logseq/pages/todoist___2026-02-04.md

• 2026-02-04 PAPERS/J-Collaborative-Development todoist-id:: 6fmMjW88FQ9m8x2g todoist-project:: #✏️ PAPERS todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: WebLink: Outlook todoist-labels:: #goal #logseqed todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Aggiornamento uso fondi progetti todoist-id:: 6XwPqff8MCr394FX todoist-project:: #🏢 Admin todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-labels:: #logseqed todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Dottorati - PNRR: Conferma dati di monitoraggio, ciclo 38 todoist-id:: 6fV4f925QC5xJMH8 todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: Web Link Task Title: Monitoring Data Confirmation for Cycle 38 Description: The task is to confirm and validate the monitoring data for cycle 38 in accordance with the PNRR (National Recovery and Resilience Plan) guidelines. This involves reviewing and verifying the accuracy of the data provided by the stakeholders, including the local authorities, universities, and other relevant organizations. Actionable Steps: 1. Review the monitoring data provided by the stakeholders for cycle 38, ensuring it meets the PNRR guidelines. 2. Verify the accuracy of the data by cross-checking it with relevant sources, such as official records or direct communication with the stakeholders. 3. Identify any discrepancies or errors in the data and request corrections from the stakeholders as needed. 4. Document any issues or concerns regarding the data and provide recommendations for improvement. 5. Provide a summary of the confirmed monitoring data to the relevant authorities and stakeholders. 6. Maintain accurate records of the data confirmation process for future reference. By accomplishing these steps, you will have successfully confirmed and validated the monitoring data for cycle 38 in accordance with PNRR guidelines, ensuring that the data is accurate and reliable for decision-making purposes. todoist-labels:: #outlook365 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Dottorati - PNRR: Conferma dati di monitoraggio, ciclo 39 todoist-id:: 6fV4fHM64mx54fVg todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: Web Link Task Title: Monitoring Data Confirmation for Cycle 39 Task Description: Review and confirm the monitoring data provided in the email from Dottorati - PNRR for cycle 39. The task involves verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data, ensuring it meets the required standards, and confirming that all necessary information has been collected and recorded. Actionable Steps: 1. Open the email from Dottorati - PNRR and download the monitoring data file(s). 2. Review the data files to ensure they are complete and accurate, and that all required fields are filled in. 3. Identify any discrepancies or errors in the data and communicate them to the relevant parties for correction. 4. Confirm with Dottorati - PNRR that the data has been reviewed and approved. 5. Document the outcome of the data confirmation process, including any issues or discrepancies identified, and any actions taken to address them. 6. Update any relevant systems or databases with the confirmed monitoring data. 7. Notify stakeholders of the completed task and the status of the monitoring data. Estimated Time: 1-2 hours Priority Level: Medium Assign To: [Your Name] todoist-labels:: #outlook365 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Dottorati - PNRR: Conferma dati di monitoraggio, ciclo 38 todoist-id:: 6fh4WC4P82WVJMRg todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: From: no-reply@cineca.it Received: 2026-01-05T07:01:49Z ✉: Web Link --- Okay, here’s a synthesized task description based on the email content, focusing on actionable steps: Task: Verify and Finalize PNRR Project Monitoring Data Objective: Confirm and finalize the PNRR project monitoring data within the designated timeframe. Actionable Steps: 1. Confirm with Rector/Office of the Head: Remind the Subject Attuator (Rector/Office of the Head) that data for the 38th cycle of the PNRR program needs to be confirmed in the monitoring section of the scrivatory office (via the "conferma" button). This is due on January 10, 2026. 2. Access Data via PNRR Monitoring: Locate and access the "Visualizza dati monitoraggio" (View Monitoring Data) button in the scrivatory office. 3. Review & Verify Data: Examine the data presented within the "Visualizza dati monitoraggio" to ensure it accurately reflects the state of art for each PNRR investment project. 4. Issue Tickets for Support: If there are any operational issues or require support (“informatico”), proceed exclusively through opening support tickets to CINECA at: Richiesta Supporto 5. Confirmation: Ensure all the information provided is accurate and meets the requirements of the PNRR program. Note: This task is crucial for meeting the deadline and maintaining the accuracy of the PNRR project monitoring documentation. --- Let me know if you'd like me to refine this further (e.g., add specific instructions for troubleshooting, or prioritize certain actions). --- Si ricorda al Soggetto attuatore (Rettore/Ufficio Dottorati) che entro il giorno 10/01/2026, per il 38° ciclo è necessario confermare nella sezione dei dati di monitoraggio presente nella scrivania (cliccando sul tasto "conferma") i dati precedentemente i todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Dottorati - PNRR: Conferma dati di monitoraggio, ciclo 39 todoist-id:: 6fh4WC6m8MJGJ5Q8 todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: From: no-reply@cineca.it Received: 2026-01-05T07:02:36Z ✉: Web Link --- --- Si ricorda al Soggetto attuatore (Rettore/Ufficio Dottorati) che entro il giorno 10/01/2026, per il 39° ciclo è necessario confermare nella sezione dei dati di monitoraggio presente nella scrivania (cliccando sul tasto "conferma") i dati precedentemente i todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Giudizio Dottorandi RG2.2 in NOTION todoist-id:: 6fG5CgvFVwF3mR7h todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Organizzare Worskhop su AI / Agenti / Edge interagendo con SImone Gianfranceschi di Intecs todoist-id:: 6fQcCRJxh5pvMgrg todoist-project:: #📻​ Services-RadioLabs todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: Link to Logseq todoist-labels:: #source_logseq todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Contattare studenti restituzione portatili todoist-id:: 6f82x4WFg69Jmr99 todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Chiedere Donatella per Juri todoist-id:: 6frjgc5gjf6c98r8 todoist-project:: #🦮 Mentoring todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 TOSEM-2025-1288 - Reviewer agreed todoist-id:: 6fhqXj3C4Hm4fjR8 todoist-project:: #📜 REVIEWS todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: From: onbehalfof@manuscriptcentral.com Received: 2026-01-08T15:15:16Z ✉: Web Link --- Okay, here's a summary of the email, formatted as a task description with actionable steps: Task: Review Manuscript - 'Evaluating Incompatible Third-party Library API Usage in LLM-based Code Completion' Objective: To thoroughly review the provided manuscript titled "Evaluating Incompatible Third-party Library API Usage in LLM-based Code Completion" submitted to Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology. Instructions: 1. Locate Manuscript: Access the manuscript at: * ScholarOne Manuscripts * Alternatively, access the manuscript through the system at: [http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tosem (in the reviewer center)] 2. System Login & Paper Download: Follow the instructions to log in to the system and download the manuscript. 