logseq/pages/todoist___2026-01-16.md

• 2026-01-16 🔁Leggere un libro al mese todoist-id:: 662FJHmJ5JGQvP7p todoist-project:: #🔥 CV Empower todoist-due:: 2026-01-16 todoist-labels:: #routine todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-01-16 TOSEM-2025-1288 - Reviewer agreed todoist-id:: 6fhqXj3C4Hm4fjR8 todoist-project:: #📜 REVIEWS todoist-due:: 2026-01-16 todoist-desc:: From: onbehalfof@manuscriptcentral.com Received: 2026-01-08T15:15:16Z ✉: Web Link --- Okay, here's a summary of the email, formatted as a task description with actionable steps: Task: Review Manuscript - 'Evaluating Incompatible Third-party Library API Usage in LLM-based Code Completion' Objective: To thoroughly review the provided manuscript titled "Evaluating Incompatible Third-party Library API Usage in LLM-based Code Completion" submitted to Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology. Instructions: 1. Locate Manuscript: Access the manuscript at: * ScholarOne Manuscripts * Alternatively, access the manuscript through the system at: [http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tosem (in the reviewer center)] 2. System Login & Paper Download: Follow the instructions to log in to the system and download the manuscript. 3. Review and Identify Missing Literature: * Identify any relevant literature that is missing from the reference list. * For each relevant paper: * Collect the names of all authors. * Retrieve the paper title. * Retrieve the journal/book title where the paper was published. * Find the year of publication. * Obtain the URL link to the paper. * Justify why this source is relevant – highlight a key aspect or contribution. 4. Report Generation: Create a report summarizing your findings, including the bibliographic information of the relevant literature. 5. Report Formatting: Use the provided template for report formatting. Deliverable: A completed report containing the collected bibliographic information and justification for the identified literature. Notes: The primary focus is on verifying the accuracy and completeness of the manuscript's bibliographic information and identifying potential missing sources of literature. Ensure the report highlights key findings and is well-organized. --- 08-Jan-2026 Dear Dr. Di Ruscio, Thank you for agreeing to review the following paper submitted for possible publication to Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology: Evaluating Incompatible Third-party Library API Usage in LLM-based Co todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-01-16 Acquistare trasformatore todoist-id:: 6fWf6CF6R77g64wg todoist-project:: #📗 Personal todoist-due:: 2026-01-16 todoist-desc:: RemaTarlazzi S.p.A. · Via Nuova, 7/a, 67051 Avezzano AQ, Italy Telefono 0863455041 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-01-16 GSSI Committee Documents – Draft Minutes and Regulation todoist-id:: 6fVFH9Gfqgfh6cj8 todoist-project:: #👷 WORK todoist-due:: 2026-01-16 todoist-desc:: Web Link Task Title: Review and Organize GSSI Committee Documents Task Description: Review and organize the draft minutes and regulations of the GSSI Committee to ensure accuracy, completeness, and ease of access. The task involves the following actions: 1. Download and open the email attachment containing the draft minutes and regulations. 2. Review the documents to verify their accuracy and completeness. Identify any discrepancies or inconsistencies and make necessary corrections. 3. Organize the documents in a logical and accessible manner, such as creating folders or tags for each document type (e.g., minutes, regulations, etc.). 4. Save the organized documents in a central location, such as a shared drive or cloud storage, to ensure easy accessibility for all committee members. 5. Notify the committee members of the availability of the organized documents and provide instructions on how to access them. 6. Maintain the documents and ensure they are up-to-date and current. Actionable Steps: 1. Download and open the email attachment containing the draft minutes and regulations. 2. Review the documents for accuracy and completeness. 3. Organize the documents in a logical and accessible manner. 4. Save the organized documents in a central location. 5. Notify committee members of the availability of the organized documents. 6. Maintain the documents and ensure they are up-to-date and current. todoist-labels:: #outlook365 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-01-16 Re: Seduta Senato Accademico - 25 novembre 2025 todoist-id:: 6fWQGqhWfCMRvqV8 todoist-project:: #👷 WORK todoist-due:: 2026-01-16 todoist-desc:: Web Link Okay, here's a task description created based on the provided email content, designed for actionable completion: Task Title: Schedule and Prepare for 25 November 2025 Senate Sedat Education Confer ence Task Description: This email requests the scheduling and preliminary preparation for a Senate Education Conference scheduled for November 25th, 2025. As the lead organizer, your primary responsibility is to secure the space, confirm logistics, and ensure a productive experience for participating senators. Suggested Action Items & Deliverables: * Confirm Attendance & Confirm Seats: Verify with the Senator involved and confirm the number of attendees for the conference. Confirm that seats are pre-allocated for the