2.1 KiB
2.1 KiB
full-title:: A model-driven environment for engineering multi-layered IoT systems type:: JournalPaper external-links:: COLA reviews CHESSIoT - Google Docs A model-driven environment for engineering multi-layered IoT systems - Online LaTeX Editor Overleaf todoist:: https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6517834583 year:: 2023 priority:: P4 status:: ACCEPTED venue:: COLA leader:: people/felicien progress:: {{renderer :todomaster}} date-submitted:: 22-05-2023
- ## TODOs
- [[09-05-2023]]
- DONE Rivedere sezione 3
date-submitted:: [[09-05-2023]]
- [[16-05-2023]]
- DONE Rivedere sez 4
collapsed:: true
- [[#green]]==4.1==
- [[#green]]==4.2==
- [[#green]]==4.3==
- [[#green]]==4.4==
- [[17-05-2023]]
- DONE Rivedere Sez 5
- [[#green]]==5.1==
- [[#green]]==5.[[2]]==
- [[#green]]==5.3==
- DONE Rivedere sez 6 discussion
- DONE Rivedere sez 7 conclusion
- DONE Rileggere [[paper]]
-
- ## Writing [[Notes]]
- Hi @Felicien
I'm revising the [[JOURNAL]] [[paper]]
I revised until section [[2]] included
Now I think before the evaluation section
it is necessary to show what are the challenges of the existing techniques and thus the motivation of the proposed approach
in this respect I would move current section 5
after section [[2]]
of course I would present that section as an analysis section
with the aim of analyzing the existing techniques according to the features that you have already considered in the comparative tables
at the end of this section it will be clear why ChessIOT is needed
Section 5 is not a proper evaluation
so I would not [[CALL]] evalution
it is an analysis of existing techniques
- Clarify how you identified and selected the approaches that you consider in the overview given in section 2
- The new section 3 should show the comparison of the approaches previously presented and make strong the needs for the features that are implemented by ChessIoT and shown later in the paper