logseq/pages/todoist___2026-01-23.md

• 2026-01-23 Acquistare trasformatore todoist-id:: 6fWf6CF6R77g64wg todoist-project:: #📗 Personal todoist-due:: 2026-01-23 todoist-desc:: RemaTarlazzi S.p.A. · Via Nuova, 7/a, 67051 Avezzano AQ, Italy Telefono 0863455041 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-01-23 R: Aggiornamento Paper DRAMA: Nuova Metodologia e Risultati todoist-id:: 6fW295wjFjqGj5c8 todoist-project:: #✏️ PAPERS todoist-due:: 2026-01-23 todoist-desc:: Web Link Okay, here’s a task description for the email “R: Aggiornamento Paper DRAMA: Nuova Metodologia e Risultati,” crafted with actionable steps, aiming to help someone understand and complete the task: Task Title: Finalize & Share the DRAMA Paper Update Description: This task focuses on finalizing the updated DRAMA paper and ensuring it’s presented effectively to stakeholders. It involves reviewing the document, incorporating feedback, and preparing it for distribution. Actionable Steps: 1. Review the Document: Carefully read the entire updated DRAMA paper. Pay particular attention to the section regarding [Specifically mention the key section or data point the paper focuses on - e.g., methodology, results, conclusions]. 2. Gather Feedback: Share the document with [Assignee - specify who needs to review it - e.g., Team Lead, Senior Analyst]. Actively solicit feedback on clarity, accuracy, and completeness. 3. Address Feedback: Respond to each piece of feedback received. Document all changes made based on feedback. Prioritize revisions based on the severity of the feedback. 4. Incorporate Changes: Implement the necessary revisions to ensure the document accurately reflects the updated methodology and results. 5. Draft a Summary/Executive Summary: Create a concise executive summary highlighting the key takeaways, the updated methodology, and the most significant results (approximately [Specify length – e.g., 1-2 paragraphs]). 6. Finalize & Format: Ensure the document is properly formatted, including consistent headings, tables, figures, and citations. 7. Prepare for Distribution: Choose the appropriate distribution method (e.g., email, shared drive, presentation). Consider adding a brief introductory paragraph explaining the update. 8. Proofread: Conduct a final proofread to catch any errors before final submission. Priority: Medium - This task requires focused effort and attention to detail. Due Date: [Specify a realistic deadline – e.g., End of Day Tomorrow] Notes: If you have any specific areas you’d like me to focus on during the review, please let me know. --- To help me refine this further and make it even better, could you tell me: * Who is the intended audience for this task? (e.g., Team, Management, Clients?) * What is the specific goal of the updated paper? (e.g., present a new strategy, demonstrate improved efficiency, provide data insights?) todoist-labels:: #outlook365 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-01-23 Request for Coordination of Erasmus+ Credit Mobility Visit KA131-KA171-2025 todoist-id:: 6fhmv6WmXqMGW2j6 todoist-project:: #📧EmailsToAnswer todoist-due:: 2026-01-23 todoist-desc:: From: m.s.trab@hotmail.com Received: 2026-01-08T09:03:19Z ✉: Web Link --- Okay, here's a synthesized summary of the email content, broken down into actionable tasks and a brief explanation of the key points: Summary of Email Content: The email is requesting Professor Di Ruscio's availability as the responsible professor for coordinating a Erasmus+ credit mobility visit to the University of L’Aquila (Department of Information Engineering, Computer Science and Mathematics). The primary task is to review and collaborate on the proposed mobility programme, ensuring alignment with department priorities and ongoing initiatives. The email also provides attached documents: a CV and a proposed mobility programme. Finally, it includes contact information and a thank you for their guidance. Actionable Tasks & Recommendations: 1. Review the Proposed Mobility Programme: Carefully examine the proposed mobility programme – the attachments provided. Ensure it aligns with the department’s specific goals, research areas, and current projects. 2. Review CV: Thoroughly analyze the CV to understand the applicant's qualifications and experience, particularly relevant to the Erasmus+ visit. 3. Collaborate on Academic & Training Activities: Work with the applicant to define the specific learning and research activities that should be undertaken during the visit. Establish clear objectives and expected outcomes. 