Files
logseq/pages/GSSI - PhD Thesis proposal review.md
2025-06-05 22:07:12 +02:00

65 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown

- ## Invitation email
- ✉: ([URL Not Found
| URL shortener](http://s.diruscio.org/KvU8a)[http://s.diruscio.org/KvU8a])
- 📱: [http://s.diruscio.org/G1irN](http://s.diruscio.org/G1irN)
- Sender: "Gianlorenzo D'Angelo" [gianlorenzo.dangelo@gssi.it](mailto:gianlorenzo.dangelo@gssi.it)
- Sent: Sat Sep 24 2022 09:08:44 GMT+0200 (Central European Summer Time)
- ---
- The email contains 2 attached file(s)
- ---
- Dear Davide,
- Thank you again for having accepted to provide your opinion on the
- thesis proposal delivered by Jose Aleandro Concepcion Alvarez (see
- attached PDF file).
- Your report should simply consist of an evaluation of the following aspects of the thesis proposal as "good", "sufficient" or "insufficient".
- *Knowledge of the state of the art in the research field addressed in the proposal.*
- *Novelty* of the research proposal.
- *Feasibility* of the research proposal.
- *Global* evaluation of the thesis proposal (here "insufficient" means that you do not recommend that the student be admitted to the second year of his Ph.D. studies).
- A few lines justifying your evaluation and possibly offering some suggestions that might be useful for the student in his/her future research (if the proposal is evaluated at least of sufficient quality to form the basis for a PhD thesis) are more than welcome.
- If you want, you can (but you are not obliged to) use the attached LaTeX template.
- We would need to receive your report by October 7, 2022.
- I thank you again and I look forward to hearing from you.
- All the best,
- Gianlorenzo D'Angelo and Pierluigi Crescenzi
- Coordinators of the PhD program in Computer Science at GSSI
- ---
- ### File
- ![Thesis_Proposal_Jose_Alvarez.pdf](../assets/Thesis_Proposal_Jose_Alvarez_1664999883485_0.pdf)
- tItle:: Recommender Systems for Reference Architectures
author:: Jose Alejandro Concepcion
supervisors:: #people/ludovico #people/mariani
-
- ## Comments
- The document is missing a conclusion section
- ((633df160-52ba-4e3b-87b0-de325895edc1))
- Interesting, even though it is not clear what you would like to recommend
- ((633df1f2-53ed-4105-abed-ad47cc527574))
- Instantiation process... this is important! #MAINGOAL
- ((633df242-8b3d-4c2f-994b-68f7bef61b57))
- That's crucial, how to address this?
- ((633df5c4-3e3f-448f-877a-cb4320ad9747))
- ((633ed873-be0c-4cd2-b0d5-b6ddefb0e6f4))
- [Guardare qualcosa su servless backend](https://todoist.com/showTask?id=6238683022)
- ((633ed9bc-bbab-4f58-bb01-dc66a3cad84d))
- Qualche ref per #people/riccardo
- ((633eda20-1dd6-4253-9996-31ff7bd47495))
- Caratterizza cosa?
- ((633edd00-5a84-450d-9878-7600c35bbb1e))
- IMPORTANT
- ((633edd38-5b7c-490e-b770-9d806802076d))
- #MAINGOAL
- ((633edd99-6dde-41bf-b886-bebc00f77893))
- #MAINGOAL
-
- ((633ee518-c325-4c14-86fb-492a67e7ed3a))
- feedback mechanism. Useful for #people/riccardo
- ((633eef2b-f0a1-4796-bc97-36efe446c972))
- #MAINGOAL
- ((633eef63-1d3d-47ea-88c5-540ca879340d))
- The problem that I see it is related to the relation identifying the instance relation between *Reference Architecture* and *Software Architecture*
- Appunto
- ((633ef07a-daba-48c8-b053-4470f63d0146))
- ((633ff5a3-5955-415c-8cbe-68ae0d3121b1))
- **This is risky in my opinion**
-