logseq/pages/todoist___2026-02-04.md

• 2026-02-04 PAPERS/J-Collaborative-Development todoist-id:: 6fmMjW88FQ9m8x2g todoist-project:: #✏️ PAPERS todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: WebLink: Outlook todoist-labels:: #goal #logseqed todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Aggiornamento uso fondi progetti todoist-id:: 6XwPqff8MCr394FX todoist-project:: #🏢 Admin todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-labels:: #logseqed todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Dottorati - PNRR: Conferma dati di monitoraggio, ciclo 38 todoist-id:: 6fV4f925QC5xJMH8 todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: Web Link Task Title: Monitoring Data Confirmation for Cycle 38 Description: The task is to confirm and validate the monitoring data for cycle 38 in accordance with the PNRR (National Recovery and Resilience Plan) guidelines. This involves reviewing and verifying the accuracy of the data provided by the stakeholders, including the local authorities, universities, and other relevant organizations. Actionable Steps: 1. Review the monitoring data provided by the stakeholders for cycle 38, ensuring it meets the PNRR guidelines. 2. Verify the accuracy of the data by cross-checking it with relevant sources, such as official records or direct communication with the stakeholders. 3. Identify any discrepancies or errors in the data and request corrections from the stakeholders as needed. 4. Document any issues or concerns regarding the data and provide recommendations for improvement. 5. Provide a summary of the confirmed monitoring data to the relevant authorities and stakeholders. 6. Maintain accurate records of the data confirmation process for future reference. By accomplishing these steps, you will have successfully confirmed and validated the monitoring data for cycle 38 in accordance with PNRR guidelines, ensuring that the data is accurate and reliable for decision-making purposes. todoist-labels:: #outlook365 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Dottorati - PNRR: Conferma dati di monitoraggio, ciclo 39 todoist-id:: 6fV4fHM64mx54fVg todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: Web Link Task Title: Monitoring Data Confirmation for Cycle 39 Task Description: Review and confirm the monitoring data provided in the email from Dottorati - PNRR for cycle 39. The task involves verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data, ensuring it meets the required standards, and confirming that all necessary information has been collected and recorded. Actionable Steps: 1. Open the email from Dottorati - PNRR and download the monitoring data file(s). 2. Review the data files to ensure they are complete and accurate, and that all required fields are filled in. 3. Identify any discrepancies or errors in the data and communicate them to the relevant parties for correction. 4. Confirm with Dottorati - PNRR that the data has been reviewed and approved. 5. Document the outcome of the data confirmation process, including any issues or discrepancies identified, and any actions taken to address them. 6. Update any relevant systems or databases with the confirmed monitoring data. 7. Notify stakeholders of the completed task and the status of the monitoring data. Estimated Time: 1-2 hours Priority Level: Medium Assign To: [Your Name] todoist-labels:: #outlook365 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Dottorati - PNRR: Conferma dati di monitoraggio, ciclo 38 todoist-id:: 6fh4WC4P82WVJMRg todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: From: no-reply@cineca.it Received: 2026-01-05T07:01:49Z ✉: Web Link --- Okay, here’s a synthesized task description based on the email content, focusing on actionable steps: Task: Verify and Finalize PNRR Project Monitoring Data Objective: Confirm and finalize the PNRR project monitoring data within the designated timeframe. Actionable Steps: 1. Confirm with Rector/Office of the Head: Remind the Subject Attuator (Rector/Office of the Head) that data for the 38th cycle of the PNRR program needs to be confirmed in the monitoring section of the scrivatory office (via the "conferma" button). This is due on January 10, 2026. 2. Access Data via PNRR Monitoring: Locate and access the "Visualizza dati monitoraggio" (View Monitoring Data) button in the scrivatory office. 3. Review & Verify Data: Examine the data presented within the "Visualizza dati monitoraggio" to ensure it accurately reflects the state of art for each PNRR investment project. 