2.1 KiB
tags:: Low-code development, Model-driven engineering, No-code development date:: 01-04-2022 issn:: 1619-1374 issue:: 2 doi:: 10.1007/s10270-021-00970-2 title:: @Low-code development and model-driven engineering: Two sides of the same coin? pages:: 437-446 volume:: 21 item-type:: journalArticle access-date:: 2023-05-17T09:52:15Z original-title:: Low-code development and model-driven engineering: Two sides of the same coin? language:: en url:: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-021-00970-2 short-title:: Low-code development and model-driven engineering publication-title:: Software and Systems Modeling journal-abbreviation:: Softw Syst Model authors:: Davide Di Ruscio, Dimitris Kolovos, Juan de Lara, Alfonso Pierantonio, Massimo Tisi, Manuel Wimmer library-catalog:: Springer Link links:: Local library, Web library
- Abstract
- The last few years have witnessed a significant growth of so-called low-code development platforms (LCDPs) both in gaining traction on the market and attracting interest from academia. LCDPs are advertised as visual development platforms, typically running on the cloud, reducing the need for manual coding and also targeting non-professional programmers. Since LCDPs share many of the goals and features of model-driven engineering approaches, it is a common point of debate whether low-code is just a new buzzword for model-driven technologies, or whether the two terms refer to genuinely distinct approaches. To contribute to this discussion, in this expert-voice paper, we compare and contrast low-code and model-driven approaches, identifying their differences and commonalities, analysing their strong and weak points, and proposing directions for cross-pollination.
- Attachments
- Di Ruscio et al_2022_Low-code development and model-driven engineering.pdf {{zotero-imported-file V2ZTBPAV, "Di Ruscio et al_2022_Low-code development and model-driven engineering.pdf"}}