[logseq-plugin-git:commit] 2026-01-12T18:42:25.001Z

This commit is contained in:
2026-01-12 19:42:25 +01:00
parent 623b6dfd63
commit 37fe5b1a1c
@@ -15,6 +15,16 @@ todoist:: https://app.todoist.com/app/task/software-and-systems-modeling-manuscr
- ### [[Comments]]
- Reviewer 1 / REJECT
- Confidential comment
- I suspect there may be some use of generative AI in this submission. I only sampled a few references, and found issues in most of them. See this part of my review below:
- The bibliographic references need to be thoroughly checked. I selected [21-25] as a sample, and found issues in all of them:
- The DOI link for [21] points to a different ICWS 2010 paper ("Formal Specification and Verification of Data-Centric Service Composition"). Please correct your link.
- I could not find the paper [22]. I could not find any paper with that title in Google Scholar at all, and volume 2, issue 1 of the Journal of Cloud Computing does not mention it either: https://link.springer.com/journal/13677/volumes-and-issues/2-1.
- The DOI link for [23] does not work (https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSS.2013.6550432). The correct DOI is 10.1109/ICSS.2013.13.
- The DOI link for [24] points to a different CLOUD 2012 paper. I could not find a paper with this title in Google Scholar (""An approach for tenant placement in multi-tenant saas applications"). I could not find this paper among the CLOUD 2012 papers, either.
- I could not find the paper [25]. I could not find any paper with that title ("Formal concept analysis for dynamic resource reconfiguration in energy-efficient cloud computing") in Google Scholar, the DOI link does not work, and the relevant volume and issue of the journal do not list any papers with "Formal" in the title: https://www-computer-org.libproxy.york.ac.uk/csdl/journal/cc/2023/02.
These incorrect references (or references to missing papers) are representative of the hallucinations caused by improper use of generative AI. I suggest the editor to thoroughly check the other references in the paper and make a decision on this aspect.
-
- Reviewer 2 / REJECT
- Reviewer 3 / REJECT