4. Issue Tickets for Support: If there are any operational issues or require support (“informatico”), proceed exclusively through opening support tickets to CINECA at: Richiesta Supporto 5. Confirmation: Ensure all the information provided is accurate and meets the requirements of the PNRR program. Note: This task is crucial for meeting the deadline and maintaining the accuracy of the PNRR project monitoring documentation. --- Let me know if you'd like me to refine this further (e.g., add specific instructions for troubleshooting, or prioritize certain actions). --- Si ricorda al Soggetto attuatore (Rettore/Ufficio Dottorati) che entro il giorno 10/01/2026, per il 38° ciclo è necessario confermare nella sezione dei dati di monitoraggio presente nella scrivania (cliccando sul tasto "conferma") i dati precedentemente i todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Dottorati - PNRR: Conferma dati di monitoraggio, ciclo 39 todoist-id:: 6fh4WC6m8MJGJ5Q8 todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: From: no-reply@cineca.it Received: 2026-01-05T07:02:36Z ✉: Web Link --- --- Si ricorda al Soggetto attuatore (Rettore/Ufficio Dottorati) che entro il giorno 10/01/2026, per il 39° ciclo è necessario confermare nella sezione dei dati di monitoraggio presente nella scrivania (cliccando sul tasto "conferma") i dati precedentemente i todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Giudizio Dottorandi RG2.2 in NOTION todoist-id:: 6fG5CgvFVwF3mR7h todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Organizzare Worskhop su AI / Agenti / Edge interagendo con SImone Gianfranceschi di Intecs todoist-id:: 6fQcCRJxh5pvMgrg todoist-project:: #📻​ Services-RadioLabs todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: Link to Logseq todoist-labels:: #source_logseq todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Contattare studenti restituzione portatili todoist-id:: 6f82x4WFg69Jmr99 todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 [grin-list] questionario sulla nuova ASN todoist-id:: 6cR9PX3pvWxwQPQg todoist-project:: #👷 WORK todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: From: fabio.gadducci@unipi.it Received: 2025-07-23T09:00:54Z ✉: Web Link --- Cari tutti e care tutte, come sapete, e’ al momento in discussione al Parlamento un disegno di legge che riscrive le regole dell’ASN. Nella versione attuale viene abolita la commissione, e i candidati semplicemente auto-certificheranno i propri tito todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Chiedere Donatella per Juri todoist-id:: 6frjgc5gjf6c98r8 todoist-project:: #🦮 Mentoring todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Re: Seduta Senato Accademico - 25 novembre 2025 todoist-id:: 6fWQGqhWfCMRvqV8 todoist-project:: #👷 WORK todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: Web Link Okay, here's a task description created based on the provided email content, designed for actionable completion: Task Title: Schedule and Prepare for 25 November 2025 Senate Sedat Education Confer ence Task Description: This email requests the scheduling and preliminary preparation for a Senate Education Conference scheduled for November 25th, 2025. As the lead organizer, your primary responsibility is to secure the space, confirm logistics, and ensure a productive experience for participating senators. Suggested Action Items & Deliverables: * Confirm Attendance & Confirm Seats: Verify with the Senator involved and confirm the number of attendees for the conference. Confirm that seats are pre-allocated for the necessary number of senators. * Venue Space: Contact the university/location providing the venue space and ascertain the room capacity, accessibility features, and available resources needed. Determine the best date and time for the conference, considering student schedules. * Abstract/Presentation Material Review: Quickly review the submitted abstract(s) or presentation materials to ensure they are presented professionally and are prepared in a standard format. This is crucial for a smooth and professional experience. * Virtual/Hybrid Logistics: Determine if the conference will be held virtually or in-person. If virtual, initiate preparation for platform setting (Zoom/Teams/Similar), ensuring a strong Wi-Fi and technical support option. For in-person, create a detailed logistics schedule - guest list, registration, parking information. * Budget Considerations (Initial Stage): Begin preliminary estimation for potential costs related to venue rental/facilities, catering (lunch/dinner), equipment (projectors/whiteboards), digital platform fees (if applicable). A rough budget should be created