30 lines
2.1 KiB
Markdown
30 lines
2.1 KiB
Markdown
type:: [[REVIEWS]]
|
|
tags:: [[github actions]] [[preliminary study]]
|
|
year:: 2023
|
|
venue:: [[SATTOSE]]
|
|
full-title:: A Preliminary Study of GitHub Actions Dependencies
|
|
date-start:: [[04-05-2023]] - 10:34
|
|
date-submitted::
|
|
file:: 
|
|
external-links::
|
|
status:: [[DONE]]
|
|
|
|
- [[Highlights]]
|
|
- ((64537082-9991-4f1a-bca2-9a1f45f753a8))
|
|
- ((645370e4-a9dd-4d3e-999b-9462be22f53d))
|
|
- ((64537bd9-b2f8-4345-821c-515737f7e382)) #card
|
|
id:: 65c8d476-0a2b-46da-b420-8dbab5cb5005
|
|
- GitHub Actions is a GitHub technology providing CI/CD [[SERVICES]] for automated building, testing, quality analysis, [[code]] [[Comments]], etc.
|
|
- ((64537c9b-64fd-4e72-b520-c5f84f8f6a8c))
|
|
- Empirical studies have found that GitHub Actions are becoming more popular than other CI/CD tools such as Travise, CircleCI, and Azure. Qualitative studies comprehending the underlying factors driving such a tranformation have also been performed.
|
|
- ==Configuring and debugging workflow files is one of the most common difficulties encountered [[by]] users of GitHub Actions.==
|
|
- [[Comments]]
|
|
- The [[paper]] presents an empirical analysis to answer two research [[GOALS]], i.e., characterizing Actions that are available in the GitHub marketplace, and analyzing the dependency characteristics of GitHub Actions, [[by]] distinguishing those in JavaScript, in Docker, and composite ones.
|
|
- I enjoyed reading this [[paper]], which is well-written and structured. I like the way the [[authors]] have performed the study and the found insights are very relevant for the event
|
|
-
|
|
- RIVISTA
|
|
- This [[paper]] provides an empirical analysis that seeks to answer two research [[GOALS]]. Firstly, it characterizes the actions available in the GitHub marketplace. Secondly, it analyzes the dependency characteristics of GitHub Actions [[by]] distinguishing those in JavaScript, Docker, and composite ones.
|
|
- I found the [[paper]] to be well-written and structured, and I enjoyed reading it. The study is well-designed and conducted, and the insights determined [[by]] the [[authors]] are highly relevant to the event.
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
- |