4. Agreement on Programmatic Details: Discuss and finalize the details of the program. This includes: * Timeline: Set a realistic timeline for the project's completion. * Budget: Establish a budget for resources and travel. * Responsibilities: Clearly delineate the roles and responsibilities of both the applicant and the professor. 5. Provide Feedback: Offer constructive feedback on the proposed mobility programme. This includes suggestions for improvements to enhance the student’s experience and contribution to the department's goals. 6. Confirmation & Next Steps: Formalize the agreement and schedule a follow-up meeting or communication to discuss the collaboration further. 7. Contact Information: Double-check the contact details provided. Let me know if you'd like me to elaborate on any of these tasks or provide more specific suggestions! --- Dear Prof. Di Ruscio, I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to kindly request your availability to act as the responsible professor for coordinating my upcoming Erasmus+ credit mobility visit to the University of L’Aquila, specifically within todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-01-23 Claude per il RG2.2 todoist-id:: 9945339016 todoist-project:: #Inbox todoist-completed:: 2026-01-23 todoist-status:: ✅
• 2026-01-23 Autonomous System project proposal todoist-id:: 9939674671 todoist-project:: #Inbox todoist-completed:: 2026-01-23 todoist-status:: ✅
• 2026-01-23 TOOL DEMO TRACK - MODELS 2026 Organizing Committee todoist-id:: 6fQ7HCGxPvcHGHgg todoist-project:: #💺 EditoringChairing todoist-due:: 2026-01-23 todoist-desc:: From: lolaburgueno@uma.es todoist-labels:: #goal #logseqed todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-01-23 MODELS APCs and important dates todoist-id:: 6fm3JCRq69FHV6m8 todoist-project:: #💺 EditoringChairing todoist-due:: 2026-01-23 todoist-desc:: From: lolaburgueno@uma.es Received: 2026-01-13T16:10:20Z ✉: Web Link --- Here's a summary of the email and actionable tasks: Task Summary: This email provides important updates for the MODELS OC members regarding ACM Article Processing Charges (APCs) and key event dates. For APCs, it clarifies that extended abstracts (5 pages or less) will be free, while full papers will incur fees unless covered by institutional agreements. The cost for full papers depends on ACM membership status of the corresponding author. NIER papers are still under discussion. The email also directs members to a shared calendar for all important MODELS event dates, highlighting an August 14th deadline for camera-ready submissions. Actionable Tasks: * Review APC Policy and Update CFP: * Action: Carefully read and understand the ACM APC policy outlined in the email. * Action: Adjust the Call for Papers (CFP) for your track to encourage submissions of "extended abstracts" (5 pages or less) instead of "short papers" to avoid publishing fees for authors. * Action: Ensure the CFP clearly communicates the APC policy, especially regarding full papers and institutional coverage. * Action: Note that NIER papers have specific rules that are still being finalized. * Consult Important Dates Calendar: * Action: Access the provided calendar link: MODELS 2026 | Teamup * Action: Familiarize yourself with all the important dates for the MODELS events. * Action: [Todoist Task] Ensure all camera-ready versions are submitted by August 14th. * Address Questions and Clarifications: * Action: If you have any doubts or questions regarding the APCs or event dates, contact Lola Burgueño. --- Dear MODELS OC members, This email is to inform you of two main points: - ACM APCs (Article Processing Charges) - Important dates 1. APCs / publishing fees Today I, together with the workshop chairs and proceedings chairs, had a meeting with th todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-01-23 Dottorato di Ricerca - Nuove proposte e rinnovi - XLII ciclo - a.a.2026/2027. todoist-id:: 6fq4jcrv89PW5c78 todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT todoist-due:: 2026-01-23 todoist-desc:: From: dot@strutture.univaq.it Received: 2026-01-22T09:36:00Z ✉: Web Link --- The email transmits a note with protocol number 10497 dated January 22, 2026, regarding a specific subject. Task: Forward note prot. n. 10497 of 22/01/2026. Recommended Actions: * Access the email content and locate the attached or referenced note. * Forward the note to the relevant individuals or departments. * Ensure proper documentation or logging of the forwarding action, if required. Deadline: January 22, 2026. --- Trasmettiamo la nota prot. n. 10497 del 22/01/2026 relativa all'oggetto.. Cordiali