ASAP. Next Steps: Please provide a status update by Friday. Let me know if you need any further information/support. --- To help me refine this further (if needed), could you tell me: * What is the overall goal of this conference? Is it about showcasing new research, policy discussions, or something else? * Do you have any existing meeting schedules or logistical concerns within the email context? todoist-labels:: #outlook365 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Fw: [WG SSQ] - Riunione dei Nodi 22 Dicembre 2026 h 15 - Wshop QuCS todoist-id:: 6ffmwgH5mR3XFXM8 todoist-project:: #👷 WORK todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: From: salvatore.distefano@unime.it Received: 2025-12-30T16:33:44Z ✉: Web Link --- Okay, let's break down this document and create a detailed action plan to complete the task. The document is a web page displaying a meeting invitation for a Google Group called "Quantitative Methods in Informatics." Here's a breakdown of what it’s saying and what needs to be done to follow through: 1. Understanding the Purpose & Context * Meeting Invitation: The document is a notification about a meeting scheduled within Google Groups dedicated to quantitative methods. * Key Attendees: The group is likely comprised of researchers, analysts, and others interested in this topic. * Action Required: The user needs to respond to the meeting invitation and confirm their attendance. 2. Action Plan - Step-by-Step Here’s a breakdown of what to do, prioritized by urgency: Phase 1: Immediate Response (Within 24 Hours) 1. Read the Invitation Carefully: Thoroughly understand the meeting details: * Date & Time: Confirm the exact time. * Location: Where is the meeting held? (Zoom link, Google Meet URL, etc.) * Agenda: What topics will be discussed? (This helps prepare.) * Required Materials/Preparation: Are there any documents to review beforehand? 2. Respond to the Meeting Invitation: * Confirm Attendance: Reply immediately: “Yes, I’m coming!” or “I’ll be there.” * Briefly Confirm: A short, polite acknowledgement is sufficient (e.g., "Great, looking forward to it!") 3. Check Your Calendar: Ensure your schedule doesn’t conflict with the meeting. Phase 2: Preparation & Engagement (1-2 Days Before) 4. Review Materials (If Applicable): If the agenda includes documents, pre-read them. 5. Prepare Questions/Contributions: Think about what you want to discuss. Jot down some initial thoughts or questions. This demonstrates engagement. 6. Join the Discussion (Optional): Consider participating in the discussion if you have relevant expertise or insights. Phase 3: Confirmation & Attendance (Day of Meeting) 7. Confirm Attendance (via Group Chat): If it’s a Google Meet, reply to the chat and confirm your participation. (e.g., “I'm in!”) 8. Review the Agenda: Quickly glance at the agenda again to make sure you're prepared. 9. Prepare for the Meeting: If you're contributing, think about what you'll share. 10. Join the Meeting: Log in to the meeting link. Phase 4: Post-Meeting (Immediately After) 11. Note Key Takeaways: Shortly after the meeting, jot down any key takeaways, decisions made, or action items assigned. 12. Follow Up (If Needed): If you have specific questions or feedback, reach out to the organizers or attendees. 3. Tools & Resources (Useful for the Action Plan) * Google Calendar: For scheduling and calendar visibility. * Google Groups: To find relevant meetings and communication within the group. * Zoom/Google Meet/Other Meeting Platform: For the actual meeting. 4. Important Considerations * Respect Group Rules: Follow any guidelines or etiquette established within the Google Group. * Be Professional: Maintain a polite and respectful tone in your communication. --- To help me refine this further, could you tell me: * What specifically are you hoping to do after responding to the invitation? (e.g., do you need to provide specific details, share a thought, or take a particular action?) --- Cari, mando a un ristretto gruppo di amici un reminder per il Wshop QuCS su quantitative CyberSec per ItaSec. Tutti noi siamo stati coinvolti, direttamente o indirettamente in SERICS, e potrebbe essere una buona venue per interagire con la comunità di c todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 TOSEM-2025-1288 - Reviewer agreed todoist-id:: 6fhqXj3C4Hm4fjR8 todoist-project:: #📜 REVIEWS todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: From: onbehalfof@manuscriptcentral.com Received: 2026-01-08T15:15:16Z ✉: Web Link --- Okay, here's a summary of the email, formatted as a task description with actionable steps: Task: Review Manuscript - 'Evaluating Incompatible Third-party Library API Usage in LLM-based Code Completion' Objective: To thoroughly review the provided manuscript titled "Evaluating Incompatible Third-party Library API Usage in LLM-based Code Completion" submitted to Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology. Instructions: 1. Locate Manuscript: Access the manuscript at: * ScholarOne Manuscripts * Alternatively, access the manuscript through the system at: [http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tosem (in the reviewer center)] 2. System Login & Paper Download: Follow the instructions to log in to the system and download the manuscript. 