[logseq-plugin-git:commit] 2026-01-26T10:29:45.108Z

pages/todoist___2026-01-26.md

@@ -90,23 +90,6 @@
   todoist-due:: 2026-01-26
   todoist-desc:: From: m.s.trab@hotmail.com Received: 2026-01-08T09:03:19Z ✉: [Web Link](https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?ItemID=AAMkADM1NGNiNjk0LTY0ZGUtNDgzOC04MDM5LWNhODNkYWNjNjU4YwBGAAAAAACT6qp78kRgRKuUMBdWEga%2FBwCOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAAAAAEMAACOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAiVbuRAAAA%3D&exvsurl=1&viewmodel=ReadMessageItem) --- Okay, here's a synthesized summary of the email content, broken down into actionable tasks and a brief explanation of the key points: **Summary of Email Content:** The email is requesting Professor Di Ruscio's availability as the responsible professor for coordinating a Erasmus+ credit mobility visit to the University of L’Aquila (Department of Information Engineering, Computer Science and Mathematics). The primary task is to review and collaborate on the proposed mobility programme, ensuring alignment with department priorities and ongoing initiatives. The email also provides attached documents: a CV and a proposed mobility programme. Finally, it includes contact information and a thank you for their guidance. **Actionable Tasks & Recommendations:** 1. **Review the Proposed Mobility Programme:** Carefully examine the proposed mobility programme – the attachments provided. Ensure it aligns with the department’s specific goals, research areas, and current projects. 2. **Review CV:** Thoroughly analyze the CV to understand the applicant's qualifications and experience, particularly relevant to the Erasmus+ visit. 3. **Collaborate on Academic & Training Activities:** Work with the applicant to define the specific learning and research activities that should be undertaken during the visit. Establish clear objectives and expected outcomes. 4. **Agreement on Programmatic Details:** Discuss and finalize the details of the program. This includes: * **Timeline:** Set a realistic timeline for the project's completion. * **Budget:** Establish a budget for resources and travel. * **Responsibilities:** Clearly delineate the roles and responsibilities of both the applicant and the professor. 5. **Provide Feedback:** Offer constructive feedback on the proposed mobility programme. This includes suggestions for improvements to enhance the student’s experience and contribution to the department's goals. 6. **Confirmation & Next Steps:** Formalize the agreement and schedule a follow-up meeting or communication to discuss the collaboration further. 7. **Contact Information:** Double-check the contact details provided. Let me know if you'd like me to elaborate on any of these tasks or provide more specific suggestions! --- Dear Prof. Di Ruscio, I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to kindly request your availability to act as the responsible professor for coordinating my upcoming Erasmus+ credit mobility visit to the University of L’Aquila, specifically within
   todoist-status:: ◼️
-- [[2026-01-26]] [📢 NEWS FLASH - NEW FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES: Including Horizon Europe 2026-2027 Work Programmes (worth €14 billion) Published 1) HORIZON EUROPE 2026-27 WORK PROGRAMMES, CALLS & EU INFODAYS 👉 All… …](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/jo-frost-15936423_news-flash-new-funding-opportunities-activity-7404829038617337856-Jrt8?utm_source=social_share_send&utm_medium=android_app&rcm=ACoAAACaoXoBMvdj060syLix4vC3rwOgjAE9MpU&utm_campaign=share_via)
-  todoist-id:: [6fVGR9pwQP92rGj8](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fVGR9pwQP92rGj8)
-  todoist-project:: #🚀 Projects
-  todoist-due:: 2026-01-26
-  todoist-status:: ◼️
-- [[2026-01-26]] GSSI Committee Documents – Draft Minutes and Regulation
-  todoist-id:: [6fVFH9Gfqgfh6cj8](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fVFH9Gfqgfh6cj8)
-  todoist-project:: #👷 WORK
-  todoist-due:: 2026-01-26
-  todoist-desc:: [Web Link](https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?ItemID=AAkALgAAAAAAHYQDEapmEc2byACqAC%2FEWg0AjoVpQvBez0Ss5ZY2WGWEJgAIgIklWAAA&exvsurl=1&viewmodel=ReadMessageItem) Task Title: Review and Organize GSSI Committee Documents Task Description: Review and organize the draft minutes and regulations of the GSSI Committee to ensure accuracy, completeness, and ease of access. The task involves the following actions: 1. Download and open the email attachment containing the draft minutes and regulations. 2. Review the documents to verify their accuracy and completeness. Identify any discrepancies or inconsistencies and make necessary corrections. 3. Organize the documents in a logical and accessible manner, such as creating folders or tags for each document type (e.g., minutes, regulations, etc.). 4. Save the organized documents in a central location, such as a shared drive or cloud storage, to ensure easy accessibility for all committee members. 5. Notify the committee members of the availability of the organized documents and provide instructions on how to access them. 6. Maintain the documents and ensure they are up-to-date and current. Actionable Steps: 1. Download and open the email attachment containing the draft minutes and regulations. 2. Review the documents for accuracy and completeness. 3. Organize the documents in a logical and accessible manner. 4. Save the organized documents in a central location. 5. Notify committee members of the availability of the organized documents. 6. Maintain the documents and ensure they are up-to-date and current.
