logseq/pages/todoist___2026-02-02.md

• 2026-02-02 oscurante fuori todoist-id:: 6cq47V2RFqCM2fJg todoist-project:: #🧓🏻 DIY todoist-due:: 2026-02-02 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-02 Ricordare di definire il progetto di Minase non inviate come allegato del collegio di ottobre 2025 todoist-id:: 6fFc5HhX3CrJ7QX9 todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT todoist-due:: 2026-02-02 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-02 Modulo valutazione tesi di dottorato todoist-id:: 6fJGc7fq6XmGWrMg todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT todoist-due:: 2026-02-02 todoist-desc:: From: vittorio.cortellessa@univaq.it Received: 2025-11-19T10:25:22Z ✉: Web Link --- The email is written in Italian and contains the following sentences: * "Siccome lo sto facendo per Napoli, una cosa del genere non mi sembra male" (Literally translated to English as "Since I'm doing it for Naples, something of this kind doesn't seem bad to me") * "da adottare anche per i nostri reviewers esterni, che dici?" (Literally translated to English as "to adopt also for our external reviewers, what do you think?") * "Ciao, Vic" (Literally translated to English as "Hi, Vic") * "
  " (A break tag) * "Vittorio Cortellessa, Ph.D." (The sender's name and title) * "DISIM - Universita' dell'Aquila" (The sender's institution) * "Via Vetoio, 1 - Coppito" (The sender's address) * "67010 L'Aquila, Italy" (The sender's location) * "(+39) 0862-433165" (The sender's phone number) * "vittorio.cortellessa@univaq.it" (The sender's email address) * "https://www.disim.univaq.it/VittorioCortellessa/261" (The sender's website link) Based on the content of the email, it appears to be a professional communication written in Italian, possibly for work-related purposes. --- Siccome lo sto facendo per Napoli, una cosa del genere non mi sembra male da adottare anche per i nostri reviewers esterni, che dici? Ciao, Vic --------------------------------------- Vittorio Cortellessa, Ph.D. DISIM - Universita' dell'Aqui todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-02 Acquisto CASA Pescara todoist-id:: 6cW7QqW6CpR2XfMF todoist-project:: #📗 Personal todoist-due:: 2026-02-02 todoist-labels:: #goal #logseqed todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-02 Pensare alla questione gestione Reference Group 2.2 todoist-id:: 6fhqXvj7Mj8hXmM9 todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT todoist-due:: 2026-02-02 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-02 🧠​​ Review and Complete Paper Assignments for EASE 2026 Research Papers Track todoist-id:: 6frFf4WCxMV283m6 todoist-project:: #📜 REVIEWS todoist-due:: 2026-02-02 todoist-desc:: Subject: [EASE 2026] Research Papers Track Paper Assignment Sender: ease2026@easychair.org Weblink: Outlook Summary: You are assigned to review 226 research papers for EASE 2026, with an expected load of 5-6 papers each. Access the submissions via EasyChair for EASE 2026. Main Instructions: - Provide positive and constructive reviews focusing on novelty, significance, soundness, verifiability, transparency, and presentation. - Follow the IEEE Code of Conduct and optionally refer to the Empirical Standards Checklist. - Use the scoring system: strong accept, accept, weak accept, weak reject, reject. Lead Reviewer Responsibilities (if designated): - Initiate and drive the discussion to reach consensus. - Check reviews for issues and request changes. - Write a meta-review summarizing discussion and rationale without revealing reviewer identities. Deadlines (AoE): - Paper assignment: January 27th - Reviews due: February 26th - Online discussion and meta-review: February 27th – March 10th - Notification date: March 13th Assigned Papers: - (46) A framework for Evaluating Bias in LLM-Generated Code - (62) A Universal Textual Merge Strategy Based on Tokens for Version Control Systems - (108) STLGT: A Scalable Trace-Based Linear Graph Transformer for Tail Latency Prediction in Microservices - (118) Sustainability of Open Source Machine Learning Robustness Assessment Tools: A Repository Mining Study - (184) Exploring Creativity in Human–Human-LLM Collaborative Software Design Subtasks: 1. Log in to EasyChair and access assigned submissions. (Due: Jan 27) 2. Review each assigned paper with positivity and constructiveness. 3. Use the scoring system to rate papers. 4. If lead reviewer, drive discussions, check reviews, and write meta-reviews. (Discussion phase: Feb 27 - Mar 10) 5. Submit all reviews by February 26. 6. Participate in online discussions and submit meta-review if applicable between February 27 and March 10. 