3. Review and Identify Missing Literature: * Identify any relevant literature that is missing from the reference list. * For each relevant paper: * Collect the names of all authors. * Retrieve the paper title. * Retrieve the journal/book title where the paper was published. * Find the year of publication. * Obtain the URL link to the paper. * Justify why this source is relevant – highlight a key aspect or contribution. 4. Report Generation: Create a report summarizing your findings, including the bibliographic information of the relevant literature. 5. Report Formatting: Use the provided template for report formatting. Deliverable: A completed report containing the collected bibliographic information and justification for the identified literature. Notes: The primary focus is on verifying the accuracy and completeness of the manuscript's bibliographic information and identifying potential missing sources of literature. Ensure the report highlights key findings and is well-organized. --- 08-Jan-2026 Dear Dr. Di Ruscio, Thank you for agreeing to review the following paper submitted for possible publication to Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology: Evaluating Incompatible Third-party Library API Usage in LLM-based Co todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Tosem-2024-0255.R2 - Revised Version todoist-id:: 6fmfrW83479F5cfc todoist-project:: #📜 REVIEWS todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: Weblink: Outlook Email Content Summary: You are requested to review the revised version of the paper titled "Towards AI-Native Software Engineering (SE 3.0): A Vision and a Challenge Roadmap" submitted to Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM) with manuscript ID TOSEM-2024-0255.R2. The review is to be completed within 4 weeks. Links to the manuscript system where you can download the paper, update your information, access previous review comments, and submit your review report are provided. Please identify missing relevant papers in the references and include comprehensive bibliographic information in your review report. For any login issues, contact atemplet@gmail.com. Referee guidelines are available at https://www.acm.org/publications/policies/peer-review. This task is assigned considering your role as Davide Di Ruscio, coordinator of the PhD in ICT program at the University of L'Aquila. todoist-labels:: #ai-generated #ai-generated-main-task todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 🧠​​ EASE 2026 Research Papers Track todoist-id:: 6frFf4WCxMV283m6 todoist-project:: #📜 REVIEWS todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: Subject: [EASE 2026] Research Papers Track Paper Assignment Sender: ease2026@easychair.org Weblink: Outlook Summary: You are assigned to review 226 research papers for EASE 2026, with an expected load of 5-6 papers each. Access the submissions via EasyChair for EASE 2026. Main Instructions: - Provide positive and constructive reviews focusing on novelty, significance, soundness, verifiability, transparency, and presentation. - Follow the IEEE Code of Conduct and optionally refer to the Empirical Standards Checklist. - Use the scoring system: strong accept, accept, weak accept, weak reject, reject. Lead Reviewer Responsibilities (if designated): - Initiate and drive the discussion to reach consensus. - Check reviews for issues and request changes. - Write a meta-review summarizing discussion and rationale without revealing reviewer identities. Deadlines (AoE): - Paper assignment: January 27th - Reviews due: February 26th - Online discussion and meta-review: February 27th – March 10th - Notification date: March 13th Assigned Papers: - (46) A framework for Evaluating Bias in LLM-Generated Code - (62) A Universal Textual Merge Strategy Based on Tokens for Version Control Systems - (108) STLGT: A Scalable Trace-Based Linear Graph Transformer for Tail Latency Prediction in Microservices - (118) Sustainability of Open Source Machine Learning Robustness Assessment Tools: A Repository Mining Study - (184) Exploring Creativity in Human–Human-LLM Collaborative Software Design Subtasks: 1. Log in to EasyChair and access assigned submissions. (Due: Jan 27) 2. Review each assigned paper with positivity and constructiveness. 