logseq/pages/todoist___2026-01-23.md

• 2026-01-23 Manuscript in your Reviewer Center - IEEE Software, SWSI-2026-01-0024 todoist-id:: 6fjh74qpCPV5HJ38 todoist-project:: #📜 REVIEWS todoist-due:: 2026-01-23 todoist-desc:: From: onbehalfof@manuscriptcentral.com Received: 2026-01-12T07:28:14Z ✉: Web Link --- Okay, here’s a synthesis of the email content, transforming it into actionable tasks for completing the task of reviewing the manuscript. I’ve focused on clarity and providing specific steps. Task Summary: Review the IEEE Software manuscript ("SWSI-2026-01-0024") for adherence to peer review guidelines, focusing on confidentiality and providing substantive feedback. Actionable Tasks & Breakdown: 1. Review Policies Understanding (Priority: High): * Action: Thoroughly read the reviewer policies document (link: [https://magazines.ieeeauthorcenter.ieee.org/submit-your-article-for-peer-review/about-the-peer-review-process]) to understand the specific requirements for content, format, and communication. Pay close attention to the emphasis on confidentiality regarding AI-generated feedback. * Deliverable: A concise summary of key policy points – particularly concerning what constitutes acceptable or unacceptable review comments. 2. Manuscript Review & Initial Assessment (Priority: High): * Action: Begin reviewing the manuscript – specifically focusing on the sections related to the agentic system engineering context. Identify key sections: * Abstract: Ensure it accurately summarizes the manuscript's purpose and scope. * Introduction: Evaluate the relevance of the context engineering concept to the manuscript’s topic. * Methodology: Assess the methods used – are they appropriate for the context? * Results & Discussion: Confirm the results are logically supported by the methods. * Conclusion: Assess the final conclusion – is it justified and well-supported? * Deliverable: A brief (1-2 paragraph) summary of initial impressions, highlighting potential areas of concern (e.g., a lack of specific details, unclear methodology). 3. Identify Key Concerns - Confidentiality & AI Feedback (Priority: Medium): * Action: Specifically look for the sections where the reviewer emphasizes caution regarding sharing information about the manuscript with AI platforms for text generation. * Deliverable: A list of 2-3 specific concerns regarding the manuscript's use of AI-generated content, which you will need to address in your review. 4. Content Review & Feedback (Priority: High): * Action: Address the following points based on your concerns: * Referencing: Ensure all citations are accurate and properly formatted. * Specificity: Ensure claims are supported by evidence. * Context: Clarify the agentic system engineering context. Does it adequately demonstrate its significance? * AI Integration: Carefully assess the role and influence of AI. Does it feel like a supplementary tool or integral to the core work? (The reviewer’s concern about shared information is key here.) * Deliverable: Draft review comments addressing each identified concern, focusing on providing specific, constructive feedback. (Focus on the why behind your comments – not just stating the problem.) 5. Review Score Sheet & Submission (Priority: Medium): * Action: Carefully and accurately fill out the review score sheet, ensuring all sections are completed (Confidential Comments, Public Comments, and any other required fields). * Deliverable: Completed review score sheet, with all required fields filled. 6. Communication Protocol (Priority: Medium): * Action: Respond promptly to any questions from the editor or reviewer. Be professional and courteous. * Deliverable: A record of your communication attempts – noting the date, content, and outcome of each communication. 7. Final Review & Submission (Priority: Low): Once you've completed all steps, submit the manuscript for review. Important Note: Document everything – your reasoning behind the feedback, specific examples, and any changes made during the review process. This will provide a clear audit trail for future review decisions. --- Let me know if you'd like me to elaborate on any of these tasks or provide more specific examples! --- IEEE Software, SWSI-2026-01-0024 manuscript type: SWSI: Agentic System Engineering (Sep/Oct 2026) "Context Engineering for Software Engineering Agents" 12-Jan-2026 Dear Prof. Di Ruscio: Thank you for agreeing to review the above reference manus todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-01-23 Modulo valutazione tesi di dottorato todoist-id:: 6fJGc7fq6XmGWrMg todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT todoist-due:: 2026-01-23 todoist-desc:: From: vittorio.cortellessa@univaq.it Received: 2025-11-19T10:25:22Z ✉: Web Link --- The email is written in Italian and contains the following sentences: * "Siccome lo sto facendo per Napoli, una cosa del genere non mi sembra male" (Literally translated to English as "Since I'm doing it for Naples, something of this kind doesn't seem bad to me") * "da adottare anche per i nostri reviewers esterni, che dici?" (Literally translated to English as "to adopt also for our external reviewers, what do you think?") * "Ciao, Vic" (Literally translated to English as "Hi, Vic") * "
