[logseq-plugin-git:commit] 2026-01-05T18:42:42.136Z

This commit is contained in:
2026-01-05 19:42:42 +01:00
parent 8c56aa2612
commit 3e15d691cc
3 changed files with 14 additions and 4 deletions
+10
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
progress:: {{renderer :todomaster}}
icon:: 📅
boox-notes:: ![BOOX Notes](../assets/../../onyx/TabUltraCPro/Notepad/JOURNALING.pdf)
- ### Tasks
-
-
- ### Notes
-
-
+1
View File
@@ -4,3 +4,4 @@ tags:: [[PROJECTS/MOSAICO]], [[P1]]
- >[21] René Just, Darioush Jalali, and Michael D. Ernst. 2014. **Defects4j: A Database of Existing Faults to Enable Controlled Testing Studies for Java Programs**. In International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, ISSTA 14, San Jose, CA, USA - July 21 - 26, 2014. ACM, 437440.
- It made me think that when benhmarking AI agents, we need to follow something similar with what we did with Jesus ([ModelXGlue: a benchmarking framework for ML tools in MDE | Software and Systems Modeling](https://link-springer-com.univaq.idm.oclc.org/article/10.1007/s10270-024-01183-z))
- In particular, this concept of database of existing subjects to be investigated should be made explicit in the language for specifying benchmarks.
-
+1 -2
View File
@@ -6,12 +6,11 @@ id:: 6938231c-2456-474f-b723-54a14064632f
:LOGBOOK:
CLOCK: [2025-12-16 Tue 09:55:28]--[2025-12-16 Tue 09:55:29] => 00:00:01
:END:
- [[PAPERS/2025-IEEESOFTWARE-AGENTIC-SI]]
- [[ADMIN/MISSIONI]]
- ---
- [[PROJECTS/MOSAICO]]
- [[Benchmarking framework]]
- [[Benchmarks]] #PROJECTS/MOSAICO #P1
- ---
- [[CV Empower]]
- [[Linee guida afferenza Collegio dottorato ICT]] #todoist-task #SERVICES/PHDICT
- ---