151 lines
5.6 KiB
Plaintext
151 lines
5.6 KiB
Plaintext
==+== ICSE 2023 Review Form
|
||
==-== DO NOT CHANGE LINES THAT START WITH "==+==" OR "==*==".
|
||
==-== For further guidance, or to upload this file when you are done, go to:
|
||
==-== https://icse2023.hotcrp.com/offline
|
||
|
||
==+== =====================================================================
|
||
==+== Begin Review #223
|
||
==+== Reviewer: Davide Di Ruscio <davide.diruscio@univaq.it>
|
||
|
||
==+== Paper #223
|
||
==-== Title: Qualitative Clustering of Software Repositories Based on
|
||
==-== Software Metrics
|
||
|
||
==+== Review Readiness
|
||
==-== Enter "Ready" if the review is ready for others to see:
|
||
|
||
Ready
|
||
|
||
==*== Overall merit
|
||
==-== Please rate the overall quality of the manuscript. If you use (1)
|
||
==-== Reject or (4) Accept, then you are ready to argue against or in
|
||
==-== favor. Use (5) Strong accept if you want to nominate this as a
|
||
==-== distinguished paper
|
||
==-== Choices:
|
||
==-== 1. Reject
|
||
==-== 2. Weak reject
|
||
==-== 3. Weak accept
|
||
==-== 4. Accept
|
||
==-== 5. Strong accept (award quality)
|
||
==-== Enter the number of your choice:
|
||
|
||
(Your choice here)
|
||
|
||
==*== Reviewer expertise
|
||
==-== Choices:
|
||
==-== X. I am an expert on this topic (know the related work well)
|
||
==-== Y. I am knowledgeable on this topic
|
||
==-== Z. I am an informed outsider
|
||
==-== Enter the letter of your choice:
|
||
|
||
(Your choice here)
|
||
|
||
==*== Paper summary
|
||
==-== Please briefly summarize the paper in your own words, explaining
|
||
==-== to the authors how you understood the paper.
|
||
==-== Markdown styling and LaTeX math supported.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
==*== Strengths
|
||
==-== Please provide a short bullet-point list of the paper’s key
|
||
==-== strengths.
|
||
==-== Markdown styling and LaTeX math supported.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
==*== Weaknesses
|
||
==-== Please provide a short bullet-point list of the paper’s key
|
||
==-== weaknesses.
|
||
==-== Markdown styling and LaTeX math supported.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
==*== Artifacts assessment
|
||
==-== You have been designated as artifact checker for this paper.
|
||
==-== Please access the artifacts (if available) and briefly provide
|
||
==-== your assessment.
|
||
==-== You can complement the information provided here with further
|
||
==-== comments under **Comments for authors** when discussing the paper
|
||
==-== along the **Verifiability and Transparency** criterion.
|
||
==-== Choices:
|
||
==-== 1. The artifacts are unavailable while the authors declared their
|
||
==-== availability
|
||
==-== 2. The artifacts do not contain what is declared in the submission
|
||
==-== form and in the paper
|
||
==-== 3. The artifacts partially contain what is declared in the
|
||
==-== submission form and in the paper
|
||
==-== 4. The artifacts are in line with what is declared in the
|
||
==-== submission form and in the paper
|
||
==-== 5. Does not apply, the authors explained why artifacts were not
|
||
==-== provided
|
||
==-== Enter the number of your choice:
|
||
|
||
(Your choice here)
|
||
|
||
==*== Comments for authors
|
||
==-== Please provide constructive feedback to the authors for justifying
|
||
==-== your score. Please consider the following five criteria, as listed
|
||
==-== in the ICSE 2023 Call for Papers and detailed in the ICSE 2023
|
||
==-== Reviewer Guidelines, notably Section 6 "Reviewing".
|
||
==-==
|
||
==-== * **Soundness:** The extent to which the paper’s contributions
|
||
==-== and/or innovations address its research questions and are
|
||
==-== supported by rigorous application of appropriate research methods.
|
||
==-== * **Significance:** The extent to which the paper’s contributions
|
||
==-== can impact the field of software engineering, and under which
|
||
==-== assumptions (if any)
|
||
==-== * **Novelty:** The extent to which the contributions are
|
||
==-== sufficiently original with respect to the state-of-the-art
|
||
==-== * **Verifiability and Transparency:** The extent to which the
|
||
==-== paper includes sufficient information to understand how an
|
||
==-== innovation works; to understand how data was obtained, analyzed,
|
||
==-== and interpreted; and how the paper supports independent
|
||
==-== verification or replication of the paper’s claimed contributions.
|
||
==-== * **Presentation:** The extent to which the paper’s quality of
|
||
==-== writing meets the high standards of ICSE, including clear
|
||
==-== descriptions, as well as adequate use of the English language,
|
||
==-== absence of major ambiguity, clearly readable figures and tables,
|
||
==-== and adherence to the formatting instructions.
|
||
==-==
|
||
==-== Feel free to structure your review along these criteria.
|
||
==-== Markdown styling and LaTeX math supported.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
==*== Question for authors
|
||
==-== Please provide specific questions that *could affect your
|
||
==-== accept/reject decision or help support the paper*. If you have no
|
||
==-== such questions, please leave the form blank.
|
||
==-== Please number your questions: 1., 2., 3., ... starting with the
|
||
==-== most critical questions. Remember that the authors have limited
|
||
==-== space and must respond to all reviewers.
|
||
==-== Markdown styling and LaTeX math supported.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
==*== Comments on authors' response
|
||
==-== After the authors provide their response, please provide your
|
||
==-== comments on the authors' response, e.g.,
|
||
==-==
|
||
==-== * which questions have been satisfactorily answered by the
|
||
==-== authors; and
|
||
==-== * which questions have not been satisfactorily answered by the
|
||
==-== authors (and why not)
|
||
==-== Markdown styling and LaTeX math supported.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
==*== Comments for PC
|
||
==-== (hidden from authors)
|
||
==-== Please use this field to convey any message to other reviewers or
|
||
==-== chairs, if you do not want it to be seen by the authors.
|
||
==-== If you update the review, please state here what changes you made.
|
||
==-== Markdown styling and LaTeX math supported.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
==+== Scratchpad (for unsaved private notes)
|
||
|
||
==+== End Review
|