133 lines
6.8 KiB
Markdown
133 lines
6.8 KiB
Markdown
-
|
|
- ## Notes
|
|
- ## 🤝Meetings
|
|
- **CROSSMINER GROUP MEETING**
|
|
collapsed:: true
|
|
- type:: [[meeting]]
|
|
people:: [[people/crossminer]]
|
|
date:: [[18-01-2024]] - 17:41
|
|
duration::
|
|
- **Work Proposal 1**
|
|
collapsed:: true
|
|
- 
|
|
- 
|
|
- 
|
|
- 
|
|
- This is very much related to [[PROJECTS/MOSAICO]] [[Ideas]]
|
|
- 
|
|
- [[Ideas]]
|
|
- 
|
|
- 
|
|
- 
|
|
- 
|
|
- Results obtained with cross-validation.
|
|
- Using readme file to predict only one tag
|
|
- The dataset is like this, only one tag is assigned to each labeled model
|
|
- 
|
|
- We are missing the GitHub link.
|
|
-
|
|
- **Work Proposal 2 - Automate scientific workflows**
|
|
- 
|
|
- 
|
|
- 
|
|
- [[Ideas]]
|
|
- 
|
|
- 
|
|
- 
|
|
- We need to characterize the source code. The idea was to consider Jupyter notebook in a speculative way instead of Orange models that are limited in size.
|
|
- We need to characterize Jupyper notebook to do so. WE decided to rely on an existing work that classify Jupyter notebooks. So we could focus on those that implement data pipelines / workflows so that we can train a recommender for data pipelines / workflows.
|
|
- 
|
|
- 
|
|
- {:height 312, :width 1360}
|
|
-
|
|
- **MOSAICO meeting**
|
|
type:: [[meeting]]
|
|
external-links::
|
|
tags:: [[PROJECTS/MOSAICO]]
|
|
people::
|
|
date:: [[18-01-2024]] - 9:00
|
|
duration:: 100
|
|
collapsed:: true
|
|
- ### Agenda
|
|
- **Introduction partners**
|
|
- DONE @ all: could you please all prepare a presentation of 5 minutes describing your institution and your expertises.
|
|
background-color:: green
|
|
- **Concept presentation**: 5 minutes. --> Massimo presentation of the concept.
|
|
- **Key specific objectif vs SOTA vs WP introduction and challenges** for each of the 4 building blocks composing the MOSAICO platform:
|
|
- @YORK: may I ask you to present KSO 1 + SOTA related to communication protocol between AI agents in SE tasks + WP1 and possible tasks division --> 10 minutes
|
|
- DONE @UDA: may I ask you to present KSO 2 + SOTA related to management of agents communities for SE tasks + WP2 and possible tasks division --> 10 minutes
|
|
background-color:: green
|
|
- @IMT Massimo: may I ask you to present KSO 3 + SOTA related to coordination and collaboration of agents in SE tasks + WP3 and possible tasks division --> 10 minutes
|
|
- @LIST Jordi: may I ask you to present KSO 4 + SOTA related to governance in SE tasks + WP4 and possible tasks division --> 10 minutes
|
|
- [[BESSER]]
|
|
collapsed:: true
|
|
- {:height 411, :width 709}
|
|
- {:height 383, :width 712}
|
|
- **Contribution of INTRASOFT and ECLIPSE into the project**
|
|
- @John and ECL partners, please prepare suggestions.
|
|
- **Discussion about use cases**
|
|
- Immersion: feedback
|
|
- *UDA/ Davide*, any feedback on your side ?
|
|
- INTRASOFT, any end users ?
|
|
- **Thesis of Moamin**
|
|
collapsed:: true
|
|
- type:: [[meeting]]
|
|
external-links::
|
|
tags:: [[SERVICES/PHDICT]]
|
|
people::
|
|
date:: [[18-01-2024]] - 14:54
|
|
duration::
|
|
-
|
|
- Data quality
|
|
-
|
|
- 
|
|
- 
|
|
- How DataNode overlap with deployment components
|
|
- WHat are the aspects of novelty of this metamodel
|
|
- 
|
|
- What's the need for this compared with workflow languages of process based languages like BPMN?
|
|
- Data pipeline language [[question]]
|
|
- What's the novelty with respect to
|
|
- Apache NIFI
|
|
- Orange
|
|
- ML workflow technologies
|
|
- 
|
|
- 
|
|
- 
|
|
- 
|
|
- What's the novelty of this?
|
|
- Data Quality management
|
|
- 
|
|
- 
|
|
- 
|
|
- 
|
|
- Data quality #question
|
|
- Is it possible to add new data dimensions
|
|
- How have you elicited the quality dimensions?
|
|
- How to define quality, which can be based on a very subjective definitions
|
|
- 
|
|
- 
|
|
- It is not clear what are the research questions you wanted to answer with this evaluation [[question]]
|
|
- 
|
|
- 
|
|
- To appreciate the results it is necessary to understand the research questions
|
|
- 
|
|
- 
|
|
- 
|
|
- What kind of data you can support
|
|
- Is you tool able to generate tool or it's just a graphical interface
|
|
- Why are you considering GPS in you data model
|
|
- What are your future plans?
|
|
- WHat are the things that you did not manage to cover during your study and that you think you want to keep working
|
|
- If you would to teach, would you like to have a dedicated course on this or part of an existing course like software architecture
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
- {{query (and <%current page%> (property :type "meeting") (not <%current page%>))}}
|
|
- ## 📜Reviews
|
|
- {{query (and [[REVIEWS]] (or (property :date-end <%today%>) (property :date-start <%today%>) (property :date-submitted <%today%>)))}}
|
|
query-table:: true
|
|
query-properties:: [:file :year :venue :deadline]
|
|
- ## ⤴️Omnivore readings
|
|
- {{query (and (property :source [[Omnivore]]) (or (property :deadline <%today%>) (property :date-saved <%today%>) (property :date-archived <%today%>)))}}
|
|
query-table:: true
|
|
query-properties:: [:labels :state :full-title] |