-  todoist-labels:: #outlook365
-  todoist-status:: ◼️
-- [[2026-01-26]] Pensare alla questione gestione Reference Group 2.2
-  todoist-id:: [6fhqXvj7Mj8hXmM9](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fhqXvj7Mj8hXmM9)
-  todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT
-  todoist-due:: 2026-01-26
-  todoist-status:: ◼️
 - [[2026-01-26]] [IRIS]: Registrazione tesi
   todoist-id:: [6fqHHjcMQ8hF5VM8](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fqHHjcMQ8hF5VM8)
   todoist-project:: #🎓 Services-PHDICT
@@ -236,12 +219,6 @@
   todoist-desc:: Weblink: [Outlook](https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?ItemID=AAMkADM1NGNiNjk0LTY0ZGUtNDgzOC04MDM5LWNhODNkYWNjNjU4YwBGAAAAAACT6qp78kRgRKuUMBdWEga%2FBwCOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAAAAAEMAACOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAiamtsPAAA%3D&exvsurl=1&viewmodel=ReadMessageItem) Email Content Summary: Proposal for the Univaq podcast to feature a series of interventions by research PhD students across various scientific areas and schools. The initiative aligns with the goal to narrate the life of an important and dynamic academic community. Seeking opinion and coordination for necessary steps from the coordinator of the podcast. No specific deadlines mentioned.
   todoist-labels:: #ai-generated #ai-generated-main-task
   todoist-status:: ◼️
-- [[2026-01-26]] JSSOFTWARE-D-25-01931
-  todoist-id:: [6fPwRv3QpfVM6p4g](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fPwRv3QpfVM6p4g)
-  todoist-project:: #📜 REVIEWS
-  todoist-due:: 2026-01-26
-  todoist-desc:: From: em@editorialmanager.com Received: 2025-12-01T12:45:47Z ✉: [Web Link](https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?ItemID=AAMkADM1NGNiNjk0LTY0ZGUtNDgzOC04MDM5LWNhODNkYWNjNjU4YwBGAAAAAACT6qp78kRgRKuUMBdWEga%2FBwCOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAAAAAEMAACOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAh7EZ0HAAA%3D&exvsurl=1&viewmodel=ReadMessageItem) --- Okay, here’s a summary of the email content, broken down into actionable steps, ready for a task description: **Task Summary:** The email is requesting a review of a manuscript titled "What Does Current Research Say About the Viability of Low-Code Development?" submitted to The Journal of Systems & Software by Dongmei Gao et al. The email emphasizes the importance of the review for the journal and provides clear instructions on how to proceed (agree, decline, or register a response). It also details the process of reviewing the manuscript, including a checklist of key areas to examine and the identification of contextual factors and potential benefits/challenges within LCD adoption. **Actionable Steps & Recommendations (as instructions for a task):** 1. **Review the Manuscript:** Carefully examine the paper for relevant details regarding Low-Code Development. Pay particular attention to the listed thematic areas – the benefits, challenges, and social aspects of LCD adoption. 2. **Confirm Review Agreement:** If you accept the review, click the link below: [https://track.editorialmanager.com/CL0/https://www.editorialmanager.com/jssoftware/](https://track.editorialmanager.com/CL0/https://www.editorialmanager.com/jssoftware/). 3. **Provide Feedback (if applicable):** If you are assigned a reviewer, please provide constructive feedback to ensure the manuscript receives the evaluation it deserves. Focus on the identified contextual factors and the strengths and weaknesses of the research. 4. **Reviewer Recognition:** Log into the Editorial Manager for The Journal of Systems & Software as a reviewer: [Editorial Manager®](https://www.editorialmanager.com/jssoftware/). You'll need your username: davide.diruscio@univaq.it. 5. **Respond to the Email:** Reply to the email stating your acceptance, decline or providing a response to the reviewers. 6. **Register Reviewer:** Register as a reviewer within the Editorial Manager: [https://www.reviewerrecognition.elsevier.com/](https://www.reviewerrecognition.elsevier.com/). Ensure you have your username (davide.diruscio@univaq.it) and password. 7. **Access Resources:** Utilize the provided resources: [Journal Article Publishing Support Center](https://help.elsevier.com/app/answers/list/p/7923) to learn about the Reviewer Hub, and [https://www.reviewerrecognition.elsevier.com/](https://www.reviewerrecognition.elsevier.com/) for more details about the review process. 8. **Follow Guidelines:** Carefully adhere to the Elsevier Reviewer Guidelines ([https://service.elsevier.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/14156/supporthub/publishing/<br>#REV_JSSOFTWARE#](https://service.elsevier.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/14156/supporthub/publishing/<br#REV_JSSOFTWARE#)). **To make the task actionable, you could create a checklist of these steps.** You could also document the key findings identified in the literature review and present those findings in a brief summary. --- Re manuscript: JSSOFTWARE-D-25-01931. Title: What Does Current Research Say About the Viability of Low-Code Development? A Systematic Literature Review. Authors: Dongmei Gao; Fabian Fagerholm; Vilma Toivanen. Dear Dr. Davide Di Ruscio, The above
