29 lines
1.1 KiB
Markdown
29 lines
1.1 KiB
Markdown
type:: [[REVIEWS]]
|
||
tags::
|
||
year:: 2024
|
||
venue:: [[ICSE]]
|
||
full-title::
|
||
date-start:: [[23-09-2024]] - 17:16
|
||
date-submitted::
|
||
external-links::
|
||
status:: [[DONE]]
|
||
deadline-submission::
|
||
file:: [[@icse2025-paper1504]]
|
||
parent:: [[icse2025-paper548]]
|
||
todoist::
|
||
|
||
- ### [[Highlights]]
|
||
- Ecological validity refers to **the realism with which a design of evaluation setup matches the user's real work context**. #card
|
||
id:: 66f18c4d-23f7-4d32-b7e6-6bc786860145
|
||
- ### [[Comments]]
|
||
- The authors have done a significant work to improve the initial submission by adding a comparison of their approach with the baseline reviewers suggested. They also fixed the other issues reviewers identified. As a minor comment, I think the text on page 6 below RQ2.5 should go below RQ2 and vice-versa.
|
||
id:: 66f19226-182c-431a-b11f-5a2637dcdafb
|
||
- ### [[REVIEWS/Notes]]
|
||
- ### YELLOW CONCERNS
|
||
background-color:: yellow
|
||
- {{query (and [[ffd400]] [[icse2025-paper1504]] )}}
|
||
collapsed:: true
|
||
- ### ❓️Questions
|
||
- {{query (and [[question]] [[icse2025-paper1504]] )[[question]]}}
|
||
query-table:: true
|
||
query-properties:: [:block] |