dell'Avviso per la presentazione di Progetti di Ateneo per la Ricerca di Base e Avvio alla Ricerca per l'anno 2026
+  todoist-id:: [6ffgFx5M2VMWVhQ8](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6ffgFx5M2VMWVhQ8)
+  todoist-project:: #🔭 Services-Commissione-Ricerca-DISIM
+  todoist-due:: 2026-01-27
+  todoist-desc:: From: proget@strutture.univaq.it Received: 2025-12-22T14:22:50Z ✉: [Web Link](https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?ItemID=AAMkADM1NGNiNjk0LTY0ZGUtNDgzOC04MDM5LWNhODNkYWNjNjU4YwBGAAAAAACT6qp78kRgRKuUMBdWEga%2FBwCOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAAAAAEMAACOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAiOPS6ZAAA%3D&exvsurl=1&viewmodel=ReadMessageItem) --- Okay, here's a synthesis of the email content, summarized and designed to be actionable, focusing on the key information and suggesting steps: **Task Summary:** The email is a formal announcement regarding the completion of a project proposal ("Avviso per la presentazione di Progetti..."). It's requesting confirmation of receipt and potentially a preliminary review. **Detailed Breakdown & Actionable Steps:** 1. **Confirmation of Receipt:** *Immediately* confirm you’ve received the email. If you haven’t, contact the sender (Luisa De Matteis) via email. 2. **Understand the Content:** The email highlights the crucial point that the project proposal ("Progetti di Ateneo") has been published and is awaiting review. The key elements are: * **Official Publication:** It was published at the Albo ufficiale di Ateneo. * **Ricerca - Finanziamenti di Ateneo:** It is related to funding and research initiatives within the Ateneo University. * **Due Diligence Required:** It's essential to review the proposal thoroughly. 3. **Recommended Actions - Initial Review & Contact:** * **Review the Proposal:** Carefully read the entire document. Understand the scope, goals, and deliverables. * **Contact the Sender (Luisa De Matteis):** Send a polite email requesting a brief overview of the proposal. Specifically state your intention to review it and any initial questions you have. Ask for a preliminary assessment of the document’s completeness and relevance to your team. 4. **Specific Questions to Ask (Based on the Email's Context - these are crucial):** * What is the stated purpose/goal of the project? * What specific areas require the most attention during the review? * Are there any attachments or supplementary materials that are needed? 5. **Legal Compliance & Disclaimers:** Before proceeding, review the email for the disclaimer concerning data privacy. Ensure your actions comply with all relevant legal requirements regarding the handling of sensitive project information. 6. **Documentation:** Keep a record of your communication with Luisa De Matteis and the email itself. --- **To help me refine this further and tailor it to a specific scenario, could you tell me:** * What is the role of the recipient? (e.g., Project Manager, Researcher, Legal Counsel?) * What is the project being reviewed? (A general idea is helpful.) --- Gentilissime e gentilissimi, vi inoltriamo il Decreto di rettifica dell'Avviso per la presentazione di Progetti di Ateneo per la Ricerca di Base e Avvio alla Ricerca per l'anno 2026. Il presente documento è stato pubblicato all'Albo ufficiale di Ateneo
+  todoist-status:: ◼️
+- [[2026-01-27]] R: Update esperimento
+  todoist-id:: [6fhrXjjRcmR6HRc8](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fhrXjjRcmR6HRc8)
+  todoist-project:: #✏️ PAPERS
+  todoist-due:: 2026-01-27
+  todoist-desc:: From: juri.dirocco@univaq.it Received: 2026-01-08T16:55:29Z ✉: [Web Link](https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?ItemID=AAMkADM1NGNiNjk0LTY0ZGUtNDgzOC04MDM5LWNhODNkYWNjNjU4YwBGAAAAAACT6qp78kRgRKuUMBdWEga%2FBwCOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAAAAAEMAACOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAiVbuSJAAA%3D&exvsurl=1&viewmodel=ReadMessageItem) --- --- Ciao a tutti, Ecco come avevo pensato di dividere i compiti: * Introduction: Daniela, Davide, Leonardo * Motivation (and motivating example): Diego, Maria Teresa, Daniela , Davide e Leonardo, * Approach: Juri e Claudio * Evaluation: Ju
   todoist-status:: ◼️