3. Review and Identify Missing Literature: * Identify any relevant literature that is missing from the reference list. * For each relevant paper: * Collect the names of all authors. * Retrieve the paper title. * Retrieve the journal/book title where the paper was published. * Find the year of publication. * Obtain the URL link to the paper. * Justify why this source is relevant – highlight a key aspect or contribution. 4. Report Generation: Create a report summarizing your findings, including the bibliographic information of the relevant literature. 5. Report Formatting: Use the provided template for report formatting. Deliverable: A completed report containing the collected bibliographic information and justification for the identified literature. Notes: The primary focus is on verifying the accuracy and completeness of the manuscript's bibliographic information and identifying potential missing sources of literature. Ensure the report highlights key findings and is well-organized. --- 08-Jan-2026 Dear Dr. Di Ruscio, Thank you for agreeing to review the following paper submitted for possible publication to Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology: Evaluating Incompatible Third-party Library API Usage in LLM-based Co todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Tosem-2024-0255.R2 - Revised Version todoist-id:: 6fmfrW83479F5cfc todoist-project:: #📜 REVIEWS todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: Weblink: Outlook Email Content Summary: You are requested to review the revised version of the paper titled "Towards AI-Native Software Engineering (SE 3.0): A Vision and a Challenge Roadmap" submitted to Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM) with manuscript ID TOSEM-2024-0255.R2. The review is to be completed within 4 weeks. Links to the manuscript system where you can download the paper, update your information, access previous review comments, and submit your review report are provided. Please identify missing relevant papers in the references and include comprehensive bibliographic information in your review report. For any login issues, contact atemplet@gmail.com. Referee guidelines are available at https://www.acm.org/publications/policies/peer-review. This task is assigned considering your role as Davide Di Ruscio, coordinator of the PhD in ICT program at the University of L'Aquila. todoist-labels:: #ai-generated #ai-generated-main-task todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 🧠​​ EASE 2026 Research Papers Track todoist-id:: 6frFf4WCxMV283m6 todoist-project:: #📜 REVIEWS todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: Subject: [EASE 2026] Research Papers Track Paper Assignment Sender: ease2026@easychair.org Weblink: Outlook Summary: You are assigned to review 226 research papers for EASE 2026, with an expected load of 5-6 papers each. Access the submissions via EasyChair for EASE 2026. Main Instructions: - Provide positive and constructive reviews focusing on novelty, significance, soundness, verifiability, transparency, and presentation. - Follow the IEEE Code of Conduct and optionally refer to the Empirical Standards Checklist. - Use the scoring system: strong accept, accept, weak accept, weak reject, reject. Lead Reviewer Responsibilities (if designated): - Initiate and drive the discussion to reach consensus. - Check reviews for issues and request changes. - Write a meta-review summarizing discussion and rationale without revealing reviewer identities. Deadlines (AoE): - Paper assignment: January 27th - Reviews due: February 26th - Online discussion and meta-review: February 27th – March 10th - Notification date: March 13th Assigned Papers: - (46) A framework for Evaluating Bias in LLM-Generated Code - (62) A Universal Textual Merge Strategy Based on Tokens for Version Control Systems - (108) STLGT: A Scalable Trace-Based Linear Graph Transformer for Tail Latency Prediction in Microservices - (118) Sustainability of Open Source Machine Learning Robustness Assessment Tools: A Repository Mining Study - (184) Exploring Creativity in Human–Human-LLM Collaborative Software Design Subtasks: 1. Log in to EasyChair and access assigned submissions. (Due: Jan 27) 2. Review each assigned paper with positivity and constructiveness. 3. Use the scoring system to rate papers. 4. If lead reviewer, drive discussions, check reviews, and write meta-reviews. (Discussion phase: Feb 27 - Mar 10) 5. Submit all reviews by February 26. 6. Participate in online discussions and submit meta-review if applicable between February 27 and March 10. 7. Await notification on March 13. Please ensure to keep all reviews respectful and support your evaluations thoroughly. Contact program chairs Silvia Abrahão and Xin Xia for any questions. todoist-labels:: #ai-generated-main-task todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 🧠​​ Manage EASE 2026 Leading Reviewer Submission Review Process todoist-id:: 6frGf8cR7g3RFwMg todoist-project:: #📜 REVIEWS todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: Subject: EASE2026 submission assignment (as leading reviewers) Sender: ease2026@easychair.org Weblink: Outlook Content Summary: You are assigned as the Leading Reviewer for papers (62) and (184) in the EASE 2026 conference. Your role involves facilitating the review process by ensuring review quality, initiating and moderating discussions, and writing a meta-review with a recommendation. Subtasks: 1. Check colleagues' reviews for appropriate and constructive language. Request clarifications through EasyChair comments if issues are found. 2. Initiate the discussion starting February 27th, even if some reviews are still missing. 3. Moderate the discussion to help reach a consensus by March 10th. 4. Write a brief meta-review summarizing the discussion and giving a recommendation (accept/reject) for the Program Chairs. 5. Submit your final recommendations by March 10th, AoE. Deadline: March 10th, AoE Labels: ai-generated-main-task todoist-labels:: #ai-generated-main-task todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Deliverable D3.2 todoist-id:: 6fVRXMVJWRWQ2fgG todoist-project:: #🚀 Projects-EU-MOSAICO todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: MOSAICO D3.2 - Online LaTeX Editor Overleaf todoist-labels:: #goal #logseqed todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Richiesta di autorizzazione missione in attesa di decisione: percipiente MARTUSCIELLO FEDERICO, dal 07/05/2025 00:00, al 28/05/2025 23:59 todoist-id:: 6fvgffXCPhf89H6g todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: From: ugov@univaq.it Received: 2026-02-02T13:52:34Z ✉: Web Link --- --- U-WEB La informiamo che la richiesta di autorizzazione missione num.709780, di MARTUSCIELLO FEDERICO, a Salerno, dal 07/05/2025 00:00, al 28/05/2025 23:59, descr: Periodo di scambio presso l'Università degli Studi di Salerno borsa PNRR è todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 FATE - precedente DRAMA: Nuova Metodologia e Risultati todoist-id:: 6fW295wjFjqGj5c8 todoist-project:: #✏️ PAPERS todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: https://www.overleaf.com/project/69675da0f0967462b3bd0c9d Web Link Okay, here’s a task description for the email “R: Aggiornamento Paper DRAMA: Nuova Metodologia e Risultati,” crafted with actionable steps, aiming to help someone understand and complete the task: Task Title: Finalize & Share the DRAMA Paper Update Description: This task focuses on finalizing the updated DRAMA paper and ensuring it’s presented effectively to stakeholders. It involves reviewing the document, incorporating feedback, and preparing it for distribution. Actionable Steps: 1. Review the Document: Carefully read the entire updated DRAMA paper. Pay particular attention to the section regarding [Specifically mention the key section or data point the paper focuses on - e.g., methodology, results, conclusions]. 