  " (A break tag) * "Vittorio Cortellessa, Ph.D." (The sender's name and title) * "DISIM - Universita' dell'Aquila" (The sender's institution) * "Via Vetoio, 1 - Coppito" (The sender's address) * "67010 L'Aquila, Italy" (The sender's location) * "(+39) 0862-433165" (The sender's phone number) * "vittorio.cortellessa@univaq.it" (The sender's email address) * "https://www.disim.univaq.it/VittorioCortellessa/261" (The sender's website link) Based on the content of the email, it appears to be a professional communication written in Italian, possibly for work-related purposes. --- Siccome lo sto facendo per Napoli, una cosa del genere non mi sembra male da adottare anche per i nostri reviewers esterni, che dici? Ciao, Vic --------------------------------------- Vittorio Cortellessa, Ph.D. DISIM - Universita' dell'Aqui todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-01-23 Invitation to contribute to a research on Research Artifacts in Software Engineering todoist-id:: 6fpfGjhVqWpPh5hg todoist-project:: #Inbox todoist-due:: 2026-01-23 todoist-desc:: From: scbs@cin.ufpe.br Received: 2026-01-20T14:34:47Z ✉: Web Link --- ## Task Summary: Software Engineering Research Artifacts Survey Description: This is an invitation to participate in a research study on Research Artifacts in Software Engineering. The study aims to understand current practices, challenges, and improvement opportunities in preparing and sharing research artifacts within the Software Engineering community. You are invited because you have authored at least one Software Engineering paper with an artifact-related badge in the past five years, indicating experience in sharing research artifacts. The survey is anonymous, takes approximately 30 minutes to complete, and can be accessed via the provided link. A reminder email will be sent in two weeks. If you have already completed the survey or do not wish to participate, please reply to the sender to be excluded from future reminders. The study has been approved by the UFPE’s Ethics Committee. Actionable Task Recommendation: Task: Participate in Software Engineering Research Artifacts Survey Details: * Objective: Complete the anonymous survey on Research Artifacts in Software Engineering. * Estimated time: 30 minutes. * Link: Research Artifacts in Software Engineering * Action for non-participation: Reply to the sender if you have already completed the survey or do not wish to participate, to be excluded from future reminders. Deadline: * A reminder email will be sent in approximately two weeks. (While not a hard deadline for completion, consider this a soft deadline for responding to decline participation if you do not intend to complete the survey.) --- Dear Davide Di Ruscio, I am Sergio Soares, Full Professor at the Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Brazil, where I coordinate the Empirical Software Engineering Group (ESEG). Ana Paula Vasconcelos (in cc), a Ph.D. candidate at UFPE, i todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-01-23 Acquistare trasformatore todoist-id:: 6fWf6CF6R77g64wg todoist-project:: #📗 Personal todoist-due:: 2026-01-23 todoist-desc:: RemaTarlazzi S.p.A. · Via Nuova, 7/a, 67051 Avezzano AQ, Italy Telefono 0863455041 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-01-23 R: Aggiornamento Paper DRAMA: Nuova Metodologia e Risultati todoist-id:: 6fW295wjFjqGj5c8 todoist-project:: #✏️ PAPERS todoist-due:: 2026-01-23 todoist-desc:: Web Link Okay, here’s a task description for the email “R: Aggiornamento Paper DRAMA: Nuova Metodologia e Risultati,” crafted with actionable steps, aiming to help someone understand and complete the task: Task Title: Finalize & Share the DRAMA Paper Update Description: This task focuses on finalizing the updated DRAMA paper and ensuring it’s presented effectively to stakeholders. It involves reviewing the document, incorporating feedback, and preparing it for distribution. Actionable Steps: 1. Review the Document: Carefully read the entire updated DRAMA paper. Pay particular attention to the section regarding [Specifically mention the key section or data point the paper focuses on - e.g., methodology, results, conclusions]. 2. Gather Feedback: Share the document with [Assignee - specify who needs to review it - e.g., Team Lead, Senior Analyst]. Actively solicit feedback on clarity, accuracy, and completeness. 3. Address Feedback: Respond to each piece of feedback received. Document all changes made based on feedback. Prioritize revisions based on the severity of the feedback. 4. Incorporate Changes: Implement the necessary revisions to ensure the document accurately reflects the updated methodology and results. 5. Draft a Summary/Executive Summary: Create a concise executive summary highlighting the key takeaways, the updated methodology, and the most significant results (approximately [Specify length – e.g., 1-2 paragraphs]). 6. Finalize & Format: Ensure the document is properly formatted, including consistent headings, tables, figures, and citations. 7. Prepare for Distribution: Choose the appropriate distribution method (e.g., email, shared drive, presentation). Consider adding a brief introductory paragraph explaining the update. 8. Proofread: Conduct a final proofread to catch any errors before final submission. Priority: Medium - This task requires focused effort and attention to detail. Due Date: [Specify a realistic deadline – e.g., End of Day Tomorrow] Notes: If you have any specific areas you’d like me to focus on during the review, please let me know. --- To help me refine this further and make it even better, could you tell me: * Who is the intended audience for this task? (e.g., Team, Management, Clients?) * What is the specific goal of the updated paper? (e.g., present a new strategy, demonstrate improved efficiency, provide data insights?) todoist-labels:: #outlook365 todoist-status:: ◼️
• 2026-01-23 Re: Rinnovo Assegni di Ricerca e Nuovi Incarichi di Ricerca su fondi di Ateneo 2026 todoist-id:: 6fphgQWXJxgq2Qp8 todoist-project:: #🏢 Admin todoist-due:: 2026-01-23 todoist-desc:: From: donatella.donatelli@univaq.it Received: 2026-01-20T20:59:52Z ✉: Web Link --- --- Caro Davide, per quanto riguarda la tempistica sui fondi RIA mi sono tenuta prudenzialmente un po’ larga nei tempi considerando che i bandi potrebbero essere tanti e non tutti i colleghi sono efficienti nell’inviare la documentazione alla segreteria. todoist-status:: ◼️