logseq/pages/PAPERS___2024-TESORO.md

type:: JournalPaper date:: 29-03-2024 - 08:03 full-title:: external-links:: TSE-Tesoro (Copy) - Online LaTeX Editor Overleaf todoist:: 7840710789 year:: date-start:: status:: SUBMITTED priority:: p1 leader:: people/PhuongNguyen progress:: {{renderer :todomaster}}

- #.tabular
	- ## MEETINGS
		- {{query (and [[PAPERS/2024-TESORO]] (block-property :type [[meeting]]) (not (page [[PAPERS/2024-TESORO]])))}}
		- query-table:: true
	- ## READINGS
		- #+BEGIN_QUERY
		    {:title "Related readings in Omnivore"
		  :query [:find (pull ?b [*] )
		        :in $ ?current-page
		  	  :where
		  		    [?b :block/page ?p]
		              [?p :block/name ?p-name]
		  		    [?b :block/content ?c]
		  		    [(clojure.string/includes? ?c ?current-page)]
		              [(clojure.string/includes? ?p-name "omnivore")]
		  		  ]
		         :inputs [:current-page]}
		  #+END_QUERY
		-
	- ## TASKs
		-
	- ## ❓️ QUESTIONS TO ANSWER
		- {{query (and [[question]][[PAPERS/2024-TESORO]])}}
		-
	- ## [[PAPERS/NOTES]]
		- It is important to clarify that TESORO is a dataset. Sometimes the message is misleading. For instance, if you look at the third bullet point at the beginning of section 3, it seems that TESORO is something more.
			- ![image.png](../assets/image_1730052609328_0.png)
		- There is a potential problem in Sec. 3.2. Source codes are assigned the same TD label recognized by the classifier by taking as input the corresponding comment. How can we be sure that the comments consumed by the classifier is actually referring to the source code under analysis?
			- ![image.png](../assets/image_1730052522959_0.png)
				- We have a potential threat to validity here. We need to be sure that we are always able to link functions to corresponding comments and vice-
		- ![image.png](../assets/image_1730052755739_0.png)
			- What if the Single comment block in the Figure includes a TD? How is it managed in the process? [[question]]
		- ![image.png](../assets/image_1730053430880_0.png){:height 262, :width 691}
			- Why developing a new TD detection tool instead of reusing existing ones? It is important to clarify this aspect, especially because in Section 2 we make an overview of existing approaches. [[question]]
		- Section 3.5.2: *Did the students have to manage cases where TD admissions in comments did not occur in the corresponding source code?* [[question]]