2. Gather Feedback: Share the document with [Assignee - specify who needs to review it - e.g., Team Lead, Senior Analyst]. Actively solicit feedback on clarity, accuracy, and completeness. 3. Address Feedback: Respond to each piece of feedback received. Document all changes made based on feedback. Prioritize revisions based on the severity of the feedback. 4. Incorporate Changes: Implement the necessary revisions to ensure the document accurately reflects the updated methodology and results. 5. Draft a Summary/Executive Summary: Create a concise executive summary highlighting the key takeaways, the updated methodology, and the most significant results (approximately [Specify length – e.g., 1-2 paragraphs]). 6. Finalize & Format: Ensure the document is properly formatted, including consistent headings, tables, figures, and citations. 7. Prepare for Distribution: Choose the appropriate distribution method (e.g., email, shared drive, presentation). Consider adding a brief introductory paragraph explaining the update. 8. Proofread: Conduct a final proofread to catch any errors before final submission. Priority: Medium - This task requires focused effort and attention to detail. Due Date: [Specify a realistic deadline – e.g., End of Day Tomorrow] Notes: If you have any specific areas you’d like me to focus on during the review, please let me know. --- To help me refine this further and make it even better, could you tell me: - Who is the intended audience for this task? (e.g., Team, Management, Clients?) - What is the specific goal of the updated paper? (e.g., present a new strategy, demonstrate improved efficiency, provide data insights?) todoist-labels:: #outlook365 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Nominare nuovo rappresentante studenti todoist-id:: 6fWVrV7q926WxpGh todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Calendario lezioni Area Comune CUFIS todoist-id:: 6fvm348cQ42QJJr8 todoist-project:: #👨‍🏫 Teaching todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: From: emanuela.botta@univaq.it Received: 2026-02-02T18:21:15Z ✉: Web Link --- --- Care e cari, finalmente sono arrivati i decreti attuativi e presto apriremo le iscrizioni, i tempi sono molto stretti perché il percorso dovrà chiudersi entro il 30 giugno 2026. Vi scrivo per quanto riguarda l’orario dell'area comune. Come lo scorso anno todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Richiesta variazione strutture estere mobilità e richiesta autorizzazioni - Giacomelli Stefano todoist-id:: 6fm4v9FRJ485fgv8 todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: From: stefano.giacomelli@graduate.univaq.it Received: 2026-01-13T21:06:18Z ✉: Web Link ✉: Web Link (Initial email) --- Task Description: Stefano Giacomelli, a PhD student in ICT, is requesting a change in his mandatory 6-month PNRR mobility program's host institution. He has secured a new host institution in Belgium (KU Leuven) and has obtained an official invitation letter. He is also providing supporting documents, including a letter detailing the reasons for the change, information on the new host institution, and his visiting proposal. Additionally, he is attaching authorization requests for the PhD program coordinator and will soon provide "commitment letters" from the new host institution. Recommended Actions: 1. Review and Process Host Institution Change Request: Evaluate the provided documentation for the change of host institution for Stefano Giacomelli's PNRR mobility. 2. Verify Supporting Documents: Ensure all attached documents (letter of motivation, host institution details, visiting proposal, invitation letters) are complete and accurate. 3. Obtain Commitment Letters: Follow up with Stefano Giacomelli to ensure timely submission of the "commitment letters" from the new host institution. 4. Approve Coordination Request: Review and approve the authorization requests for the PhD program coordinator. 5. Facilitate Ministry Notification: Transmit the approved request, including all necessary details of the new host institution, to the Ministry (MUR) via the CINECA platform as per the instructions. 6. Confirm U-Web Mission Request: Advise Stefano Giacomelli on the process for opening a mission request on the U-Web portal for his visiting period. 7. Provide Additional Guidance: Address any further questions Stefano Giacomelli may have regarding the administrative and bureaucratic procedures for his mobility. Deadline: - The email mentions that any variation to the initial project must be authorized by the Ministry and that this step is "very important and requires urgent action." While no specific date is given, this implies a need for prompt processing. --- Buonasera, Sono Stefano Giacomelli, dottorando DISIM ICT del XXXIX ciclo. A seguito delle informazioni ricevute mediante "Ticket - Help Point" dalla Dr.ssa Valeria Gentile, e in accordo con il mio Tutor (Prof. Fabio Graziosi) e il mio Supervisor (Prof. todoist-labels:: #followup todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Fwd: Decision on your submission - JSSOFTWARE-D-25-01604 todoist-id:: 6fpXr6XWhhcQWfrc todoist-project:: #📧EmailsToAnswer todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: From: disorbo@unisannio.it Received: 2026-01-20T09:03:13Z ✉: Web Link --- Here's a summary of the email content and the corresponding actionable task: Task Summary: The email is a rejection notification from the Journal of Systems and Software (JSS) for the submission "Examining Fairness Issues in Machine Learning-based Systems" (Ref. No.: JSSOFTWARE-D-25-01604). While the paper is rejected, the editor strongly advises resubmission after addressing the reviewers' detailed comments. The reviewers highlight significant areas for improvement in the manuscript's framing of fairness, integration of related work, methodological structure and detail (especially for the qualitative analysis), dataset selection justification, and the significance and implications of the results. The resubmitted paper will be treated as a new submission. Actionable Task: Task: Revise and Resubmit Paper to Journal of Systems and Software Description: The submission "Examining Fairness Issues in Machine Learning-based Systems" (Ref. No.: JSSOFTWARE-D-25-01604) has been rejected by the Journal of Systems and Software. However, the editor encourages resubmission after addressing detailed reviewer comments. Key areas for improvement include: * Framing of Fairness: Clearly define whether fairness is treated as a technical, socio-technical, or hybrid concern. * Related Work: Synthesize the literature into a coherent argument rather than an enumerative survey. * Methodology: * Present a unified methodological structure with clear workflows and transitions between phases. * Provide more detailed explanations for the qualitative coding process, including iteration, rater interaction, and reliance on LLM summaries. * Clarify the sequencing of methodological steps and ensure logical dependencies. * Justify dataset selection criteria and report exclusion numbers. * Ensure consistency between research questions and the role of LLMs. * Consider extending the dataset size if feasible through pre-screening. * Results and Discussion: * Explicitly discuss novel vs. incremental findings and align with previous empirical work. * Provide concrete examples of implications for practitioners. * Consider adding new research questions and discussions. * Clarify the rationale for using large language models. * Overall Cohesion: Improve the integration and cohesion across different methods employed in the study. Recommended Actions: 1. Thoroughly read and understand all reviewer comments. 