3. Use the scoring system to rate papers. 4. If lead reviewer, drive discussions, check reviews, and write meta-reviews. (Discussion phase: Feb 27 - Mar 10) 5. Submit all reviews by February 26. 6. Participate in online discussions and submit meta-review if applicable between February 27 and March 10. 7. Await notification on March 13. Please ensure to keep all reviews respectful and support your evaluations thoroughly. Contact program chairs Silvia Abrahão and Xin Xia for any questions. todoist-labels:: #ai-generated-main-task todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 🧠​​ Manage EASE 2026 Leading Reviewer Submission Review Process todoist-id:: 6frGf8cR7g3RFwMg todoist-project:: #📜 REVIEWS todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: Subject: EASE2026 submission assignment (as leading reviewers) Sender: ease2026@easychair.org Weblink: Outlook Content Summary: You are assigned as the Leading Reviewer for papers (62) and (184) in the EASE 2026 conference. Your role involves facilitating the review process by ensuring review quality, initiating and moderating discussions, and writing a meta-review with a recommendation. Subtasks: 1. Check colleagues' reviews for appropriate and constructive language. Request clarifications through EasyChair comments if issues are found. 2. Initiate the discussion starting February 27th, even if some reviews are still missing. 3. Moderate the discussion to help reach a consensus by March 10th. 4. Write a brief meta-review summarizing the discussion and giving a recommendation (accept/reject) for the Program Chairs. 5. Submit your final recommendations by March 10th, AoE. Deadline: March 10th, AoE Labels: ai-generated-main-task todoist-labels:: #ai-generated-main-task todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Deliverable D3.2 todoist-id:: 6fVRXMVJWRWQ2fgG todoist-project:: #🚀 Projects-EU-MOSAICO todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: MOSAICO D3.2 - Online LaTeX Editor Overleaf todoist-labels:: #goal #logseqed todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Richiesta di autorizzazione missione in attesa di decisione: percipiente MARTUSCIELLO FEDERICO, dal 07/05/2025 00:00, al 28/05/2025 23:59 todoist-id:: 6fvgffXCPhf89H6g todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: From: ugov@univaq.it Received: 2026-02-02T13:52:34Z ✉: Web Link --- --- U-WEB La informiamo che la richiesta di autorizzazione missione num.709780, di MARTUSCIELLO FEDERICO, a Salerno, dal 07/05/2025 00:00, al 28/05/2025 23:59, descr: Periodo di scambio presso l'Università degli Studi di Salerno borsa PNRR è todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 FATE - precedente DRAMA: Nuova Metodologia e Risultati todoist-id:: 6fW295wjFjqGj5c8 todoist-project:: #✏️ PAPERS todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: https://www.overleaf.com/project/69675da0f0967462b3bd0c9d Web Link Okay, here’s a task description for the email “R: Aggiornamento Paper DRAMA: Nuova Metodologia e Risultati,” crafted with actionable steps, aiming to help someone understand and complete the task: Task Title: Finalize & Share the DRAMA Paper Update Description: This task focuses on finalizing the updated DRAMA paper and ensuring it’s presented effectively to stakeholders. It involves reviewing the document, incorporating feedback, and preparing it for distribution. Actionable Steps: 1. Review the Document: Carefully read the entire updated DRAMA paper. Pay particular attention to the section regarding [Specifically mention the key section or data point the paper focuses on - e.g., methodology, results, conclusions]. 2. Gather Feedback: Share the document with [Assignee - specify who needs to review it - e.g., Team Lead, Senior Analyst]. Actively solicit feedback on clarity, accuracy, and completeness. 3. Address Feedback: Respond to each piece of feedback received. Document all changes made based on feedback. Prioritize revisions based on the severity of the feedback. 4. Incorporate Changes: Implement the necessary revisions to ensure the document accurately reflects the updated methodology and results. 5. Draft a Summary/Executive Summary: Create a concise executive summary highlighting the key takeaways, the updated methodology, and the most significant results (approximately [Specify length – e.g., 1-2 paragraphs]). 