progress:: {{renderer :todomaster}} icon:: 📅 boox-notes:: ![BOOX Notes](../assets/../../onyx/TabUltraCPro/Notepad/JOURNALING.pdf) - ### Tasks - {{query (and (task TODO) [[29-01-2026]])}} query-table:: true query-properties:: [:block] - ... - ### Notes - Meeting CM3 [[PROJECTS/MOSAICO]] type:: [[meeting]] - WP3 collapsed:: true - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769671414296_0.png) - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769671513452_0.png) - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769671605759_0.png) - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769671708456_0.png) - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769671875745_0.png) - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769672175935_0.png) - How can we position BDI with what has been done so far? [[question]] - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769672400208_0.png) - Keep an eye on the deliverable [[Deliverable D3.2]] which is on collaboration pattern as shown below - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769672456745_0.png) - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769672504982_0.png) - How do we link with languages like BPMN? [[question]] - Ok answered below - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769672608482_0.png) - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769672674672_0.png) - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769672788052_0.png) - This seems to be like too high-level - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769672886870_0.png) - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769672971263_0.png) - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769673005517_0.png) - You said that the datasets are necessary to train the model. But it is sure that the existing models are nothing to do with agents or multi-agent systems. Isn't it? [[question]] - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769673122545_0.png) - I think you should focus on the workflow benchmarks [[question]] - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769673209665_0.png) - This should be looked also for our [[Benchmarking framework]] - How do you see this linked with the benchmarking functionalities of the repository? [[question]] - https://zjunlp.github.io/project/WorFBench/ - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769673564213_0.png){:height 538, :width 921} - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769673870219_0.png) - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769673930716_0.png) - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769674026611_0.png) - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769674068587_0.png) - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769674158359_0.png) - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769674200531_0.png) - How would you expect the query shown at slides 36 from working w.r.t. what we have seen yesterday? [[question]] - This needs to be discusssed but the constraint based specifications will be trasleted as requests to the repository API - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769674423475_0.png) - For the consensus at certain point, humans might be involved. The reference agents will take care of this human-in-the-loop step - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769675036866_0.png) - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769675098624_0.png) - ACL - Agent Communication Library - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769675185370_0.png) - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769675290508_0.png) - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769675381847_0.png) - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769675404747_0.png) - They have developed a small DSL to specify what the agent does and they have also developed a transformation to generate the corresponding agent card. - It seems we can simplify the agent data model by removing attributes related to BDI [[Notes]] - WP4 collapsed:: true - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769677103771_0.png) - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769677121726_0.png) - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769677210875_0.png) - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769677271502_0.png) - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769677335081_0.png) - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769677469777_0.png) - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769677481214_0.png) - "Run-time" metamodel - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769677543799_0.png) - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769677563832_0.png) - Kubernetes becasuse they have an explicit governance process. - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769677720969_0.png) - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769677755937_0.png) - That's interesting. Very few projects have an explicit governance process. - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769677843753_0.png) - Maybe this was not in 2015 - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769677975417_0.png) - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769678283609_0.png) - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769678392403_0.png) - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769678441623_0.png) - The idea is to translate this graphical notation towards more specific technologies like Claude-Flow, OpenAI Swarm, Langchain Deep Agents, etc. - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769678841659_0.png) - - WP5 - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769681054539_0.png) - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769681113918_0.png) - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769681169969_0.png) - It seems there is a problem with MS4 which is due at M18 even though in the description of work is due at M21 - It has been solved. At M18 we need to have all the components. At M21 we will have the first version of the integrated platform. - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769681296351_0.png) - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769681483919_0.png) - ![image.png](../assets/image_1769683956961_0.png) - - ### **Questions** - {{query (and [[question]] [[29-01-2026]] )[[question]]}} query-table:: true query-properties:: [:block]