2. Develop a detailed plan to address each comment. Categorize comments by theme (e.g., Introduction, Methodology, Results, Discussion) to facilitate systematic revision. 3. Rewrite sections of the manuscript based on the reviewer feedback, focusing on the identified weaknesses. 4. Prepare a comprehensive response letter detailing how each reviewer comment has been addressed. 5. Ensure the resubmitted manuscript is treated as a NEW submission but consider disclosing the original submission information and reference number. 6. Consult empirical research guidelines (e.g., Paul Ralph et al. 2020) for structuring the revised manuscript and methodology. 7. Consider creating a methodological diagram to clarify the workflow. No Deadline: The email does not specify a deadline for resubmission. --- Buongiorno a tutti, vi giro la mail ricevuta da JSS. Saluti, Andrea ---------- Forwarded message --------- Da: Journal of Systems and Software em@editorialmanager.com Date: lun 19 gen 2026 alle ore 10:59 Subject: Decision on your submission todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Acquisto CASA Pescara todoist-id:: 6cW7QqW6CpR2XfMF todoist-project:: #📗 Personal todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-labels:: #goal #logseqed todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Benchmarking framework todoist-id:: 6cqMhJPhw74vH3wp todoist-project:: #🚀 Projects-EU-MOSAICO todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-labels:: #deepwork #goal #logseqed todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Chiamare Lina Calandra todoist-id:: 6frjr4pqhF8PjMff todoist-project:: #👨‍🏫 Teaching todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Registrazione voto modulo Model Driven Engineering & SE for IoT todoist-id:: 6fvm343P64J5F5xg todoist-project:: #👨‍🏫 Teaching todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: From: federico.capricci@student.univaq.it Received: 2026-02-02T16:09:01Z ✉: Web Link --- Okay, here’s a summary of the email content, focusing on actionable tasks and a deadline assignment: Summary: The email requests the registration of student scores for the "Model Driven Engineering & SE for IoT" module. The recipient has the following scores: * MDE = 27 * IoT = 30 Actionable Tasks: 1. Verify and Register Scores: Immediately check and register the provided scores (MDE = 27 and IoT = 30) in the designated system. This is the primary task. 2. Deadline Consideration: Since there are specific scores, it’s important to consider the deadline for these assessments (not provided in the text, but likely a timeframe). Assign a deadline for this registration to Todoist. --- Do you want me to expand on this summary with specific steps or add a deadline assignment if you would like? --- Buongiorno, scriviamo per chiedere la registrazione del voto per il modulo Model Driven Engineering & SE for IoT. Le rispettive valutazioni per gli esami sono state: MDE = 27 IoT = 30 Grazie mille, Buona giornata. todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 nome del package: simonadibari292973. Membri del gruppo: 1.Di Bari Simona 292973, 2.Pipieri Matteo 292982, 3.Turchetta Alice 292191 todoist-id:: 6fvvVvXFxRXxMqJg todoist-project:: #👨‍🏫 Teaching todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Registrazione contratto Corsigani todoist-id:: 6fjWHCmHqGFFvMvF todoist-project:: #📗 Personal todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Aggiornare sito con gli ultimi due corsi aggiuntivi todoist-id:: 6frwc82JfjrWXH2h todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Manuscript ID SOSYM-26-00005495 is now in your Editor Center todoist-id:: 6fqqJqV6XmqFHJVg todoist-project:: #💺 EditoringChairing todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: From: onbehalfof@manuscriptcentral.com Received: 2026-01-25T14:55:25Z ✉: Web Link --- ## Task Summary: Reviewer Assignment for Manuscript SOSYM-26-00005495 A manuscript titled "Integrating Pretrained Large Language Models and Graph Neural Networks For Model-Driven Engineering: A Graph Language Modeling Framework" (ID SOSYM-26-00005495) has been submitted to the journal Software and Systems Modeling. Professor Davide Di Ruscio is requested to assign reviewers for this manuscript. ## Actionable Task for Professor Davide Di Ruscio: Task Title: Assign Reviewers for Manuscript SOSYM-26-00005495 Description: Assign appropriate reviewers for the submitted manuscript SOSYM-26-00005495. Key Actions: 1. Login: Access the journal's editorial system at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/sosym using your credentials (User ID: davide.diruscio@univaq.it). 2. Navigate: Go to your "Editor Center". 3. Locate Manuscript: Click on "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" and then click "Take Action" for manuscript SOSYM-26-00005495. 4. Search & Select Reviewers: Utilize the quick or advanced search fields to find suitable reviewers. Select reviewers using the checkboxes and click "Add". 5. Create New Reviewers (Optional): If necessary, create new reviewer accounts, ensuring no duplicates. 6. Invite Reviewers: Press the "Invite" button in the "Reviewer List". 7. Edit & Send Invitation: Edit the invitation message as desired and then press "Save and Send". 8. Monitor Review Quality: Be vigilant about the quality of reviews provided, considering the potential misuse of Generative AI. 9. Consult Guidelines: Refer to the Editor guidelines at http://www.sosym.org/editor_guidelines/ for additional information. Deadline: As soon as possible. --- 25-Jan-2026 Dear Professor Davide Di Ruscio: Manuscript ID SOSYM-26-00005495 entitled "Integrating Pretrained Large Language Models and Graph Neural Networks For Model-Driven Engineering: A Graph Language Modeling Framework," with Professor Bork as todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Invitation to Review for the Software and Systems Modeling todoist-id:: 6fvwMF3RgM7CjMF8 todoist-project:: #📜 REVIEWS todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: From: onbehalfof@manuscriptcentral.com Received: 2026-02-03T14:52:44Z ✉: Web Link --- Okay, here's a summary of the email, formatted as a task list with actionable steps, aiming for conciseness and clarity: Task Summary: Review Manuscript – "Finding Strongly Connected Components in Large Object-Oriented Models with Repetitive Structures" Goal: Review the manuscript and provide feedback to Davide. Actionable Steps: 1. Link Check: Verify that the link provided in the email (https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/sosym?URL_MASK=3bcbb195a1cf47a4acb32acdf9f1dd64) is functional. If not, follow the instructions within the email to accept/decline. 