logseq/pages/todoist___2026-01-28.md

• 2026-01-28 TOOL DEMO TRACK - MODELS 2026 Organizing Committee todoist-id:: 6fQ7HCGxPvcHGHgg todoist-project:: #💺 EditoringChairing todoist-due:: 2026-01-28 todoist-desc:: From: lolaburgueno@uma.es todoist-labels:: #goal #logseqed todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-01-28 Contattare studenti restituzione portatili todoist-id:: 6f82x4WFg69Jmr99 todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT todoist-due:: 2026-01-28 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-01-28 R: Info PhD visiting period - GIACOMELLI todoist-id:: 6fhmvW5wJxpXpfc8 todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT todoist-due:: 2026-01-28 todoist-desc:: From: stefano.giacomelli@graduate.univaq.it Received: 2026-01-08T09:49:43Z ✉: Web Link --- Okay, let's break down this request and create a detailed, actionable plan. This task involves presenting a proposal to the university regarding a short-term visiting researcher to explore a specific aspect of your research. Here's a breakdown of what needs to be done, with actionable steps and considerations: 1. Understanding the Core Request: The request is to formally request a visiting researcher to explore [Specify the topic here - crucial for tailoring the plan]. This is a high-level request that requires a detailed proposal to justify the investment and ensure it aligns with university guidelines and expectations. 2. Key Action Steps - A Breakdown: * Phase 1: Preliminary Research & Justification (1-2 weeks) * Define the Scope: Precisely define what aspects of the topic you’ll be exploring. Don't just say “explore a topic.” What specific questions or problems do you want to address? * Literature Review: Conduct a preliminary review of existing research related to the topic. This will help you understand current trends, challenges, and potential gaps in knowledge. * Identify Target Audience: Who is this visitor expected to interact with? (Researchers, students, administrators?). This will influence the presentation. * Budget Estimation: Develop a preliminary budget outline – think about travel, accommodation, research expenses, communication, and potential costs associated with the visitor’s work. * University Guidelines: Crucially, Review the university's policies regarding visiting researcher requests, including timelines, required documentation, and approval processes. Find out what they expect in terms of: * Purpose of the Visit: Is it exploratory, data gathering, mentorship, etc.? * Length of Stay: How long will the visitor be based on campus? * Data Management: Will the visitor need access to your datasets? * Intellectual Property: Clarify ownership of any work produced during the visit. * Phase 2: Proposal Development (2-4 weeks) * Draft a Proposal Outline: Create a structured proposal that includes: * Executive Summary: A concise overview of the project and its importance. * Introduction & Background: Contextualize the topic, explaining why it’s relevant to your research. * Research Objectives: Clearly state what you want to achieve. Make them SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound). * Methodology: Describe how you’ll conduct the research – what data will you collect, which methods will you use (literature review, interviews, surveys, data analysis)? * Timeline & Milestones: A Gantt chart or table showing the planned phases and expected completion dates. * Resources Required: List required equipment, software, and access to datasets/databases. * Budget Breakdown: Detailed breakdown of anticipated costs. * Potential Benefits: Explain how the visit will contribute to your research or university’s goals. * Risk Assessment: Identify potential challenges and mitigation strategies. * Write the Full Proposal: Follow a professional writing style. Ensure clarity, accuracy, and thoroughness. * Phase 3: Formal Submission & Approval (1-2 weeks) * Submit to the Appropriate Department/Committee: Follow the university’s procedures for submitting proposal requests (e.g., research office, department head). * Submit to the University Review Board (if applicable): Some universities require this step. * Seek Feedback: If possible, ask colleagues for feedback on the proposal before submitting it. 3. Specific Considerations for your Topic: * Data Availability: Is there a readily available dataset that the visitor can use? * Accessibility: Can you provide access to relevant documents, software, or databases? * Researcher's Expertise: Does the visitor have expertise related to this topic that could benefit your research? 4. Recommended Next Steps – Actionable Tasks: 1. Schedule a Meeting with [Your Supervisor/Research Team Lead]: Discuss the project scope, budget, and timeline. 2. Research University Guidelines: Thoroughly review the university’s policy on visiting researcher requests. 3. Identify Key Stakeholders: Talk with those involved who will be affected by this visit (e.g., Data Science department, research lab). 