necessary number of senators. * Venue Space: Contact the university/location providing the venue space and ascertain the room capacity, accessibility features, and available resources needed. Determine the best date and time for the conference, considering student schedules. * Abstract/Presentation Material Review: Quickly review the submitted abstract(s) or presentation materials to ensure they are presented professionally and are prepared in a standard format. This is crucial for a smooth and professional experience. * Virtual/Hybrid Logistics: Determine if the conference will be held virtually or in-person. If virtual, initiate preparation for platform setting (Zoom/Teams/Similar), ensuring a strong Wi-Fi and technical support option. For in-person, create a detailed logistics schedule - guest list, registration, parking information. * Budget Considerations (Initial Stage): Begin preliminary estimation for potential costs related to venue rental/facilities, catering (lunch/dinner), equipment (projectors/whiteboards), digital platform fees (if applicable). A rough budget should be created ASAP. Next Steps: Please provide a status update by Friday. Let me know if you need any further information/support. --- To help me refine this further (if needed), could you tell me: * What is the overall goal of this conference? Is it about showcasing new research, policy discussions, or something else? * Do you have any existing meeting schedules or logistical concerns within the email context? todoist-labels:: #outlook365 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-01-16 Re: About a possible EULiST application for a stay of our PhD student Zakaria Hachm in 2026 at UAQ-DISIM-SWEN Group todoist-id:: 6fWMgWwmjj3QF6Xg todoist-project:: #👷 WORK todoist-due:: 2026-01-16 todoist-desc:: Web Link Okay, here's a detailed description of the task created from the email, formatted as I would present it as an agent summarizing a task creation request. This description includes actionable items: ## Task Description: UQAM-SHM Zakharia Hachm EULiST Application Confirmation - 2026 Subject: Final Review and Action Item – EULiСТ Application for PhD Student Zakharia Hachm Purpose: Formal confirmation and necessary actions for the UQAM-SHM (Staff Headmaster’s Management, potentially referencing a student’s PhD program) to move ahead with the potential EULiSt application for Zakaria Hachm in the year 2026, with a focus on collaboration within the SWEN Group (likely signifying a strategic partnership or shared goal). Context: This task was created from an email discussing the possibility of developing an EULiSt application. A crucial step requires a final sign-off from UQAM, the managing entity, on the project’s trajectory and commitment. Actionable Tasks: 1. Client Contact & Schedule Meeting: Immediately contact the UQAM Headmaster/relevant stakeholders (specifically, the SHM team) to request a meeting to discuss the EULiСТ project in greater detail. Aim for a brief, focused initial meeting to gauge their current position on the application and ensure alignment. * Estimated Duration: 30-60 minutes * Priority: Critical - Deadline is pending further discussion with stakeholders to ensure a coordinated approach. 2. Internal Review & Data Audit (Mandatory): * Gather relevant project documents: including preliminary scope documents, budget outlines, timeline proposals, and existing partnership agreements related to the SWEN Group. * Review existing internal policies surrounding student EULiSt projects and any guidelines regarding collaboration with international partners. * Documentation Required: Document review and potential clarification is required from internal teams to ensure adherence to all applicable regulations. 3. Status Confirmation/Quasi-Approval – Urgent Action Requested: Contact the UQAM team to formally confirm whether a ‘quasi-approval’ is needed at this stage before moving into significant documentation and preparation. This confirms the project’s timeline can be executed safely by the UQAM stakeholders. Timeline: (Provide an estimated timeframe for completion – estimate 1-2 weeks) - Consider a timeline of the following: 1.1 Initial Meeting; 1.2 Content Review/Data Retrieval; 1.3 Status Confirmation Notes/Sensitivity: This is a high-priority item, representing a significant investment for both the student and UQAM's strategic planning. Ensure all communications are conducted professionally and maintain confidential information within the scope of UQAM’s data. --- Do you need me to elaborate on anything? (e.g., suggest specific meeting agendas, highlight potential questions to address during the initial briefing, add a specific weighting to the ‘Priority’ metric) todoist-labels:: #outlook365 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-01-16 JSSOFTWARE-D-25-01931 todoist-id:: 6fPwRv3QpfVM6p4g todoist-project:: #📜 REVIEWS todoist-due:: 2026-01-16 todoist-desc:: From: em@editorialmanager.com Received: 2025-12-01T12:45:47Z ✉: Web Link --- Okay, here’s a summary of the email content, broken down into actionable steps, ready for a task description: Task Summary: The email is requesting a review of a manuscript titled "What Does Current Research Say About the Viability of Low-Code Development?" submitted to The Journal of Systems & Software by Dongmei Gao et al. The email emphasizes the importance of the review for the journal and provides clear instructions on how to proceed (agree, decline, or register a response). It also details the process of reviewing the manuscript, including a checklist of key areas to examine and the identification of contextual factors and potential benefits/challenges within LCD adoption. Actionable Steps & Recommendations (as instructions for a task): 1. Review the Manuscript: Carefully examine the paper for relevant details regarding Low-Code Development. Pay particular attention to the listed thematic areas – the benefits, challenges, and social aspects of LCD adoption. 