2. Review & Provide Feedback: Carefully read the manuscript, focusing on the abstract and the algorithm's description. 3. Confirm Review: Reply to Davide via email with your review and any relevant observations/comments. 4. Submit Review (If Approved): Once Davide approves your review, follow the instructions outlined in the email to access Manuscript Central and begin the review process. 5. Note: AI Consideration: Consider the note about AI-assisted review regarding privacy, confidentiality, and intellectual property. Ensure your review remains authentic and reflects your professional judgment. Deadline: 05-Mar-2026 (Suggested) Todoist Task: Create a task in Todoist to track the review process and ensure all necessary steps are completed. --- 03-Feb-2026 Dear Davide: I think this paper is a bit tough to assign but it conntects a bit of your work albeit (I believe). would you be able to review it? Manuscript ID SOSYM-26-00005506 entitled "Finding Strongly Connected Components in Large todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Lettere di incarico Dottorandi PRIN 2022 todoist-id:: 6fvwpCxX9j9X3Hxg todoist-project:: #Inbox todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: From: disim.sac@strutture.univaq.it Received: 2026-02-03T08:25:59Z ✉: Web Link --- Okay, here’s a summary of the email content, broken down into actionable tasks, with a focus on clarity and conciseness: Task Summary: Draft a letter of instruction for the Dottorandi to prepare letter of intent for the next year's project. Actionable Tasks: 1. Identify the specific requirements outlined in the email. (This is the core task - understand exactly what's required.) 2. Draft the letter of instruction. (Create the actual text of the letter.) 3. Review and finalize the letter of instruction. (Ensure accuracy, clarity, and compliance with the email's guidelines.) 4. Send the letter of instruction to the Dottorandi. (Deliver the instruction to the assigned group.) 5. Confirm the recipients of the letter. (Ensure the correct recipients receive the document) Deadline (Assumed): This is not explicitly stated, but it implies a timeframe for completing the task - likely within the next week or two. Todoist Task: Create a task in Todoist titled "Dottorandi Letter of Intent". --- Buongiorno, vi scrivo per segnalarvi che le lettere di incarico dovranno essere predisposte anche per i dottorandi che, seppur a costo zero, hanno sostenuto missioni pagate dal progetto. Nelle linee guida è infatti specificato: "I costi sostenuti per todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Riprendere l alimentatore comprato Comet todoist-id:: 6fvwqvpX524XvrWg todoist-project:: #Inbox todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Chiamare Andreina per appuntamento papa' todoist-id:: 6fw273x4G2MhhCr8 todoist-project:: #Inbox todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Chiamare urologo per papa' todoist-id:: 6fw27HPhh4qjvvGg todoist-project:: #Inbox todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Rivedere Composizione Collegio todoist-id:: 6X4Jp7W4VW84FHqh todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-labels:: #goal todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 [mosaico-all] MOSAICO CM3 todoist-id:: 6f67vMc5RgHcgVR8 todoist-project:: #✈ Missioni todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: From: zhanna.zhussupova@imt-atlantique.fr Received: 2025-10-16T14:25:53Z ✉: Web Link --- Dear all, We are pleased to confirm that the MOSAICO CM3 will be kindly hosted by Netcompany-Intrasoft at its Athens headquarters, located at 13 Fragkokklisias Street, Maroussi, Greece. Please find attached the directions to the venue and the list of todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 I: PRIN 2022 e PRIN 2022 PNRR - FAQ VIII elenco todoist-id:: 6fpqJRPHvj4MCXQg todoist-project:: #🚀 Projects-PRIN2022-FRINGE todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: From: disim.sac@strutture.univaq.it Received: 2026-01-21T09:40:01Z ✉: Web Link --- This email is a notification regarding the final reporting for PRIN 2022 and PRIN 2022 PNRR projects. Key information: * Expenses for "Acquisti e/o personale a costo reale" (Purchases and/or real-cost personnel) paid in February 2025 will not be eligible for the final report. * The email also forwards the latest FAQs from the Ministry for final reporting. Task Recommendation: Task: Review PRIN 2022 and PRIN 2022 PNRR project expenses and ensure compliance with reporting guidelines. Actions: 1. Review expenditure records: Carefully examine all project expenses, particularly those related to "Acquisti e/o personale a costo reale." 2. Identify ineligible expenses: Flag any expenses paid in February 2025 for purchases or real-cost personnel. 3. Consult FAQs: Read the provided Ministry FAQs for PRIN 2022 and PRIN 2022 PNRR to ensure a thorough understanding of all reporting requirements. 4. Adjust financial reporting: Make necessary adjustments to the financial reports to exclude any ineligible expenses identified. 5. Communicate with project teams: Inform relevant project teams about the exclusion criteria and ensure they are aware of the reporting deadlines and requirements. Deadline: N/A (No explicit deadline mentioned for this specific action, but it's crucial for the overall project reporting which will have deadlines). --- Buongiorno, vi invio per opportuna conoscenza l'ultima nota dell'ufficio PRIN per quanto riguarda la chiusura delle rendicontazione dei progetti PRIN 2022 e PRIN 2022 PNRR. Nello specifico vi segnalo che non saranno ammissibili alla rendicontazione fi todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 fra le università straniere va aggiunta la Aalborg University che ha ospitato Roberta di Fonzo e con cui abbiamo alcune pubblicazioni, anche su IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics e on Industry Applications il dottorando Noman Liaqat andrà pres... todoist-id:: 6fG9FrXwcrvMxhp8 todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: Web Link todoist-labels:: #outlook365 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 SW-2025-10-0161.R1 Review Submitted - Di Sipio todoist-id:: 6frwVhMF3mGmJfCg todoist-project:: #💺 EditoringChairing todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: From: onbehalfof@manuscriptcentral.com Received: 2026-01-30T08:52:23Z ✉: Web Link --- Okay, here’s a concise summary of the email, suitable for a Todoist task: Task: Respond to Davide Di Sipio's review of the "Explainer Pattern" manuscript. Summary: Thank Davide for his feedback and provide access to the scoresheet (via IEEE Software ScholarOne Manuscripts). Actionable Steps: 1. Access Scoresheet: Go to the IEEE Software ScholarOne Manuscripts website: https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/sw-cs 2. Review Feedback: Read Davide’s review of the manuscript. 