-  todoist-status:: ◼️
 - [[2026-01-26]] CM3 WP3 Presentation
   todoist-id:: [6fm2PPccRPhRH7Qc](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fm2PPccRPhRH7Qc)
   todoist-project:: #📧EmailsToAnswer
@@ -254,8 +231,8 @@
   todoist-due:: 2026-01-26
   todoist-desc:: From: disorbo@unisannio.it Received: 2026-01-20T09:03:13Z ✉: [Web Link](https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?ItemID=AAMkADM1NGNiNjk0LTY0ZGUtNDgzOC04MDM5LWNhODNkYWNjNjU4YwBGAAAAAACT6qp78kRgRKuUMBdWEga%2FBwCOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAAAAAEMAACOhWlC8F7PRKzlljZYZYQmAAidZtYrAAA%3D&exvsurl=1&viewmodel=ReadMessageItem) --- Here's a summary of the email content and the corresponding actionable task: **Task Summary:** The email is a rejection notification from the Journal of Systems and Software (JSS) for the submission "Examining Fairness Issues in Machine Learning-based Systems" (Ref. No.: JSSOFTWARE-D-25-01604). While the paper is rejected, the editor strongly advises resubmission after addressing the reviewers' detailed comments. The reviewers highlight significant areas for improvement in the manuscript's framing of fairness, integration of related work, methodological structure and detail (especially for the qualitative analysis), dataset selection justification, and the significance and implications of the results. The resubmitted paper will be treated as a new submission. **Actionable Task:** **Task:** Revise and Resubmit Paper to Journal of Systems and Software **Description:** The submission "Examining Fairness Issues in Machine Learning-based Systems" (Ref. No.: JSSOFTWARE-D-25-01604) has been rejected by the Journal of Systems and Software. However, the editor encourages resubmission after addressing detailed reviewer comments. Key areas for improvement include: * **Framing of Fairness:** Clearly define whether fairness is treated as a technical, socio-technical, or hybrid concern. * **Related Work:** Synthesize the literature into a coherent argument rather than an enumerative survey. * **Methodology:** * Present a unified methodological structure with clear workflows and transitions between phases. * Provide more detailed explanations for the qualitative coding process, including iteration, rater interaction, and reliance on LLM summaries. * Clarify the sequencing of methodological steps and ensure logical dependencies. * Justify dataset selection criteria and report exclusion numbers. * Ensure consistency between research questions and the role of LLMs. * Consider extending the dataset size if feasible through pre-screening. * **Results and Discussion:** * Explicitly discuss novel vs. incremental findings and align with previous empirical work. * Provide concrete examples of implications for practitioners. * Consider adding new research questions and discussions. * Clarify the rationale for using large language models. * **Overall Cohesion:** Improve the integration and cohesion across different methods employed in the study. **Recommended Actions:** 1. **Thoroughly read and understand all reviewer comments.** 2. **Develop a detailed plan to address each comment.** Categorize comments by theme (e.g., Introduction, Methodology, Results, Discussion) to facilitate systematic revision. 3. **Rewrite sections of the manuscript** based on the reviewer feedback, focusing on the identified weaknesses. 4. **Prepare a comprehensive response letter** detailing how each reviewer comment has been addressed. 5. **Ensure the resubmitted manuscript is treated as a NEW submission** but consider disclosing the original submission information and reference number. 6. **Consult empirical research guidelines** (e.g., Paul Ralph et al. 2020) for structuring the revised manuscript and methodology. 7. **Consider creating a methodological diagram** to clarify the workflow. **No Deadline:** The email does not specify a deadline for resubmission. --- Buongiorno a tutti, vi giro la mail ricevuta da JSS. Saluti, Andrea ---------- Forwarded message --------- Da: Journal of Systems and Software <em@editorialmanager.com> Date: lun 19 gen 2026 alle ore 10:59 Subject: Decision on your submission
   todoist-status:: ◼️
-- [[2026-01-26]] [OpenCode | The open source AI coding agent](https://opencode.ai/)
-  todoist-id:: [6fpPgGfgM48RfhHg](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fpPgGfgM48RfhHg)
+- [[2026-01-26]] slides meeting atene
+  todoist-id:: [6fr2GQCp5cqv68Rg](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6fr2GQCp5cqv68Rg)
   todoist-project:: #Inbox
   todoist-due:: 2026-01-26
   todoist-status:: ◼️