7. Await notification on March 13. Please ensure to keep all reviews respectful and support your evaluations thoroughly. Contact program chairs Silvia Abrahão and Xin Xia for any questions. todoist-labels:: #ai-generated-main-task todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-02 Contattare studenti restituzione portatili todoist-id:: 6f82x4WFg69Jmr99 todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT todoist-due:: 2026-02-02 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-02 Manuscript in your Reviewer Center - IEEE Software, SWSI-2026-01-0024 todoist-id:: 6fjh74qpCPV5HJ38 todoist-project:: #📜 REVIEWS todoist-due:: 2026-02-02 todoist-desc:: From: onbehalfof@manuscriptcentral.com Received: 2026-01-12T07:28:14Z ✉: Web Link --- Okay, here’s a synthesis of the email content, transforming it into actionable tasks for completing the task of reviewing the manuscript. I’ve focused on clarity and providing specific steps. Task Summary: Review the IEEE Software manuscript ("SWSI-2026-01-0024") for adherence to peer review guidelines, focusing on confidentiality and providing substantive feedback. Actionable Tasks & Breakdown: 1. Review Policies Understanding (Priority: High): * Action: Thoroughly read the reviewer policies document (link: [https://magazines.ieeeauthorcenter.ieee.org/submit-your-article-for-peer-review/about-the-peer-review-process]) to understand the specific requirements for content, format, and communication. Pay close attention to the emphasis on confidentiality regarding AI-generated feedback. * Deliverable: A concise summary of key policy points – particularly concerning what constitutes acceptable or unacceptable review comments. 2. Manuscript Review & Initial Assessment (Priority: High): * Action: Begin reviewing the manuscript – specifically focusing on the sections related to the agentic system engineering context. Identify key sections: * Abstract: Ensure it accurately summarizes the manuscript's purpose and scope. * Introduction: Evaluate the relevance of the context engineering concept to the manuscript’s topic. * Methodology: Assess the methods used – are they appropriate for the context? * Results & Discussion: Confirm the results are logically supported by the methods. * Conclusion: Assess the final conclusion – is it justified and well-supported? * Deliverable: A brief (1-2 paragraph) summary of initial impressions, highlighting potential areas of concern (e.g., a lack of specific details, unclear methodology). 3. Identify Key Concerns - Confidentiality & AI Feedback (Priority: Medium): * Action: Specifically look for the sections where the reviewer emphasizes caution regarding sharing information about the manuscript with AI platforms for text generation. * Deliverable: A list of 2-3 specific concerns regarding the manuscript's use of AI-generated content, which you will need to address in your review. 4. Content Review & Feedback (Priority: High): * Action: Address the following points based on your concerns: * Referencing: Ensure all citations are accurate and properly formatted. * Specificity: Ensure claims are supported by evidence. * Context: Clarify the agentic system engineering context. Does it adequately demonstrate its significance? * AI Integration: Carefully assess the role and influence of AI. Does it feel like a supplementary tool or integral to the core work? (The reviewer’s concern about shared information is key here.) * Deliverable: Draft review comments addressing each identified concern, focusing on providing specific, constructive feedback. (Focus on the why behind your comments – not just stating the problem.) 5. Review Score Sheet & Submission (Priority: Medium): * Action: Carefully and accurately fill out the review score sheet, ensuring all sections are completed (Confidential Comments, Public Comments, and any other required fields). * Deliverable: Completed review score sheet, with all required fields filled. 6. Communication Protocol (Priority: Medium): * Action: Respond promptly to any questions from the editor or reviewer. Be professional and courteous. * Deliverable: A record of your communication attempts – noting the date, content, and outcome of each communication. 