3. Acknowledge Feedback: Respond to Davide with a thank you and acknowledge the key points raised. --- SW-2025-10-0161.R1, "Explainer Pattern – A Design Pattern for the Integration of Explanations in Code" Manuscript Type: Regular 30-Jan-2026 Dear Davide, Mr. Claudio Di Sipio just submitted a review for the above referenced manuscript. We would l todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Preparare viaggio todoist-id:: 6fvr8XmxRcXH98rV todoist-project:: #👷 WORK todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Buongiorno Prof. Dovrei aver concluso il progetto con lo sviluppo dei 4 punti che ci siamo detti sopra durante l'esame. Spiego di seguito: un container per ogni componente: Ogni componente logico (Monitor, Analyzer, Planner, Executor, Knowledge Base) è eseguito in un container Docker dedicato e isolato, garantendo modularità, ognuno con le sue dipendenze. estensibilità rispetto a sensori vs attuatori: ho superato la logica hardcoded come ci eravamo detti in riferimento alla slide 06_Slides-Control-Systems-v2.pdf implementando una gestione basata su Control Loops configurabili. Il sistema ora non conosce a priori le regole, ma istanzia dinamicamente i loop (es. Hydration Loop, Safety Loop) leggendoli dalla configurazione. Questo garantisce la totale estensibilità rispetto a nuovi sensori o nuove regole di adattamento senza ricompilare il codice. configurazione con un container dedicato: ho implementato un container dedicato (config-server) che agisce come Single Source of Truth, iniettando le policy di adattamento e la topologia a runtime. documentazione: È allegato il report PDF strutturato secondo il template fornito, completo di tassonomia dell'adattamento, logica formale e validazione visiva degli scenari tramite Dashboard Grafana.Ho inserito tutto nel repo https://github.com/ocraton/smart-olive-grove todoist-id:: 6fr34W536H4grP9g todoist-project:: #👨‍🏫 Teaching todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Hi Professor, I just wanted to let you know that we have updated everything based on your feedback for the IoT project. The following major changes are now implemented:- The threshold values used for Telegram notifications are now fully dynamic (loaded from the config).- The Grafana dashboards update automatically whenever a new sensor or threshold is added. - All sensor units are now loaded dynamically from the config file.- The main configuration file has been moved to its own config directory. todoist-id:: 6fqFgJPRQHf9hcGg todoist-project:: #👨‍🏫 Teaching todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Buongiorno Prof. Dovrei aver concluso il progetto con lo sviluppo dei 4 punti che ci siamo detti sopra durante l'esame. Spiego di seguito: un container per ogni componente: Ogni componente logico (Monitor, Analyzer, Planner, Executor, Knowledge Base) è eseguito in un container Docker dedicato e isolato, garantendo modularità, ognuno con le sue dipendenze. estensibilità rispetto a sensori vs attuatori: ho superato la logica hardcoded come ci eravamo detti in riferimento alla slide 06_Slides-Control-Systems-v2.pdf implementando una gestione basata su Control Loops configurabili. Il sistema ora non conosce a priori le regole, ma istanzia dinamicamente i loop (es. Hydration Loop, Safety Loop) leggendoli dalla configurazione. Questo garantisce la totale estensibilità rispetto a nuovi sensori o nuove regole di adattamento senza ricompilare il codice. configurazione con un container dedicato: ho implementato un container dedicato (config-server) che agisce come Single Source of Truth, iniettando le policy di adattamento e la topologia a runtime. documentazione: È allegato il report PDF strutturato secondo il template fornito, completo di tassonomia dell'adattamento, logica formale e validazione visiva degli scenari tramite Dashboard Grafana.Ho inserito tutto nel repo https://github.com/ocraton/smart-olive-grove todoist-id:: 6frVX6QM6Jp4jRw8 todoist-project:: #👨‍🏫 Teaching todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 SE4IOT Final Project Update - Team 7 todoist-id:: 6frhPXP6xcPW7gF8 todoist-project:: #👨‍🏫 Teaching todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: From: meteharun.akcay@student.univaq.it Received: 2026-01-29T10:13:50Z ✉: Web Link --- Okay, here's a summary of the email content, followed by actionable task recommendations: Summary of Email Content: The email is a follow-up to a feedback discussion regarding a Smarthouse project. It details the following: * Implemented Updates: The code has been updated and is available in the GitHub repository at https://github.com/phuc-tr/smarthouse. * Changes Summarized: * Room profiles are now configurable within the simulator/config.yaml. * A .env file has been added for the required environment variables. * Altering the alerting logic is now possible without Node-RED changes. * Request for Review: The author requests review and feedback on the updated code. * Actionable Task Recommendation: The author suggests reviewing the changes and notifying them about any further adjustments needed. Actionable Task Recommendations (Todoist Task Creation): 1. Create a Task: "Review Smarthouse Project Updates - GitHub" 2. Assign Priority: High (As this is a follow-up and requires verification) 3. Due Date: Ideally, within 24-48 hours (to allow for review and testing) 4. Include Details: Add: “Investigate the .env file configuration. Confirm the environment variable loading mechanism is working as expected." 5. Consider: "Check if any further configuration changes are needed in the YAML configuration files." Let me know if you'd like me to refine this further! --- Dear Professor, Following your feedback on our Smarthouse project, we implemented the requested improvements. The updated version is now available in our GitHub repository: GitHub - phuc-tr/smarthouse The changes are summarized below: * todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Final version of the Autonomous Systems project todoist-id:: 6fv73MCMFv963736 todoist-project:: #👨‍🏫 Teaching todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: From: alejandro.munozmorillo@student.univaq.it Received: 2026-01-30T16:07:42Z ✉: Web Link --- Okay, here's a summary of the email, focusing on actionable tasks, and including a deadline (as assigned to Todoist): Summary: The email is a follow-up to a course project, specifically regarding architectural changes. The author, Alejandro Muñoz Morillo, has implemented modularity and containerization (Docker/Docker Compose) to improve the system's architecture. They've attached the final project version and GitHub link for review. The key action recommended is to thoroughly review the project and ensure coherence between implementation and documentation. Actionable Tasks: 1. Review the Project: Carefully examine the finalized project version for accuracy and alignment with the original objectives and guidelines. 2. GitHub Link Verification: Confirm the GitHub link is accurate and leads to the correct repository. 