6. Finalize & Format: Ensure the document is properly formatted, including consistent headings, tables, figures, and citations. 7. Prepare for Distribution: Choose the appropriate distribution method (e.g., email, shared drive, presentation). Consider adding a brief introductory paragraph explaining the update. 8. Proofread: Conduct a final proofread to catch any errors before final submission. Priority: Medium - This task requires focused effort and attention to detail. Due Date: [Specify a realistic deadline – e.g., End of Day Tomorrow] Notes: If you have any specific areas you’d like me to focus on during the review, please let me know. --- To help me refine this further and make it even better, could you tell me: - Who is the intended audience for this task? (e.g., Team, Management, Clients?) - What is the specific goal of the updated paper? (e.g., present a new strategy, demonstrate improved efficiency, provide data insights?) todoist-labels:: #outlook365 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Carmela Berloffa ha condiviso la cartella "PROG_DI_ATENEO_2026" con te todoist-id:: 6frj4F42mjm3cPqg todoist-project:: #☢️ Services todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: Web Link Here is the description of the task created from the provided email content: --- Task Title: Access and Review Shared Folder: PROG_DI_ATENEO_2026 Description: Carmela Berloffa has shared a folder named "PROG_DI_ATENEO_2026" with you. This task involves accessing the shared folder to confirm its availability and briefly review its contents to understand its purpose and any immediate actions required. This folder likely contains important documentation or resources related to the "University Program 2026." Origin: Email from Carmela Berloffa (Shared Folder Notification) Due Date: [Leave blank or set to ASAP if immediate action is implied by context not provided] Priority: Normal Steps to Accomplish: 1. Locate the Email Notification: Find the original email from Carmela Berloffa with the subject "Carmela Berloffa ha condiviso la cartella 'PROG_DI_ATENEO_2026' con te" (or similar shared folder notification). 2. Access the Folder: Click on the link provided within the email to open the "PROG_DI_ATENEO_2026" shared folder. 3. Verify Access: Confirm that you can successfully open and browse the contents of the folder without any permission issues. 4. Review Contents (Initial): Spend a few minutes reviewing the top-level files or subfolders to get an initial understanding of what the "PROG_DI_ATENEO_2026" project entails and your expected involvement (if any). 5. Acknowledge and Inquire (Optional but Recommended): Reply to Carmela Berloffa to confirm that you have successfully accessed the folder. If the purpose or your role regarding the folder's content isn't immediately clear, you can take this opportunity to ask for clarification. 6. Integrate (If Necessary): If this folder is critical to your ongoing work, consider adding it to your Quick Access (if using Windows File Explorer with OneDrive/SharePoint) or syncing it to your local machine for easier future access. --- todoist-labels:: #outlook365 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Patrocini Pinkamp todoist-id:: 6fv6xXxRwMPGXxHP todoist-project:: #🌸 Services-PINKAMP todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 mandare titolo ed abstract todoist-id:: 6fvr8g3pPc4wmF63 todoist-project:: #👷 WORK todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Re: About a possible EULiST application for a stay of our PhD student Zakaria Hachm in 2026 at UAQ-DISIM-SWEN Group todoist-id:: 6fWMgWwmjj3QF6Xg todoist-project:: #👷 WORK todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: Web Link Okay, here's a detailed description of the task created from the email, formatted as I would present it as an agent summarizing a task creation request. This description includes actionable items: ## Task Description: UQAM-SHM Zakharia Hachm EULiST Application Confirmation - 2026 Subject: Final Review and Action Item – EULiСТ Application for PhD Student Zakharia Hachm Purpose: Formal confirmation and necessary actions for the UQAM-SHM (Staff Headmaster’s Management, potentially referencing a student’s PhD program) to move ahead with the potential EULiSt application for Zakaria Hachm in the year 2026, with a focus on collaboration within the SWEN Group (likely signifying a strategic partnership or shared goal). Context: This task was created from an email discussing the possibility of developing an EULiSt application. A crucial step requires a final sign-off from UQAM, the managing entity, on the project’s trajectory and commitment. Actionable Tasks: 1. Client Contact & Schedule Meeting: Immediately contact the UQAM Headmaster/relevant stakeholders (specifically, the SHM team) to request a meeting to discuss the EULiСТ project in greater detail. Aim for a brief, focused initial meeting to gauge their current position on the application and ensure alignment. * Estimated Duration: 30-60 minutes * Priority: Critical - Deadline is pending further discussion with stakeholders to ensure a coordinated approach. 