7. Final Review & Submission (Priority: Low): Once you've completed all steps, submit the manuscript for review. Important Note: Document everything – your reasoning behind the feedback, specific examples, and any changes made during the review process. This will provide a clear audit trail for future review decisions. --- Let me know if you'd like me to elaborate on any of these tasks or provide more specific examples! --- IEEE Software, SWSI-2026-01-0024 manuscript type: SWSI: Agentic System Engineering (Sep/Oct 2026) "Context Engineering for Software Engineering Agents" 12-Jan-2026 Dear Prof. Di Ruscio: Thank you for agreeing to review the above reference manus todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-02 Richiesta variazione strutture estere mobilità e richiesta autorizzazioni - Giacomelli Stefano todoist-id:: 6fm4v9FRJ485fgv8 todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT todoist-due:: 2026-02-02 todoist-desc:: From: stefano.giacomelli@graduate.univaq.it Received: 2026-01-13T21:06:18Z ✉: Web Link ✉: Web Link (Initial email) --- Task Description: Stefano Giacomelli, a PhD student in ICT, is requesting a change in his mandatory 6-month PNRR mobility program's host institution. He has secured a new host institution in Belgium (KU Leuven) and has obtained an official invitation letter. He is also providing supporting documents, including a letter detailing the reasons for the change, information on the new host institution, and his visiting proposal. Additionally, he is attaching authorization requests for the PhD program coordinator and will soon provide "commitment letters" from the new host institution. Recommended Actions: 1. Review and Process Host Institution Change Request: Evaluate the provided documentation for the change of host institution for Stefano Giacomelli's PNRR mobility. 2. Verify Supporting Documents: Ensure all attached documents (letter of motivation, host institution details, visiting proposal, invitation letters) are complete and accurate. 3. Obtain Commitment Letters: Follow up with Stefano Giacomelli to ensure timely submission of the "commitment letters" from the new host institution. 4. Approve Coordination Request: Review and approve the authorization requests for the PhD program coordinator. 5. Facilitate Ministry Notification: Transmit the approved request, including all necessary details of the new host institution, to the Ministry (MUR) via the CINECA platform as per the instructions. 6. Confirm U-Web Mission Request: Advise Stefano Giacomelli on the process for opening a mission request on the U-Web portal for his visiting period. 7. Provide Additional Guidance: Address any further questions Stefano Giacomelli may have regarding the administrative and bureaucratic procedures for his mobility. Deadline: - The email mentions that any variation to the initial project must be authorized by the Ministry and that this step is "very important and requires urgent action." While no specific date is given, this implies a need for prompt processing. --- Buonasera, Sono Stefano Giacomelli, dottorando DISIM ICT del XXXIX ciclo. A seguito delle informazioni ricevute mediante "Ticket - Help Point" dalla Dr.ssa Valeria Gentile, e in accordo con il mio Tutor (Prof. Fabio Graziosi) e il mio Supervisor (Prof. todoist-labels:: #followup todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-02 Deliverable D3.2 todoist-id:: 6fVRXMVJWRWQ2fgG todoist-project:: #🚀 Projects-EU-MOSAICO todoist-due:: 2026-02-02 todoist-desc:: MOSAICO D3.2 - Online LaTeX Editor Overleaf todoist-labels:: #goal #logseqed todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-02 [Dottorato PNRR] Relazione annuale di sintesi todoist-id:: 6fj3mhqW972xv5c8 todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT todoist-due:: 2026-02-02 todoist-desc:: From: alessandra.galassi@graduate.univaq.it Received: 2026-01-09T11:04:30Z ✉: Web Link --- Okay, here’s a synthesized summary of the email, broken down into actionable tasks, based on the content: Task Summary: The email is a formal message from a "Chiar.mo Coordinatore del corso dottorale in ICT prof. Di Ruscio" (Coordination Officer for the PhD in ICT Professor Di Ruscio) to the recipient. The recipient is being sent a completed and signed form outlining a course. Actionable Tasks: 1. Review and Confirm Completeness: Carefully read the completed and signed form to ensure all required information is accurately present. 2. Attach the Form: Attach the completed form to this email. 3. Send the Form: Send the attached form to the recipient. 4. Express Good Wishes: Compose a polite and cordial message to the recipient, wishing them a happy New Year. 5. Verify Sender Information: Ensure the email is sent from a valid and trusted source. Let me know if you'd like me to elaborate on any of these points or add more detail! --- Chiar.mo Coordinatore del corso dottorale in ICT prof. Di Ruscio, come da guida utente, in allegato, invio compilata e firmata quanto specificato in oggetto. Grazie. L’occasione è gradita per porgere i migliori auguri di buon anno! Un saluto cordiale, todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-02-02 Organizzare Worskhop su AI / Agenti / Edge interagendo con SImone Gianfranceschi di Intecs todoist-id:: 6fQcCRJxh5pvMgrg todoist-project:: #📻​ Services-RadioLabs todoist-due:: 2026-02-02 todoist-desc:: Link to Logseq todoist-labels:: #source_logseq todoist-status:: ◼️