2. Confirm Review Agreement: If you accept the review, click the link below: https://track.editorialmanager.com/CL0/https://www.editorialmanager.com/jssoftware/. 3. Provide Feedback (if applicable): If you are assigned a reviewer, please provide constructive feedback to ensure the manuscript receives the evaluation it deserves. Focus on the identified contextual factors and the strengths and weaknesses of the research. 4. Reviewer Recognition: Log into the Editorial Manager for The Journal of Systems & Software as a reviewer: Editorial Manager®. You'll need your username: davide.diruscio@univaq.it. 5. Respond to the Email: Reply to the email stating your acceptance, decline or providing a response to the reviewers. 6. Register Reviewer: Register as a reviewer within the Editorial Manager: https://www.reviewerrecognition.elsevier.com/. Ensure you have your username (davide.diruscio@univaq.it) and password. 7. Access Resources: Utilize the provided resources: Journal Article Publishing Support Center to learn about the Reviewer Hub, and https://www.reviewerrecognition.elsevier.com/ for more details about the review process. 8. Follow Guidelines: Carefully adhere to the Elsevier Reviewer Guidelines (https://service.elsevier.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/14156/supporthub/publishing/
  #REV_JSSOFTWARE#). To make the task actionable, you could create a checklist of these steps. You could also document the key findings identified in the literature review and present those findings in a brief summary. --- Re manuscript: JSSOFTWARE-D-25-01931. Title: What Does Current Research Say About the Viability of Low-Code Development? A Systematic Literature Review. Authors: Dongmei Gao; Fabian Fagerholm; Vilma Toivanen. Dear Dr. Davide Di Ruscio, The above todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-01-16 PAPERS-2025-FSE-NIER-Detoxing-LLM todoist-id:: 6fQf2hXxFC253V48 todoist-project:: #✏️ PAPERS todoist-due:: 2026-01-16 todoist-desc:: [FSE 2026] - Unlearning Machine - Online LaTeX Editor Overleaf todoist-labels:: #goal todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-01-16 andare da telepass todoist-id:: 6fjjm787rxjRMXxg todoist-project:: #Inbox todoist-due:: 2026-01-16 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-01-16 Fare richiesta liquidazione missione todoist-id:: 6f8969xXrcv9xvxc todoist-project:: #✈ Missioni todoist-due:: 2026-01-16 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-01-16 Paper con Alf todoist-id:: 6fmMjW88FQ9m8x2g todoist-project:: #✏️ PAPERS todoist-due:: 2026-01-16 todoist-desc:: WebLink: Outlook Email Content Summary: - Initial impression and feedback request on the draft. - Recognize lack of extensive data on case study part, no certifiable evidence available. - Suggestion to clarify the exploratory nature of data and possibly cut detailed parts accordingly. - Latex file hosted on Overleaf to be shared later. - Reference to using IEEE software standards; draft might need trimming or condensing. - Discussion about restructuring submission plans due to draft length. - Deep review and improved figures needed, specifically on asymmetry and traceability matrix analysis. - Deadline implied: review needed by weekend (from email dated 14 Jan 2026). Action Points Extracted: 1. Share Overleaf latex file. 2. Review draft for trimming or condensing. 3. Clarify exploratory nature of case study data. 4. Discuss and possibly revise submission plans based on draft length. 5. Revise and improve figures. 6. Analyze traceability matrix deeply. 7. Complete review by the weekend of 17 January 2026. todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-01-16 Meeting progetti "FRINGE" e "TRex-SE" - 5-6/11 a Benevento todoist-id:: 6f74VXXr7f3cw9m8 todoist-project:: #✈ Missioni todoist-due:: 2026-01-16 todoist-desc:: From: disorbo@unisannio.it Received: 2025-10-20T10:16:20Z ✉: Web Link --- Carissimi, Vi ricordo del meeting congiunto dei progetti "FRINGE" e "TRex-SE" che abbiamo schedulato per il pomeriggio del 5 Novembre e la mattina del 6 Novembre a Benevento. La location è il Polo Didattico di via delle Puglie (trovate il link a Goo todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-01-16 Cybersecurity Project Final Event - Spoke 8 todoist-id:: 6f97V5qm8xcWFFQ8 todoist-project:: #✈ Missioni todoist-due:: 2026-01-16 todoist-desc:: From: valeria.ferrari12@unibo.it Received: 2025-10-29T08:49:48Z ✉: Web Link --- Buongiorno a tutti, come anticipato, a dicembre si terrà l’evento finale dello Spoke 8 del progetto SERICS. L’evento di terrà a Bologna, presso Starhotels Excelsior, in data 11 e 12 dicembre (diversamente fa quanto precedentemente comunicato, avendo todoist-status:: ◼️