3. Update Todoist Task: Assign this task to Todoist to ensure timely completion. (Deadline: Today) Let me know if you'd like me to refine this summary further! --- Dear Professor, I hope you are doing well. We are writing to inform you that we have implemented the changes and improvements you suggested for our project in the course Software Engineering for Autonomous Systems. In particular, we have focused on impr todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Comunicazione Registri delle lezioni I semestre a.a.2025-2026 todoist-id:: 6frwVhQVmF246hM8 todoist-project:: #👨‍🏫 Teaching todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: From: disim.uprodid@strutture.univaq.it Received: 2026-01-30T09:02:07Z ✉: Web Link --- --- Gentilissime e gentilissimi, buongiorno. È nostra prassi ricordarvi la necessità di procedere alla compilazione dei registri delle lezioni relativi al II semestre a.a.2025-2026, alla verifica dei dati e, infine, al loro invio. In caso di eventuali probl todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 [Dottorato PNRR] Relazione annuale di sintesi todoist-id:: 6fj3mhqW972xv5c8 todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: From: alessandra.galassi@graduate.univaq.it Received: 2026-01-09T11:04:30Z ✉: Web Link --- Okay, here’s a synthesized summary of the email, broken down into actionable tasks, based on the content: Task Summary: The email is a formal message from a "Chiar.mo Coordinatore del corso dottorale in ICT prof. Di Ruscio" (Coordination Officer for the PhD in ICT Professor Di Ruscio) to the recipient. The recipient is being sent a completed and signed form outlining a course. Actionable Tasks: 1. Review and Confirm Completeness: Carefully read the completed and signed form to ensure all required information is accurately present. 2. Attach the Form: Attach the completed form to this email. 3. Send the Form: Send the attached form to the recipient. 4. Express Good Wishes: Compose a polite and cordial message to the recipient, wishing them a happy New Year. 5. Verify Sender Information: Ensure the email is sent from a valid and trusted source. Let me know if you'd like me to elaborate on any of these points or add more detail! --- Chiar.mo Coordinatore del corso dottorale in ICT prof. Di Ruscio, come da guida utente, in allegato, invio compilata e firmata quanto specificato in oggetto. Grazie. L’occasione è gradita per porgere i migliori auguri di buon anno! Un saluto cordiale, todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Proposta per Univaq On Air - Dottorandi di Ricerca todoist-id:: 6fmfWgpGcX7V285g todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: Weblink: Outlook Email Content Summary: Proposal for the Univaq podcast to feature a series of interventions by research PhD students across various scientific areas and schools. The initiative aligns with the goal to narrate the life of an important and dynamic academic community. Seeking opinion and coordination for necessary steps from the coordinator of the podcast. No specific deadlines mentioned. todoist-labels:: #ai-generated #ai-generated-main-task todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 ECMFA 2026 submission assignment todoist-id:: 6ffWC97GGvHG4qG8 todoist-project:: #📜 REVIEWS todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: Web Link Okay, here’s a task description based on the email content "ECMFA 2026 submission assignment," designed to be actionable and clearly outlined: Task Title: Complete ECMFA 2026 Submission – [Specify Document Name/Format - e.g., Final Report, Presentation, etc.] Description: This task requires you to finalize and submit the ECMFA 2026 submission, specifically [State the specific document/deliverable - e.g., the final report, the presentation slides, the data analysis]. This is a crucial step in ensuring the successful completion of the ECMFA 2026 project. Actionable Steps: 1. Review Submission Guidelines: Thoroughly review the official ECMFA 2026 submission guidelines document located at [Insert Link to Document Here – VERY IMPORTANT]. Pay close attention to formatting requirements, data sources, and required elements. 2. Gather Required Data: Collect all necessary data and information as outlined in the guidelines. This may involve [List specific data sources - e.g., accessing the database, reviewing reports, performing specific calculations]. 3. Format and Organize Content: Organize your submission content in a clear, logical, and consistent format. Ensure all sections are properly labeled and aligned. 4. Proofread and Edit: Carefully proofread your entire submission for any grammatical errors, typos, or inconsistencies. Check formatting for consistency. 5. Submit the Submission: Submit the completed document through [Specify Submission Method - e.g., Outlook, SharePoint, designated portal]. 6. [Optional - If applicable] - Submit Feedback: If you have any questions or require clarification on any part of the submission, please send a brief email to [Your Email Address] within 24 hours of submitting. Deadline: [Insert Deadline – Be realistic!] Priority: [High/Medium/Low - Assign a priority level.] Assigned To: [Your Name/Team Name] Notes: If you encounter any roadblocks or require assistance, please don’t hesitate to reach out to [Contact Person/Team for Support - e.g., your supervisor, the ECMFA team]. --- To help me refine this further and make it even more tailored, could you tell me: * What kind of document is this submission for? (Report, presentation, data analysis, etc.?) * Are there any specific guidelines or requirements you want to highlight? (e.g., specific data sources, format requirements, length restrictions?) todoist-labels:: #outlook365 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Manuscript in your Reviewer Center - IEEE Software, SWSI-2026-01-0024 todoist-id:: 6fjh74qpCPV5HJ38 todoist-project:: #📜 REVIEWS todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: From: onbehalfof@manuscriptcentral.com Received: 2026-01-12T07:28:14Z ✉: Web Link --- Okay, here’s a synthesis of the email content, transforming it into actionable tasks for completing the task of reviewing the manuscript. I’ve focused on clarity and providing specific steps. Task Summary: Review the IEEE Software manuscript ("SWSI-2026-01-0024") for adherence to peer review guidelines, focusing on confidentiality and providing substantive feedback. Actionable Tasks & Breakdown: 1. Review Policies Understanding (Priority: High): * Action: Thoroughly read the reviewer policies document (link: [https://magazines.ieeeauthorcenter.ieee.org/submit-your-article-for-peer-review/about-the-peer-review-process]) to understand the specific requirements for content, format, and communication. Pay close attention to the emphasis on confidentiality regarding AI-generated feedback. * Deliverable: A concise summary of key policy points – particularly concerning what constitutes acceptable or unacceptable review comments. 2. Manuscript Review & Initial Assessment (Priority: High): * Action: Begin reviewing the manuscript – specifically focusing on the sections related to the agentic system engineering context. Identify key sections: * Abstract: Ensure it accurately summarizes the manuscript's purpose and scope. * Introduction: Evaluate the relevance of the context engineering concept to the manuscript’s topic. * Methodology: Assess the methods used – are they appropriate for the context? * Results & Discussion: Confirm the results are logically supported by the methods. * Conclusion: Assess the final conclusion – is it justified and well-supported? * Deliverable: A brief (1-2 paragraph) summary of initial impressions, highlighting potential areas of concern (e.g., a lack of specific details, unclear methodology). 3. Identify Key Concerns - Confidentiality & AI Feedback (Priority: Medium): * Action: Specifically look for the sections where the reviewer emphasizes caution regarding sharing information about the manuscript with AI platforms for text generation. * Deliverable: A list of 2-3 specific concerns regarding the manuscript's use of AI-generated content, which you will need to address in your review. 