Files
logseq/pages/PROJECTS___MOSAICO___WP2.md

2.9 KiB

Meetings

- **Meeting [[04-07-2025]]**
	- type::  [[meeting]]
	  external-links::  
	  tags:: 
	  people:: 
	  date:: [[04-07-2025]] - 11:44
	  duration::
	-
  • Deliverable D2.1

    • What we're envisioning is that the protocol exposes the information about the agents in a given agent server, which then can be easily consumed by your repository (for indexing). This is the same approach as A2A agent cards and as MCP tool descriptions. A single agent server only lists its own agents: the MOSAICO repository is the one that actually indexes all the agents available across all the servers.
    • I think this is needed, because I cannot imagine people going to a web interface and filling in form field after form field with all this information. A2A precisely does this so that they could do a type of web crawler that would go through "well-known URIs" (http://host/.well-known/agent.json) to find agents at will. In fact, I suspect your repository may need to do exactly this.
    • ✉: Web Link
  • MENTORING/TESISTI

    collapsed:: true
    • Marco Giarrusso
    • Mariama Celi S. de Oliveira
      • Rehearsal presentation
        • what about adding an explanatory workflow to show an orchestration of agents with Dify or AutoGPT?
      • Collaborative optimization task--> explain
      • Just motivate the choices for the configurations slide 8
      • Slide 9
        • too small
      • Slide 13
        • What do you mean with Each pipeline runs only once?
    • Motunrayo Ibiyo
      • Rehearsal presentation collapsed:: true
        • Mention MOSAICO at the beginning where we are studying the usage of LLM-based multi agent systems to support software engineering tasks
        • Very fast, reduce the content and speak slowly. Too many slides!!! You should cut half of them!!!
        • It's easy to get lost in the details
        • Slides 4
          • What are the limitations of existing approaches?
        • Slide 6
          • with-out (typo)
        • Slide 7
          • Put the updated reference
        • Slide 8
          • highlight the different components while presenting (one by one)
        • Slide 10
          • image.png
          • what does it mean?
        • Slide 11
          • Many typos
            • a file in the package is...
        • Slide 12
          • image.png
            • too many things
        • Slide 14
          • image.png
          • It's too much,
        • It's more beneficial presenting some explanatory examples instead of all these numbers, in line with what you have with slide 16.
    • TOOLS evaluated
      • Qualitative + Quantitative
        • AutoGen
        • AutoGPT
        • Dify
        • SemanticKernel
        • LlamaIndex
        • Heystack
      • Qualitative
        • Those from Motunrayoi