[logseq-plugin-git:commit] 2026-01-05T18:42:42.136Z

journals/2026_01_05.md

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+progress:: {{renderer :todomaster}}
+icon:: 📅
+boox-notes:: ![BOOX Notes](../assets/../../onyx/TabUltraCPro/Notepad/JOURNALING.pdf)
+
+	- ### Tasks
+		-
+		-
+	- ### Notes
+		-
+-

pages/Benchmarks.md

@@ -3,4 +3,5 @@ tags:: [[PROJECTS/MOSAICO]], [[P1]]
 	- In one of the ICSE papers that I reviewed [[ICSE2026-paper1656]] there is this reference to look at:
 		- >[21] René Just, Darioush Jalali, and Michael D. Ernst. 2014.  **Defects4j: A Database of Existing Faults to Enable Controlled Testing Studies for Java Programs**. In International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, ISSTA ’14, San Jose, CA, USA - July 21 - 26, 2014. ACM, 437–440.
 		- It made me think that when benhmarking AI agents, we need to follow something similar with what we did with Jesus ([ModelXGlue: a benchmarking framework for ML tools in MDE | Software and Systems Modeling](https://link-springer-com.univaq.idm.oclc.org/article/10.1007/s10270-024-01183-z))
-		- In particular, this concept of database of existing subjects to be investigated should be made explicit in the language for specifying benchmarks.
+		- In particular, this concept of database of existing subjects to be investigated should be made explicit in the language for specifying benchmarks.
+	-

pages/Planner.md

@@ -2,16 +2,15 @@ icon:: 📅
 
 - ## FOCUS
 	- [[REVIEWS]]
-id:: 6938231c-2456-474f-b723-54a14064632f
+	  id:: 6938231c-2456-474f-b723-54a14064632f
 	  :LOGBOOK:
 	  CLOCK: [2025-12-16 Tue 09:55:28]--[2025-12-16 Tue 09:55:29] =>  00:00:01
 	  :END:
-	- [[PAPERS/2025-IEEESOFTWARE-AGENTIC-SI]]
 	- [[ADMIN/MISSIONI]]
-	- ---
 	- [[PROJECTS/MOSAICO]]
 		- [[Benchmarking framework]]
 			- [[Benchmarks]] #PROJECTS/MOSAICO #P1
+	- ---
 	- [[CV Empower]]
 	- [[Linee guida afferenza Collegio dottorato ICT]] #todoist-task #SERVICES/PHDICT
 	- ---