Files
logseq/journals/2024_01_18.md
T
2025-06-02 17:15:13 +02:00

6.8 KiB

  •  Notes

  • 🤝Meetings

    • CROSSMINER GROUP MEETING collapsed:: true
      • type:: meeting people:: people/crossminer date:: 18-01-2024 - 17:41 duration::
        • Work Proposal 1 collapsed:: true
          • image.png
          • image.png
          • image.png
          • image.png
          • image.png
          • Ideas
            • image.png
            • image.png
            • image.png
            • image.png
              • Results obtained with cross-validation.
              • Using readme file to predict only one tag
                • The dataset is like this, only one tag is assigned to each labeled model
            • image.png
              • We are missing the GitHub link.
        • Work Proposal 2 - Automate scientific workflows
          • image.png
          • image.png
          • image.png
          • Ideas
            • image.png
            • image.png
            • image.png
              • We need to characterize the source code. The idea was to consider Jupyter notebook in a speculative way instead of Orange models that are limited in size.
              • We need to characterize Jupyper notebook to do so. WE decided to rely on an existing work that classify Jupyter notebooks. So we could focus on those that implement data pipelines / workflows so that we can train a recommender for data pipelines / workflows.
            • image.png
            • image.png
            • image.png{:height 312, :width 1360}
    • MOSAICO meeting type:: meeting external-links:: tags:: PROJECTS/MOSAICO people:: date:: 18-01-2024 - 9:00 duration:: 100 collapsed:: true
      • Agenda

        • Introduction partners
          • DONE @ all: could you please all prepare a presentation of 5 minutes describing your institution and your expertises. background-color:: green
        • Concept presentation: 5 minutes. --> Massimo presentation of the concept.
        • Key specific objectif vs SOTA vs WP introduction and challenges for each of the 4 building blocks composing the MOSAICO platform:
          • @YORK: may I ask you to present KSO 1 + SOTA related to communication protocol between AI agents in SE tasks + WP1 and possible tasks division --> 10 minutes
          • DONE @UDA: may I ask you to present KSO 2 + SOTA related to management of agents communities for SE tasks + WP2 and possible tasks division --> 10 minutes background-color:: green
          • @IMT Massimo: may I ask you to present KSO 3 + SOTA related to coordination and collaboration of agents in SE tasks + WP3 and possible tasks division --> 10 minutes
          • @LIST Jordi: may I ask you to present KSO 4 + SOTA related to governance in SE tasks + WP4 and possible tasks division --> 10 minutes
            • BESSER collapsed:: true
              • image.png{:height 411, :width 709}
              • image.png{:height 383, :width 712}
        • Contribution of INTRASOFT and ECLIPSE into the project
          • @John and ECL partners, please prepare suggestions.
        • Discussion about use cases
          • Immersion: feedback
          • UDA/ Davide, any feedback on your side ?
          • INTRASOFT, any end users ?
    • Thesis of Moamin collapsed:: true
      • type:: meeting external-links::
        tags:: SERVICES/PHDICT people:: date:: 18-01-2024 - 14:54 duration::
      • Data quality

      • image.png
      • image.png
        • How DataNode overlap with deployment components
        • WHat are the aspects of novelty of this metamodel
      • image.png
        • What's the need for this compared with workflow languages of process based languages like BPMN?
      • Data pipeline language question
        • What's the novelty with respect to
          • Apache NIFI
          • Orange
          • ML workflow technologies
      • image.png
      • image.png
      • image.png
      • image.png
        • What's the novelty of this?
      • Data Quality management
        • image.png
        • image.png
        • image.png
        • image.png
          • Data quality #question
            • Is it possible to add new data dimensions
            • How have you elicited the quality dimensions?
            • How to define quality, which can be based on a very subjective definitions
        • image.png
        • image.png
          • It is not clear what are the research questions you wanted to answer with this evaluation question
        • image.png
        • image.png
          • To appreciate the results it is necessary to understand the research questions
        • image.png
        • image.png
        • image.png
      • What kind of data you can support
      • Is you tool able to generate tool or it's just a graphical interface
      • Why are you considering GPS in you data model
      • What are your future plans?
        • WHat are the things that you did not manage to cover during your study and that you think you want to keep working
      • If you would to teach, would you like to have a dedicated course on this or part of an existing course like software architecture
    • {{query (and <%current page%> (property :type "meeting") (not <%current page%>))}}
  • 📜Reviews

    • {{query (and REVIEWS (or (property :date-end <%today%>) (property :date-start <%today%>) (property :date-submitted <%today%>)))}} query-table:: true query-properties:: [:file :year :venue :deadline]
  • ⤴️Omnivore readings

    • {{query (and (property :source Omnivore) (or (property :deadline <%today%>) (property :date-saved <%today%>) (property :date-archived <%today%>)))}} query-table:: true query-properties:: [:labels :state :full-title]