2. Internal Review & Data Audit (Mandatory): * Gather relevant project documents: including preliminary scope documents, budget outlines, timeline proposals, and existing partnership agreements related to the SWEN Group. * Review existing internal policies surrounding student EULiSt projects and any guidelines regarding collaboration with international partners. * Documentation Required: Document review and potential clarification is required from internal teams to ensure adherence to all applicable regulations. 3. Status Confirmation/Quasi-Approval – Urgent Action Requested: Contact the UQAM team to formally confirm whether a ‘quasi-approval’ is needed at this stage before moving into significant documentation and preparation. This confirms the project’s timeline can be executed safely by the UQAM stakeholders. Timeline: (Provide an estimated timeframe for completion – estimate 1-2 weeks) - Consider a timeline of the following: 1.1 Initial Meeting; 1.2 Content Review/Data Retrieval; 1.3 Status Confirmation Notes/Sensitivity: This is a high-priority item, representing a significant investment for both the student and UQAM's strategic planning. Ensure all communications are conducted professionally and maintain confidential information within the scope of UQAM’s data. --- Do you need me to elaborate on anything? (e.g., suggest specific meeting agendas, highlight potential questions to address during the initial briefing, add a specific weighting to the ‘Priority’ metric) todoist-labels:: #outlook365 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Nominare nuovo rappresentante studenti todoist-id:: 6fWVrV7q926WxpGh todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Calendario lezioni Area Comune CUFIS todoist-id:: 6fvm348cQ42QJJr8 todoist-project:: #👨‍🏫 Teaching todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: From: emanuela.botta@univaq.it Received: 2026-02-02T18:21:15Z ✉: Web Link --- --- Care e cari, finalmente sono arrivati i decreti attuativi e presto apriremo le iscrizioni, i tempi sono molto stretti perché il percorso dovrà chiudersi entro il 30 giugno 2026. Vi scrivo per quanto riguarda l’orario dell'area comune. Come lo scorso anno todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Richiesta variazione strutture estere mobilità e richiesta autorizzazioni - Giacomelli Stefano todoist-id:: 6fm4v9FRJ485fgv8 todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: From: stefano.giacomelli@graduate.univaq.it Received: 2026-01-13T21:06:18Z ✉: Web Link ✉: Web Link (Initial email) --- Task Description: Stefano Giacomelli, a PhD student in ICT, is requesting a change in his mandatory 6-month PNRR mobility program's host institution. He has secured a new host institution in Belgium (KU Leuven) and has obtained an official invitation letter. He is also providing supporting documents, including a letter detailing the reasons for the change, information on the new host institution, and his visiting proposal. Additionally, he is attaching authorization requests for the PhD program coordinator and will soon provide "commitment letters" from the new host institution. Recommended Actions: 1. Review and Process Host Institution Change Request: Evaluate the provided documentation for the change of host institution for Stefano Giacomelli's PNRR mobility. 2. Verify Supporting Documents: Ensure all attached documents (letter of motivation, host institution details, visiting proposal, invitation letters) are complete and accurate. 3. Obtain Commitment Letters: Follow up with Stefano Giacomelli to ensure timely submission of the "commitment letters" from the new host institution. 4. Approve Coordination Request: Review and approve the authorization requests for the PhD program coordinator. 5. Facilitate Ministry Notification: Transmit the approved request, including all necessary details of the new host institution, to the Ministry (MUR) via the CINECA platform as per the instructions. 