type:: [[REVIEWS]]
tags:: 
year:: 2024
venue:: [[ICSE]] 
full-title:: 
date-start:: [[23-09-2024]] - 17:16
date-submitted::
external-links::
status:: [[DONE]] 
deadline-submission:: 
file:: [[@icse2025-paper1504]] 
parent:: [[icse2025-paper548]] 
todoist::

	- ### [[Highlights]]
		- Ecological validity refers to **the realism with which a design of evaluation setup matches the user's real work context**. #card
		  id:: 66f18c4d-23f7-4d32-b7e6-6bc786860145
	- ### [[Comments]]
		- The authors have done a significant work to improve the initial submission by adding a comparison of their approach with the baseline reviewers suggested. They also fixed the other issues reviewers identified. As a minor comment, I think the text on page 6 below RQ2.5 should go below RQ2 and vice-versa.
		  id:: 66f19226-182c-431a-b11f-5a2637dcdafb
	- ### [[REVIEWS/Notes]]
	- ### YELLOW CONCERNS
	  background-color:: yellow
		- {{query (and [[ffd400]] [[icse2025-paper1504]] )}}
		  collapsed:: true
	- ### ❓️Questions
		- {{query (and [[question]] [[icse2025-paper1504]] )[[question]]}}
		  query-table:: true
		  query-properties:: [:block]