4. Start initial literature review. To help me refine this further, could you tell me: * What is the specific topic you're proposing to explore? (e.g., "Sentiment analysis of social media data related to climate change," or "Exploring the impact of a specific intervention on student learning.") * What is the proposed duration of the visit? (e.g., 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month) * Are there any specific data sources or resources that you'd like to emphasize? --- Buongiorno professore (e buon anno), Le scrivo come richiesto da lei, per ricordarle di inviare l'autorizzazione al settore dottorati, per il mio visiting (dal 1 Marzo al 31 Maggio 2026, al KU di Leuven). Ho già formalizzato tutte le pratiche con il KU todoist-labels:: #followup todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-01-28 Manuscript in your Reviewer Center - IEEE Software, SWSI-2026-01-0024 todoist-id:: 6fjh74qpCPV5HJ38 todoist-project:: #📜 REVIEWS todoist-due:: 2026-01-28 todoist-desc:: From: onbehalfof@manuscriptcentral.com Received: 2026-01-12T07:28:14Z ✉: Web Link --- Okay, here’s a synthesis of the email content, transforming it into actionable tasks for completing the task of reviewing the manuscript. I’ve focused on clarity and providing specific steps. Task Summary: Review the IEEE Software manuscript ("SWSI-2026-01-0024") for adherence to peer review guidelines, focusing on confidentiality and providing substantive feedback. Actionable Tasks & Breakdown: 1. Review Policies Understanding (Priority: High): * Action: Thoroughly read the reviewer policies document (link: [https://magazines.ieeeauthorcenter.ieee.org/submit-your-article-for-peer-review/about-the-peer-review-process]) to understand the specific requirements for content, format, and communication. Pay close attention to the emphasis on confidentiality regarding AI-generated feedback. * Deliverable: A concise summary of key policy points – particularly concerning what constitutes acceptable or unacceptable review comments. 2. Manuscript Review & Initial Assessment (Priority: High): * Action: Begin reviewing the manuscript – specifically focusing on the sections related to the agentic system engineering context. Identify key sections: * Abstract: Ensure it accurately summarizes the manuscript's purpose and scope. * Introduction: Evaluate the relevance of the context engineering concept to the manuscript’s topic. * Methodology: Assess the methods used – are they appropriate for the context? * Results & Discussion: Confirm the results are logically supported by the methods. * Conclusion: Assess the final conclusion – is it justified and well-supported? * Deliverable: A brief (1-2 paragraph) summary of initial impressions, highlighting potential areas of concern (e.g., a lack of specific details, unclear methodology). 3. Identify Key Concerns - Confidentiality & AI Feedback (Priority: Medium): * Action: Specifically look for the sections where the reviewer emphasizes caution regarding sharing information about the manuscript with AI platforms for text generation. * Deliverable: A list of 2-3 specific concerns regarding the manuscript's use of AI-generated content, which you will need to address in your review. 4. Content Review & Feedback (Priority: High): * Action: Address the following points based on your concerns: * Referencing: Ensure all citations are accurate and properly formatted. * Specificity: Ensure claims are supported by evidence. * Context: Clarify the agentic system engineering context. Does it adequately demonstrate its significance? * AI Integration: Carefully assess the role and influence of AI. Does it feel like a supplementary tool or integral to the core work? (The reviewer’s concern about shared information is key here.) * Deliverable: Draft review comments addressing each identified concern, focusing on providing specific, constructive feedback. (Focus on the why behind your comments – not just stating the problem.) 5. Review Score Sheet & Submission (Priority: Medium): * Action: Carefully and accurately fill out the review score sheet, ensuring all sections are completed (Confidential Comments, Public Comments, and any other required fields). * Deliverable: Completed review score sheet, with all required fields filled. 6. Communication Protocol (Priority: Medium): * Action: Respond promptly to any questions from the editor or reviewer. Be professional and courteous. * Deliverable: A record of your communication attempts – noting the date, content, and outcome of each communication. 7. Final Review & Submission (Priority: Low): Once you've completed all steps, submit the manuscript for review. Important Note: Document everything – your reasoning behind the feedback, specific examples, and any changes made during the review process. This will provide a clear audit trail for future review decisions. --- Let me know if you'd like me to elaborate on any of these tasks or provide more specific examples! --- IEEE Software, SWSI-2026-01-0024 manuscript type: SWSI: Agentic System Engineering (Sep/Oct 2026) "Context Engineering for Software Engineering Agents" 12-Jan-2026 Dear Prof. Di Ruscio: Thank you for agreeing to review the above reference manus todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-01-28 OpenCode | The open source AI coding agent todoist-id:: 6fpPgGfgM48RfhHg todoist-project:: #Inbox todoist-due:: 2026-01-28 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-01-28 PAPERS/J-Collaborative-Development todoist-id:: 6fmMjW88FQ9m8x2g todoist-project:: #✏️ PAPERS todoist-due:: 2026-01-28 todoist-desc:: WebLink: Outlook todoist-labels:: #goal #logseqed todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-01-28 Pubblicazione Decreto di rettifica dell'Avviso per la presentazione di Progetti di Ateneo per la Ricerca di Base e Avvio alla Ricerca per l'anno 2026 todoist-id:: 6ffgFx5M2VMWVhQ8 todoist-project:: #🔭 Services-Commissione-Ricerca-DISIM todoist-due:: 2026-01-28 todoist-desc:: From: proget@strutture.univaq.it Received: 2025-12-22T14:22:50Z ✉: Web Link --- Okay, here's a synthesis of the email content, summarized and designed to be actionable, focusing on the key information and suggesting steps: Task Summary: The email is a formal announcement regarding the completion of a project proposal ("Avviso per la presentazione di Progetti..."). It's requesting confirmation of receipt and potentially a preliminary review. Detailed Breakdown & Actionable Steps: 1. Confirmation of Receipt: Immediately confirm you’ve received the email. If you haven’t, contact the sender (Luisa De Matteis) via email. 