6. Confirm U-Web Mission Request: Advise Stefano Giacomelli on the process for opening a mission request on the U-Web portal for his visiting period. 7. Provide Additional Guidance: Address any further questions Stefano Giacomelli may have regarding the administrative and bureaucratic procedures for his mobility. Deadline: - The email mentions that any variation to the initial project must be authorized by the Ministry and that this step is "very important and requires urgent action." While no specific date is given, this implies a need for prompt processing. --- Buonasera, Sono Stefano Giacomelli, dottorando DISIM ICT del XXXIX ciclo. A seguito delle informazioni ricevute mediante "Ticket - Help Point" dalla Dr.ssa Valeria Gentile, e in accordo con il mio Tutor (Prof. Fabio Graziosi) e il mio Supervisor (Prof. todoist-labels:: #followup todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-04 Fwd: Decision on your submission - JSSOFTWARE-D-25-01604 todoist-id:: 6fpXr6XWhhcQWfrc todoist-project:: #📧EmailsToAnswer todoist-due:: 2026-02-04 todoist-desc:: From: disorbo@unisannio.it Received: 2026-01-20T09:03:13Z ✉: Web Link --- Here's a summary of the email content and the corresponding actionable task: Task Summary: The email is a rejection notification from the Journal of Systems and Software (JSS) for the submission "Examining Fairness Issues in Machine Learning-based Systems" (Ref. No.: JSSOFTWARE-D-25-01604). While the paper is rejected, the editor strongly advises resubmission after addressing the reviewers' detailed comments. The reviewers highlight significant areas for improvement in the manuscript's framing of fairness, integration of related work, methodological structure and detail (especially for the qualitative analysis), dataset selection justification, and the significance and implications of the results. The resubmitted paper will be treated as a new submission. Actionable Task: Task: Revise and Resubmit Paper to Journal of Systems and Software Description: The submission "Examining Fairness Issues in Machine Learning-based Systems" (Ref. No.: JSSOFTWARE-D-25-01604) has been rejected by the Journal of Systems and Software. However, the editor encourages resubmission after addressing detailed reviewer comments. Key areas for improvement include: * Framing of Fairness: Clearly define whether fairness is treated as a technical, socio-technical, or hybrid concern. * Related Work: Synthesize the literature into a coherent argument rather than an enumerative survey. * Methodology: * Present a unified methodological structure with clear workflows and transitions between phases. * Provide more detailed explanations for the qualitative coding process, including iteration, rater interaction, and reliance on LLM summaries. * Clarify the sequencing of methodological steps and ensure logical dependencies. * Justify dataset selection criteria and report exclusion numbers. * Ensure consistency between research questions and the role of LLMs. * Consider extending the dataset size if feasible through pre-screening. * Results and Discussion: * Explicitly discuss novel vs. incremental findings and align with previous empirical work. * Provide concrete examples of implications for practitioners. * Consider adding new research questions and discussions. * Clarify the rationale for using large language models. * Overall Cohesion: Improve the integration and cohesion across different methods employed in the study. Recommended Actions: 1. Thoroughly read and understand all reviewer comments. 2. Develop a detailed plan to address each comment. Categorize comments by theme (e.g., Introduction, Methodology, Results, Discussion) to facilitate systematic revision. 3. Rewrite sections of the manuscript based on the reviewer feedback, focusing on the identified weaknesses. 4. Prepare a comprehensive response letter detailing how each reviewer comment has been addressed. 5. Ensure the resubmitted manuscript is treated as a NEW submission but consider disclosing the original submission information and reference number. 6. Consult empirical research guidelines (e.g., Paul Ralph et al. 2020) for structuring the revised manuscript and methodology. 7. Consider creating a methodological diagram to clarify the workflow. No Deadline: The email does not specify a deadline for resubmission. --- Buongiorno a tutti, vi giro la mail ricevuta da JSS. Saluti, Andrea ---------- Forwarded message --------- Da: Journal of Systems and Software em@editorialmanager.com Date: lun 19 gen 2026 alle ore 10:59 Subject: Decision on your submission todoist-status:: ◼️