saluti Simonetta Ricciardi Università degli Studi dell'Aquila Settore Dottorati, Assegni e Borse di Ricerca Palazzo Camponeschi Piazza Santa Margherita, 2 Te todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-01-23 JSSOFTWARE-D-25-01931 todoist-id:: 6fPwRv3QpfVM6p4g todoist-project:: #📜 REVIEWS todoist-due:: 2026-01-23 todoist-desc:: From: em@editorialmanager.com Received: 2025-12-01T12:45:47Z ✉: Web Link --- Okay, here’s a summary of the email content, broken down into actionable steps, ready for a task description: Task Summary: The email is requesting a review of a manuscript titled "What Does Current Research Say About the Viability of Low-Code Development?" submitted to The Journal of Systems & Software by Dongmei Gao et al. The email emphasizes the importance of the review for the journal and provides clear instructions on how to proceed (agree, decline, or register a response). It also details the process of reviewing the manuscript, including a checklist of key areas to examine and the identification of contextual factors and potential benefits/challenges within LCD adoption. Actionable Steps & Recommendations (as instructions for a task): 1. Review the Manuscript: Carefully examine the paper for relevant details regarding Low-Code Development. Pay particular attention to the listed thematic areas – the benefits, challenges, and social aspects of LCD adoption. 2. Confirm Review Agreement: If you accept the review, click the link below: https://track.editorialmanager.com/CL0/https://www.editorialmanager.com/jssoftware/. 3. Provide Feedback (if applicable): If you are assigned a reviewer, please provide constructive feedback to ensure the manuscript receives the evaluation it deserves. Focus on the identified contextual factors and the strengths and weaknesses of the research. 4. Reviewer Recognition: Log into the Editorial Manager for The Journal of Systems & Software as a reviewer: Editorial Manager®. You'll need your username: davide.diruscio@univaq.it. 5. Respond to the Email: Reply to the email stating your acceptance, decline or providing a response to the reviewers. 6. Register Reviewer: Register as a reviewer within the Editorial Manager: https://www.reviewerrecognition.elsevier.com/. Ensure you have your username (davide.diruscio@univaq.it) and password. 7. Access Resources: Utilize the provided resources: Journal Article Publishing Support Center to learn about the Reviewer Hub, and https://www.reviewerrecognition.elsevier.com/ for more details about the review process. 8. Follow Guidelines: Carefully adhere to the Elsevier Reviewer Guidelines (https://service.elsevier.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/14156/supporthub/publishing/
  #REV_JSSOFTWARE#). To make the task actionable, you could create a checklist of these steps. You could also document the key findings identified in the literature review and present those findings in a brief summary. --- Re manuscript: JSSOFTWARE-D-25-01931. Title: What Does Current Research Say About the Viability of Low-Code Development? A Systematic Literature Review. Authors: Dongmei Gao; Fabian Fagerholm; Vilma Toivanen. Dear Dr. Davide Di Ruscio, The above todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-01-23 🧠​​ Invitation to Serve as External Reviewer for Doctoral Thesis Evaluation at UOC NIT's Doctoral Programme todoist-id:: 6fmhWrq9vQFGFXwg todoist-project:: #📜 REVIEWS todoist-due:: 2026-01-23 todoist-desc:: Subject: Invitation for Doctoral Thesis Evaluation at UOC NIT's doctoral programme Weblink: Outlook Content Summary: You have been invited by the Doctoral Program in Network and Information Technologies at Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC) to be an external reviewer for a doctoral thesis preliminary assessment. The thesis candidate is Sergio Morales García with the thesis titled "Automated Testing of Social Bias and Non-Discrimination Requirements in Generative AI". The thesis supervisors are Dr. Robert Clarisó and Dr. Jordi Cabot. You are asked to provide a confidential evaluation report to help the Academic Committee decide on authorizing the oral defense of the thesis. The report should evaluate the originality and quality of the thesis but is not a final judgment. If you accept, you will receive the thesis document and an evaluation template. A Conflict of Interest document must be signed. The remuneration is €100 gross. Report submission deadline: 3 weeks from acceptance. Tasks created as subtasks below to help you manage and complete this assignment effectively. todoist-labels:: #ai-generated-main-task todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-01-23 Fwd: Decision on your submission - JSSOFTWARE-D-25-01604 todoist-id:: 6fpXr6XWhhcQWfrc todoist-project:: #📧EmailsToAnswer todoist-due:: 2026-01-23 todoist-desc:: From: disorbo@unisannio.it Received: 2026-01-20T09:03:13Z ✉: Web Link --- Here's a summary of the email content and the corresponding actionable task: Task Summary: The email is a rejection notification from the Journal of Systems and Software (JSS) for the submission "Examining Fairness Issues in Machine Learning-based Systems" (Ref. No.: JSSOFTWARE-D-25-01604). While the paper is rejected, the editor strongly advises resubmission after addressing the reviewers' detailed comments. The reviewers highlight significant areas for improvement in the manuscript's framing of fairness, integration of related work, methodological structure and detail (especially for the qualitative analysis), dataset selection justification, and the significance and implications of the results. The resubmitted paper will be treated as a new submission. Actionable Task: Task: Revise and Resubmit Paper to Journal of Systems and Software Description: The submission "Examining Fairness Issues in Machine Learning-based Systems" (Ref. No.: JSSOFTWARE-D-25-01604) has been rejected by the Journal of Systems and Software. However, the editor encourages resubmission after addressing detailed reviewer comments. Key areas for improvement include: * Framing of Fairness: Clearly define whether fairness is treated as a technical, socio-technical, or hybrid concern. * Related Work: Synthesize the literature into a coherent argument rather than an enumerative survey. * Methodology: * Present a unified methodological structure with clear workflows and transitions between phases. * Provide more detailed explanations for the qualitative coding process, including iteration, rater interaction, and reliance on LLM summaries. * Clarify the sequencing of methodological steps and ensure logical dependencies. * Justify dataset selection criteria and report exclusion numbers. * Ensure consistency between research questions and the role of LLMs. * Consider extending the dataset size if feasible through pre-screening. * Results and Discussion: * Explicitly discuss novel vs. incremental findings and align with previous empirical work. * Provide concrete examples of implications for practitioners. * Consider adding new research questions and discussions. * Clarify the rationale for using large language models. * Overall Cohesion: Improve the integration and cohesion across different methods employed in the study. Recommended Actions: 1. Thoroughly read and understand all reviewer comments. 2. Develop a detailed plan to address each comment. Categorize comments by theme (e.g., Introduction, Methodology, Results, Discussion) to facilitate systematic revision. 3. Rewrite sections of the manuscript based on the reviewer feedback, focusing on the identified weaknesses. 4. Prepare a comprehensive response letter detailing how each reviewer comment has been addressed. 5. Ensure the resubmitted manuscript is treated as a NEW submission but consider disclosing the original submission information and reference number. 6. Consult empirical research guidelines (e.g., Paul Ralph et al. 2020) for structuring the revised manuscript and methodology. 7. Consider creating a methodological diagram to clarify the workflow. No Deadline: The email does not specify a deadline for resubmission. --- Buongiorno a tutti, vi giro la mail ricevuta da JSS. Saluti, Andrea ---------- Forwarded message --------- Da: Journal of Systems and Software em@editorialmanager.com Date: lun 19 gen 2026 alle ore 10:59 Subject: Decision on your submission todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-01-23 Mandare sillabi corsi / integrazione OdG prossimo collegio todoist-id:: 6fqFcXcJXmC9rJvh todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT todoist-due:: 2026-01-23 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-01-23 Risentire il venditore per quando vederci todoist-id:: 9877634639 todoist-project:: #Inbox todoist-completed:: 2026-01-23 todoist-status:: ✅
• 2026-01-23 Sentire il Notaio todoist-id:: 9877634430 todoist-project:: #Inbox todoist-completed:: 2026-01-23 todoist-status:: ✅
• 2026-01-23 Google Antigravity Product todoist-id:: 9941930166 todoist-project:: #Inbox todoist-completed:: 2026-01-23 todoist-status:: ✅
• 2026-01-23 R: missione dottoranda todoist-id:: 9931180407 todoist-project:: #Inbox todoist-completed:: 2026-01-23 todoist-status:: ✅