4. Content Review & Feedback (Priority: High): * Action: Address the following points based on your concerns: * Referencing: Ensure all citations are accurate and properly formatted. * Specificity: Ensure claims are supported by evidence. * Context: Clarify the agentic system engineering context. Does it adequately demonstrate its significance? * AI Integration: Carefully assess the role and influence of AI. Does it feel like a supplementary tool or integral to the core work? (The reviewer’s concern about shared information is key here.) * Deliverable: Draft review comments addressing each identified concern, focusing on providing specific, constructive feedback. (Focus on the why behind your comments – not just stating the problem.) 5. Review Score Sheet & Submission (Priority: Medium): * Action: Carefully and accurately fill out the review score sheet, ensuring all sections are completed (Confidential Comments, Public Comments, and any other required fields). * Deliverable: Completed review score sheet, with all required fields filled. 6. Communication Protocol (Priority: Medium): * Action: Respond promptly to any questions from the editor or reviewer. Be professional and courteous. * Deliverable: A record of your communication attempts – noting the date, content, and outcome of each communication. 7. Final Review & Submission (Priority: Low): Once you've completed all steps, submit the manuscript for review. Important Note: Document everything – your reasoning behind the feedback, specific examples, and any changes made during the review process. This will provide a clear audit trail for future review decisions. --- Let me know if you'd like me to elaborate on any of these tasks or provide more specific examples! --- IEEE Software, SWSI-2026-01-0024 manuscript type: SWSI: Agentic System Engineering (Sep/Oct 2026) "Context Engineering for Software Engineering Agents" 12-Jan-2026 Dear Prof. Di Ruscio: Thank you for agreeing to review the above reference manus todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Re: FW: FW: Un breve corso su Quantum Computing todoist-id:: 6frj3mGxqcGgmqvg todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: Web Link Okay, based solely on the subject line "Re: FW: FW: Un breve corso su Quantum Computing" (A brief course on Quantum Computing), it's highly probable that someone forwarded information about a quantum computing course, and the current email is a response or a directive related to that information. Here's an actionable task description, assuming the most common scenario: the sender wants the recipient to investigate this course further for potential team training or personal development. --- ## Task: Evaluate Quantum Computing Course for Team Training Description: Following up on the forwarded email chain "Un breve corso su Quantum Computing," the goal is to assess the suitability of this brief quantum computing course as a potential training opportunity for the team or relevant individuals. This involves gathering key details, evaluating its content, and determining feasibility. Source Email: * Subject: Re: FW: FW: Un breve corso su Quantum Computing * Likely Sender: [Person who sent the email to you] * Likely Context: The sender has seen information about a quantum computing course and is prompting further investigation. Priority: Medium Due Date: [Suggest a date, e.g., End of next week, 2023-11-24] Assigned To: [Your Name/Recipient of the email] Actions to Accomplish: 1. Locate Original Course Information: * Find the initial email in the thread that contains the details, link, or attachment for "Un breve corso su Quantum Computing." * If the link/information isn't immediately obvious, try searching your inbox for earlier "FW: Un breve corso su Quantum Computing" emails or ask the sender for clarification. 2. Gather Key Course Details: * Curriculum/Topics: What specific quantum computing concepts are covered? * Duration: How long is the course (hours, days, weeks)? * Format: Is it online, in-person, self-paced, live lectures? * Prerequisites: What prior knowledge (e.g., math, programming) is required? * Cost: What is the registration fee? Are there group discounts or organizational rates? * Language: Is the course entirely in Italian, or are there English options/materials? * Instructor(s): Who is teaching it, and what are their qualifications? * Dates/Schedule: When does the course run or when is registration open? 3. Evaluate Suitability for Team/Individuals: * Relevance: Does the course content align with current team projects, future goals, or skill gaps? * Audience: Who on the team would benefit most from this course? (e.g., developers, researchers, project managers). * Level: Is it an introductory, intermediate, or advanced course, and does it match the team's current knowledge level? 4. Assess Logistics & Feasibility: * Time Commitment: Can team members realistically dedicate the necessary time? * Budget: Is the cost within current training budgets? * Availability: Does the course schedule conflict with critical project deadlines or other commitments? 5. Prepare a Summary & Recommendation: * Compile the key findings from steps 2-4 into a concise summary. * Include a recommendation on whether to pursue this course (e.g., recommend for specific individuals, recommend for the whole team, recommend against it, suggest alternatives). * Highlight potential benefits and any significant challenges (cost, time, prerequisites). Expected Outcome: A brief report or email containing the essential details of the quantum computing course, an assessment of its suitability, and a clear recommendation for next steps. todoist-labels:: #outlook365 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Generale Provo a riassumere quanto ricevuto finora. Vi prego di rispondere alle richieste facendo replya questo post AREA FISICA - OLTRE LE SENSAZIONI: scoprire come ciò che percepiamo non coincide necessariamente con ciò che è misurabile, e come sensori, dati e modelli permettano di misurare, interpretare e raccontare la realtà fisica, trasformando osservazioni quotidiane in esperimenti scientifici. Francesco Salamida Possiamo modificare leggermente il titolo per collegarlo meglio con l'area Fisica ("oltre le sensazioni" resta un po' vago)AREA INFORMATICA - PENDING Claudio Arbib e/o Davide Di Ruscio dovreste comunicare il temaAREA INGEGNERIA DELL'INFORMAZIONE - COSTRUIRE IL MULTIMEDIA: scoprire come audio, immagini e video vengono acquisiti ed elaborati attraverso tecniche di trattamento dei segnali, alla base di applicazioni come podcast, fotografie digitali e videogiochi. OKAREA INGEGNERIA INDUSTRIALE - Dal Concept al Prodotto: Come Dare Forma all’Innovazione Valentina Innocenzi potete "rimpolpare" un po' a descrizione con un maggior livello di dettaglio collegando anche in modo esplciito con l'area ing. ind. o sue tematiche (per uniformità con gli altri domini applicativi)?AREA MATEMATICA - Matematica perfetta per dati "imperfetti": i dati di un problema reale possono essere imprecisi e incompleti. Usare la matematica per trovare la miglior soluzione possibile con i metodi dei minimi quadrati, con applicazioni alla localizzazione dei GPS e alla pulizia del rumore di un audio. Carmela Scalone riesci a riassumere la descrizione in un'unica frase (per uniformità con gli altri domini applicativi)? todoist-id:: 9981784047 todoist-project:: #Inbox todoist-completed:: 2026-02-04 todoist-status:: ✅
• 2026-02-04 Mandare carta d'identità al notaio todoist-id:: 9975609952 todoist-project:: #Inbox todoist-completed:: 2026-02-04 todoist-status:: ✅