progress:: {{renderer :todomaster}}
icon:: 📅
boox-notes:: ![BOOX Notes](../assets/../../onyx/TabUltraCPro/Notepad/JOURNALING.pdf)

	- ### Tasks
		- {{query (and (task TODO) [[29-01-2026]])}}
		  query-table:: true
		  query-properties:: [:block]
		- ...
	- ### Notes
		- Meeting CM3 [[PROJECTS/MOSAICO]]
		  type:: [[meeting]]
			- WP4
				- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769671414296_0.png)
				- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769671513452_0.png)
				- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769671605759_0.png)
				- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769671708456_0.png)
				- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769671875745_0.png)
				- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769672175935_0.png)
					- How can we position BDI with what has been done so far? [[question]]
				- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769672400208_0.png)
					- Keep an eye on the deliverable [[Deliverable D3.2]] which is on collaboration pattern as shown below
				- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769672456745_0.png)
				- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769672504982_0.png)
					- How do we link with languages like BPMN? [[question]]
						- Ok answered below
				- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769672608482_0.png)
				- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769672674672_0.png)
				- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769672788052_0.png)
					- This seems to be like too high-level
				- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769672886870_0.png)
				- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769672971263_0.png)
				- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769673005517_0.png)
					- You said that the datasets are necessary to train the model. But it is sure that the existing models are nothing to do with agents or multi-agent systems. Isn't it? [[question]]
				- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769673122545_0.png)
					- I think you should focus on the workflow benchmarks [[question]]
				- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769673209665_0.png)
					- This should be looked also for our [[Benchmarking framework]]
					- How do you see this linked with the benchmarking functionalities of the repository? [[question]]
					- https://zjunlp.github.io/project/WorFBench/
				- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769673564213_0.png){:height 538, :width 921}
				- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769673870219_0.png)
				- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769673930716_0.png)
				- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769674026611_0.png)
				- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769674068587_0.png)
				- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769674158359_0.png)
				- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769674200531_0.png)
					- How would you expect the query shown at slides 36 from working w.r.t. what we have seen yesterday? [[question]]
						- This needs to be discusssed but the constraint based specifications will be trasleted as requests to the repository API
				- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769674423475_0.png)
					- For the consensus at certain point, humans might be involved. The reference agents will take care of this human-in-the-loop step
				- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769675036866_0.png)
				- ![image.png](../assets/image_1769675098624_0.png)
				-
			- ### **Questions**
				- {{query (and [[question]] [[29-01-2026]] )[[question]]}}
				  query-table:: true
				  query-properties:: [:block]