2. Understand the Content: The email highlights the crucial point that the project proposal ("Progetti di Ateneo") has been published and is awaiting review. The key elements are: * Official Publication: It was published at the Albo ufficiale di Ateneo. * Ricerca - Finanziamenti di Ateneo: It is related to funding and research initiatives within the Ateneo University. * Due Diligence Required: It's essential to review the proposal thoroughly. 3. Recommended Actions - Initial Review & Contact: * Review the Proposal: Carefully read the entire document. Understand the scope, goals, and deliverables. * Contact the Sender (Luisa De Matteis): Send a polite email requesting a brief overview of the proposal. Specifically state your intention to review it and any initial questions you have. Ask for a preliminary assessment of the document’s completeness and relevance to your team. 4. Specific Questions to Ask (Based on the Email's Context - these are crucial): * What is the stated purpose/goal of the project? * What specific areas require the most attention during the review? * Are there any attachments or supplementary materials that are needed? 5. Legal Compliance & Disclaimers: Before proceeding, review the email for the disclaimer concerning data privacy. Ensure your actions comply with all relevant legal requirements regarding the handling of sensitive project information. 6. Documentation: Keep a record of your communication with Luisa De Matteis and the email itself. --- To help me refine this further and tailor it to a specific scenario, could you tell me: * What is the role of the recipient? (e.g., Project Manager, Researcher, Legal Counsel?) * What is the project being reviewed? (A general idea is helpful.) --- Gentilissime e gentilissimi, vi inoltriamo il Decreto di rettifica dell'Avviso per la presentazione di Progetti di Ateneo per la Ricerca di Base e Avvio alla Ricerca per l'anno 2026. Il presente documento è stato pubblicato all'Albo ufficiale di Ateneo todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-01-28 Re: Rinnovo Assegni di Ricerca e Nuovi Incarichi di Ricerca su fondi di Ateneo 2026 todoist-id:: 6fphgQWXJxgq2Qp8 todoist-project:: #🏢 Admin todoist-due:: 2026-01-28 todoist-desc:: From: donatella.donatelli@univaq.it Received: 2026-01-20T20:59:52Z ✉: Web Link --- --- Caro Davide, per quanto riguarda la tempistica sui fondi RIA mi sono tenuta prudenzialmente un po’ larga nei tempi considerando che i bandi potrebbero essere tanti e non tutti i colleghi sono efficienti nell’inviare la documentazione alla segreteria. todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-01-28 Deliverable D3.2 todoist-id:: 6fVRXMVJWRWQ2fgG todoist-project:: #🚀 Projects-EU-MOSAICO todoist-due:: 2026-01-28 todoist-desc:: MOSAICO D3.2 - Online LaTeX Editor Overleaf todoist-labels:: #goal #logseqed todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-01-28 MOSAICO GA: Preparation of partners' mini-interviews todoist-id:: 6fmRFRjqR84GqhF8 todoist-project:: #🚀 Projects-EU-MOSAICO todoist-due:: 2026-01-28 todoist-desc:: WebLink: Outlook Email Content Summary: The partners will be together in Athens on January 29 to film short "mini-interviews" for the project’s communication. Videos will focus on three key questions showcasing the diversity of the consortium. Recording will take place on-site on January 28 and 29, with additional online recordings afterward via video call. The spokesperson for each organization needs to be identified. A GDPR consent form will be shared by the beginning of next week for signing. The questions cover Innovation, Collaboration, and Vision. Subtasks: 1. Schedule on-site video recordings on January 28 and 29. 2. Reach out to partners to identify spokespersons for the mini-interviews. 3. Prepare a calendar for the video recordings (to be shared next week). 4. Plan online video recording sessions after on-site recordings. 5. Share GDPR consent form for signing by the beginning of next week. 6. Remind partners to avoid technical jargon and start sentences by rephrasing the questions for easier editing. 7. Prepare for filming the mini-interviews during breaks at the Athens meeting. Due Date: January 29, 2024 todoist-labels:: #ai-generated #ai-generated-main-task todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-01-28 Dottorato di Ricerca - Nuove proposte e rinnovi - XLII ciclo - a.a.2026/2027. todoist-id:: 6fq4jcrv89PW5c78 todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT todoist-due:: 2026-01-28 todoist-desc:: From: dot@strutture.univaq.it Received: 2026-01-22T09:36:00Z ✉: Web Link --- The email transmits a note with protocol number 10497 dated January 22, 2026, regarding a specific subject. Task: Forward note prot. n. 10497 of 22/01/2026. Recommended Actions: * Access the email content and locate the attached or referenced note. * Forward the note to the relevant individuals or departments. * Ensure proper documentation or logging of the forwarding action, if required. Deadline: January 22, 2026. --- Trasmettiamo la nota prot. n. 10497 del 22/01/2026 relativa all'oggetto.. Cordiali saluti Simonetta Ricciardi Università degli Studi dell'Aquila Settore Dottorati, Assegni e Borse di Ricerca Palazzo Camponeschi Piazza Santa Margherita, 2 Te todoist-status:: ◼️